Skip to comments.
Britain’s Leading Gay Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14
Life Site News ^
| Wednesday September 1, 2010
| Hilary White
Posted on 09/02/2010 12:34:11 PM PDT by GonzoII
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
"this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people."
It will increase their being seduced into perversion.
1
posted on
09/02/2010 12:34:16 PM PDT
by
GonzoII
To: GonzoII
Ah, NAMBLA moves to Britain!!!! Isn’t radical liberalism beautiful?
2
posted on
09/02/2010 12:35:32 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: GonzoII
3
posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:08 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden's new album in the top 5 in the US. Incredible)
To: GonzoII
If we want to protect young people, and I do, the best way to do this is not by threatening them with arrest, but by giving them frank, high quality sex and relationship education from an early age.The real meaning
4
posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:20 PM PDT
by
frogjerk
(I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
To: GonzoII
Here we go - right back down to the stone ages - - the very thing that toppled great nations - the perversions is the big RED FLAG that signals the end...
5
posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:29 PM PDT
by
BCW
(http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
To: GonzoII
Well now, if the age of consent was reduced to zero, then there would be absolutely no sexual crimes against children, ya think?
Moral reprobates.
6
posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:41 PM PDT
by
Manly Warrior
(US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" (my spelling is generally korrect!))
To: GonzoII; wagglebee
Celebrate perversity.
Defining deviancy downwards.
7
posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:48 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GonzoII
“this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people.”
It will increase their being seduced into perversion.
The leftist argument for sexualizing our curriculum here in the states...to make them stronger.
BSTRDS.
8
posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:55 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
("There's only one true Christian liberal in the country and that's Mike Huckabee." - Ann Coulter)
To: GonzoII
I bet he his. Nice, the pervs are so enbolden by their PC pulpit that dare to speak the truth of their desires. Not that there is anything wrong with it.
To: GonzoII
I guess this also would lower the age of consent to 14 for HIV and syphilis
10
posted on
09/02/2010 12:37:33 PM PDT
by
A_Former_Democrat
(NO MOS-que AP: It's the "GROUND ZERO MOSQUE")
To: GonzoII
“saying that this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people”
When they outlaw sex with minors, only outlaws will have sex with minors.
11
posted on
09/02/2010 12:37:40 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GonzoII
Your place in HELL is reserved scumbag..
To: frogjerk
Yep.
“Guilt and shame about sex”
The sex positive agenda (as espoused by Reich, Kinsey, feminists, and SEICUS) pushes an end to ALL moral judgements over ALL sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
Rome didn’t fall in a day.
13
posted on
09/02/2010 12:39:47 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GonzoII; EagleUSA
Bloody Baby BUGGERS!
Pedophiles at it again.
14
posted on
09/02/2010 12:40:18 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: GonzoII
and that is just what the gay agenda is, and always has been, about; removing the age of consent.
15
posted on
09/02/2010 12:40:21 PM PDT
by
dirtymac
(Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Calling all Son's of Liberty)
To: EagleUSA
Now the “gay community” will tell you they should get married but NOT the NAMBLA people. It is now gay vs child rapist - why should one have rights the other does not.
16
posted on
09/02/2010 12:40:48 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(I can't fix stupid.)
To: GonzoII
“Britains Leading Gay Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14”
But we are told not to believe that queers and pedophiles are one and the same.
17
posted on
09/02/2010 12:41:29 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(My coffee creamer is fat free because I am not.)
To: GonzoII
Peter Tatchell about to get one...

18
posted on
09/02/2010 12:43:13 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: GonzoII
Inside every “loving, caring, normal” homosexual lies a predatory beast who desperately wants to sodomize your preschool son.
Even the most ardent homofascist realizes that surrendering to those urges will cross the social boundaries todaybut they’re working on it!
19
posted on
09/02/2010 12:43:22 PM PDT
by
TruthHound
("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
To: GonzoII
A higher age of consent actually puts young teens at greater risk of abuse by reinforcing the idea that young people under 16 have no sexual rights, Tatchell said. They signal that a young person is not capable of making a rational, moral choice about when to have sex. If there is harm caused, it is usually not as a result of sex, per se, but because of emotional abuse within relationships and because of unsafe sex, which can pass on infections and make young girls pregnant when they are not ready for motherhood.
That's kind of an argument FOR abstinence. The sex positive proponents are against abstinence not because it doesn't work but because they see sex as a birthright to be enjoyed by everyone with everything at every age. Not acting on that impulse is "unhealthy".
20
posted on
09/02/2010 12:45:27 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson