[mlo]

"Stop giving us the straw man argument that the US Constitution does not require anyone to produce documents of their eligibility of they were running for president, that is a load of liberal CRAP !"

It's not straw man, it's very much to the point. Name one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove he was eligible. Come on, just one.

You can't, because it's never happened. That's the point. There is no requirement for such a thing. The fact that Obama hasn't complied with a non-existant requirement means nothing.

[hennie pennie]

>>>> "You can't, because it's never happened. That's the point. There is no requirement for such a thing. The fact that Obama hasn't complied with a non-existant requirement means nothing." <<<<

The mere FACT that YOUR fav prez ain't showing proof as to the precise location of his birth, and the FACT that YOU beloved prez hides every single school record from the American public happens to prove that he is a miserable psychopath who is HIDING the Truth of His OBVIOUS Foreign Birth, and that he's got lots of assistance in his SHAM presidency.

IF you think it "means NOTHING" that nowadays I consider the TOTUS to be a clinical PSYCHOPATH, then you are sadly mistaken.... and so are all the rest of his RINO supporters.

[American Constitutionalist]

" It's not straw man, it's very much to the point. Name one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove he was eligible. Come on, just one. "

Perhaps ? other than President Chester Arthur, that there where no suspicions that they were not natural born, besides ? how do you know for a fact that they didn't show their documents ?
I don't care about the past presidents, we care about the present one.
And no, sorry Obots, just because President Chester Arthur got away with it, does not mean that Obama should.