To: Hoosier-Daddy
"In that contract it states the President must meet a citizenship requirement. He has not provided supporting documents." Nor has any other President.
The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it?
89 posted on
09/01/2010 4:27:55 PM PDT by
mlo
To: mlo
" The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it? "
You make it sound like he does meet the requirement.
You go on and say that the constitution does not demand or require supporting documents as if the Constitution is the only piece of evidence that anyone born in the USA has to prove that they were born in the USA..... it simply does not work that way.
Most of us have to show documents whether we are applying for a passport, job, bank accounts, so on and so on, and we don't show the US Constitution, how stupid do you think we are ?
A legitimate birth certificate is one of THE, if not, the only way to prove who you are, where you where born, and what date you were born.
Stop giving us the straw man argument that the US Constitution does not require anyone to produce documents of their eligibility of they were running for president, that is a load of liberal CRAP !
You know very well how most people have to prove who they are, and where they are born.
To: mlo
"The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it?"Barack Hussein Obama admits that his father was a foreign national. Natural-born citizenship, as defined by the founding fathers, requires that both parents be citizens to confer such status.
97 posted on
09/02/2010 2:46:07 AM PDT by
Godebert
To: mlo
The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents.But it does require that the President meet an absolute standard of qualification that can be supported by facts presentable as evidence to a court of law. Those can be documents or the testimony under oath of witnesses -- like parents.
What facts capable of being presented to a court of law do you have that prove Obama is an Article II natural born citizen???
101 posted on
09/02/2010 7:08:05 AM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: mlo
You can’t prove anything with a negative. He was certified by Pelosi as meeting the requirements. Where is her proof?
106 posted on
09/02/2010 8:36:05 AM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
To: mlo
Regan did.
they all produced all kinds of documents when asked .. especially prior to the elections. Including military service, college records etc.
Obama above all with his promises of transparency and considering that there has been court cases and almost 6 out of 10 Americans polled have no clue where he was born should step up to the plate instead of dropping 2 million dollars to hide it.
No other president in history has been in doubt as much as Obama. He should produce all his documents for inspection. But he won’t because he is hiding *something* that would embarrass him. The man has no decency, no credibility and no honor.
Lakin deserves a medal for what he is doing. I hope he succeeds.
122 posted on
09/02/2010 9:43:39 AM PDT by
Munz
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson