[American Constitutionalist]

" It's not straw man, it's very much to the point. Name one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove he was eligible. Come on, just one. "

Perhaps ? other than President Chester Arthur, that there where no suspicions that they were not natural born, besides ? how do you know for a fact that they didn't show their documents ?
I don't care about the past presidents, we care about the present one.
And no, sorry Obots, just because President Chester Arthur got away with it, does not mean that Obama should.

[mlo]

You seem to have gotten confused. The claim was that the Constitution required documentation. I asked you to show one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove eligibility, as part of that documentation requirement. You answered with:

"Perhaps ? other than President Chester Arthur, that there where no suspicions that they were not natural born, besides ? how do you know for a fact that they didn't show their documents ?"

Either there's a documentation requirement or there isn't. What anyone suspected is beside the point.

Why not just acknowledge that the constitution has no such requirement and move on?