Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MILITARY JUDGE says evidence could be an "EMBARRASSMENT" to BHO!
YouTube ^ | September 03, 2010 | ppsimmons

Posted on 09/04/2010 10:00:04 AM PDT by RatsDawg

BREAKING! SHOCKER! MILITARY JUDGE says evidence could be an "EMBARRASSMENT" to BHO! Check out the video on YouTube


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armyvsamerica; armyvsamericans; armyvstruth; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; islam; kangaroocourt; military; muslim; naturalborncitizen; nobc; nobirthcertificate; nochainofcommand; nojustice; obama; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-291 next last
To: mlo

none were called for...


141 posted on 09/04/2010 5:35:42 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
Pelosi signed off for the DNC...nothing more.
142 posted on 09/04/2010 5:37:49 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
I think by now, it's pointless to argue with these clowns. They will never accept any answer except what they have already concluded. The courts have rejected every claim in this arena, Congress, as represented by the duly elected Speaker of the House, has signed off on his presidency and his qualifications to be president; case closed . . . except for the die hard birthers.

You can't reason with the unreasonable.

How am I being unreasonable?

Also; I would like to see your answers to the questions I posted in #119, while not directly part of the "birther" argument it illustrates quite well how governments at all levels can, and do, ignore their Constitutions.

143 posted on 09/04/2010 5:40:44 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg

bump


144 posted on 09/04/2010 5:41:38 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Doesn’t change the facts. It was Congress’s job and they made their decision.


145 posted on 09/04/2010 6:05:40 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I don’t think that Obama’s ineligibility for the presidency will ever be resolved. Too many influential and powerful people from both sides of the political aisle have cooperated in the deception of the American people. They will all be involved in protecting each others political future. Anyone breaking ranks may meet an untimely death.


146 posted on 09/04/2010 6:14:39 PM PDT by 353FMG (ISLAM - America's inevitable road to destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Doesn’t change the facts. It was Congress’s job and they made their decision.

Last time I checked we had three branches of government for checks and balances..the Supremes are on deck...They will have to answer the question of what is an NBC sooner or later.

147 posted on 09/04/2010 6:22:26 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
If I recall correctly George Washington would have been disqualified from becoming the first President of the Constitutional United States

You don't.


148 posted on 09/04/2010 6:25:45 PM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Wrong: He *HAS* been charged

By what authority?

149 posted on 09/04/2010 6:27:24 PM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

Congress and the Supreme court has defined Natural born citizenship as being born to parents whom are American citizens. Based on our laws , Article 2 of the Constitution , obama is ineligible to be President. Congress has chosen to ignor Article 2, but regardless it still leaves us with no legal President. Congress does not have the right to allow obama to serve as president,as they know he is ineligible. The proper way to remove obama is to VOID his election. This would mean he never ran for office , never choose biden as vice- President, never made any appointments. The legal President of the U.S. is John McCain and the legal vice- President is Sarah Palin. They have the majority of the “legal” electorial college votes. When obama’s election is voided ,so would his electorial college votes be voided.


150 posted on 09/04/2010 6:36:12 PM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

>>Wrong: He *HAS* been charged
>
>By what authority?

By people who are, supposedly, free to make whatever charges they wish. (Though like slander and libel they are not free from the consequences of those charges.) And the authority most often cited is that of the Constitution; either it *IS* the supreme law of the land (and obviously has such authority to present requirements to public officials), or it is not... in which case I must ask from whence does each of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches get their authority? {Furthermore, is it an authority I should respect?}


151 posted on 09/04/2010 6:43:07 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

>>If I recall correctly George Washington would have been disqualified from becoming the first President of the Constitutional United States
>
>You don’t.

Thanks; that’s why I prefaced it with the “if I recall correctly...”
A quick websearch turned this up on wikipedia (not the source to base research on, but good for general non-political info):
“At Fraunces Tavern on December 4, Washington formally bade his officers farewell and on December 23, 1783, he resigned his commission as commander-in-chief, emulating the Roman general Cincinnatus.”


152 posted on 09/04/2010 6:49:56 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg

Isn’t that somewhere in the Constitution? Evidence that may prove embarrassing to someone is inadmissible.


153 posted on 09/04/2010 6:50:44 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Right between the penumbra that grants the 'right' for institutionalized human sacrifices of the country's most defenseless citizens and the emanation that gives validity to the operation of the BATFE.

We needed a Constitutional Amendment to allow the federal regulation of Alcohol, which has since been rescinded, Tobacco has *never* had such an amendment & Firearms are supposedly protected from such an organization such as the BATFE by the 2nd Amendment.

154 posted on 09/04/2010 6:56:54 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
None taken. The irony here, is not that I need a civics lesson as you appear to suggest...but rather, that anti-birthers do.

You said: "I don’t think you get it. If we elected a 2 year old pet parakeet born in Africa and if congress approved, the military would call the parakeet Mr. President."
That implies, that Congress (by way of their "approval") can somehow "make" a parakeet Constitutionally eligible.

To which I responded:

"Congress can not ammend the Constitution by themselves...even if 100% in both houses agree."
Which of course, is fact. And yet, you respond with "No offense but I think a whole bunch of birthers need a civics course."

Amazing.

155 posted on 09/04/2010 7:04:54 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright

” We can all wait for the full, and in-depth,
report from the Lame Stream Media. “

When pigs fly.
I expect the old media to cover for Barry.
What really irks me are those on the right who sneer
at the birth certificate issue.
I am sure that Glen Beck, Ann Coulter , Mark Levin, Bill O’Reilly and others
would all agree that Barry is the most duplicitous, dishonest, shady and shadowy figure ever to occupy the Oval Office.
He’s a pathological liar and megalomaniacal narcissist with a sketchy past.
But, having agreed on all those negative qualities,
the Becks and O’Reilly’s et al find it inconceivable
that Barry would dream of pulling a fast one
regarding his qualifications.
I think that all of Barry’s slimy personal attributes and history actually
make him the perfect candidate to do this.
A person of honor , with nothing to hide , would have had all his records made public the second
the first whiff of impropriety surfaced.
The fact that Barry’s birth certificate and “ original vital records “ are held
under lock and key
by the state of Hawaii is a red flag.
His continued mocking and ridicule of anyone who wonders why these records are still sealed is another red flag
and part of his usual pattern and practice.
I don’t understand why so many on the right refuse to see these red flags ,
apparently don’t have a problem with hidden records
and believe that the most dishonest and devious POTUS in US history is suddenly honest and forthright -but, just on this one single issue.


156 posted on 09/04/2010 7:06:33 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue

I agree with you 100%!!


157 posted on 09/04/2010 7:16:47 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
That implies, that Congress (by way of their "approval") can somehow "make" a parakeet Constitutionally eligible.

No, it states that a sitting president is eligible so long as congress or the voters take no action. There is no other authority that can intervene but congress.

158 posted on 09/04/2010 7:24:03 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

First line of duties:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,

THERE IS NO MENTION OF HIM BEING A CIVILIAN =


159 posted on 09/04/2010 7:24:52 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: omegadawn; Sudetenland

“Congress and the Supreme court has defined Natural born citizenship as being born to parents whom are American citizens.”

False. Congress has said that someone BORN OVERSEAS of 2 American parents is a NBC. The Supreme Court has said anyone born in the US of parents in amity with the US Government is a NBC.


160 posted on 09/04/2010 7:29:13 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson