Won’t that make the cars feel bad about themselves if they get a bad grade?
It’s not fair to the cars, especially the small cars....
huge sarc/
Great news ... then we can hire 40,000 new gubmint drones at 120,000 per to write reports and grade cars ... wonder if Gubmint Motors will get higher scores?
Cripes, can we get these idiots out faster? There will be nothing left.
I want grades for flunky U.S. government bureaucracies.
Why look at that, every Government Motor (GM) car gets an A+ - who would have thunk it? :)
That seems to presume that generating electricity has no environmental cost. I guess burning coal doesn't count if no one is looking.
One thing they could do (and might - I didn't read the whole article yet) is come up with an electrical efficiency standard. How many miles per kilowatt-hour will I get? You could get a poor efficiency electric SUV that just gobbles up the electricity to charge its batteries.
How about a number grade (0 through 100) for Big Government, Presidents and their administrations?
How about we grade Obama - F!
What is the grade for a car manufactured with non-union labor? Man, its good to know hope and change is still proudly marching forward. Imagine the mistakes we would make in buying cars if we didn’t have a government grading scale? I imagine the next thing will be a progressive tax on cars scoring less than A+. That would clearly be progressive and transformative.
The EPA and DOT get an “F” for this.
Every time I think that the obozo administration cannot possibly do anything more stupid than what they have already done I realize how much I have underestimated their collective stupidity.
I will buy cars graded F.
What a SPLENDID opportunity for bribes, graft and other un-taxed payments to “reward” our bureaucratic over-lords!
Government-granted “Grades” have worked SO well in NYC that a roach is never seen in a restaurant, a bed-bug is never found in an hotel room and every graduate of a New York public school is a veritable Einstein!
[Cue: Three Bronx cheers...]
Which brings me to my own decision: Dodge Challenger, Ford Mustang, or Chevy Camaro? Leaning Challenger because it’s so darned good looking, though Mustang may outperform, and Camaro offers similar power for less $.
I think cars that the government thinks are just swell should have a green smiley face on the sticker. The ones that the government thinks are "bad" (H1 Hummer, etc.) can have a red Mr. Yuck.
I'd like to say more, but Ow, My Balls! is on. I gotta go.
I got my “D” car last year, a Lincoln Navigator, because I was afraid I might not be able to get as good a one again. It’s great! I drove it 5,820 miles from Knoxville, TN to the west coast and back this summer.
The guy subbing for Rush talked about this today. For a car to get an A plus it would have to get 117 MPG. How stupid is this? The sooner we get rid of these guys the better.
So the government wants the ability to label consumer items as being “good” or “bad.”
Propaganda, plain and simple.
This goes along with Cass Sunstein's stated goal, which amounts to limitation of freedom of all Americans: "just limit the choices." If all your allowed to buy is Grade "A" or "B" or "C" cars, why, the problem of the eeeeevil SUVs and trucks just goes away.
I also agree with the poster who mentioned the so-called environmental cost of electricity. What's a few tons of coal between friends?