Replies

" The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it? "

You make it sound like he does meet the requirement.
You go on and say that the constitution does not demand or require supporting documents as if the Constitution is the only piece of evidence that anyone born in the USA has to prove that they were born in the USA..... it simply does not work that way.
Most of us have to show documents whether we are applying for a passport, job, bank accounts, so on and so on, and we don't show the US Constitution, how stupid do you think we are ?
A legitimate birth certificate is one of THE, if not, the only way to prove who you are, where you where born, and what date you were born.
Stop giving us the straw man argument that the US Constitution does not require anyone to produce documents of their eligibility of they were running for president, that is a load of liberal CRAP !
You know very well how most people have to prove who they are, and where they are born.

"Stop giving us the straw man argument that the US Constitution does not require anyone to produce documents of their eligibility of they were running for president, that is a load of liberal CRAP !"

It's not straw man, it's very much to the point. Name one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove he was eligible. Come on, just one.

You can't, because it's never happened. That's the point. There is no requirement for such a thing. The fact that Obama hasn't complied with a non-existant requirement means nothing.