Posted on 08/28/2010 11:05:58 AM PDT by Schnucki
It took a Manhattan taxi driver called Ahmed Sharif to speak out for America, which is being vilified as bigoted and Islamophobic because of the controversy generated by opposition to the so-called "Ground Zero mosque".
The United States was his dream country, he enthused, and he loved New York City. "I feel like I belong here. This is the city actually [for] all colours, races, religion, everyone. We live here side by side peacefully."
Which was a pretty noble sentiment coming from a man whose throat had been slashed by a drunken, deranged passenger who had inquired whether he was a Muslim before pulling out a knife and shouting "Peace be upon you" in Arabic.
As the whole world knows, there is a furore raging over the proposed building of a 15-storey Islamic community centre, containing a mosque, two blocks from Ground Zero, site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks by al-Qaeda.
America's liberal elites have been falling over themselves to denounce their country and fellow citizens as anti-Muslim xenophobes who don't understand that it was not all followers of Islam who were responsible for the atrocities of 2001.
Certainly, some Americans opposed to what is now known as the Park51centre (its previous name of Cordoba centre, a reference to a mosque built in Spain on the site of a Christian church to symbolise a Muslim victory, did not quite strike the right public relations note) are motivated by bigotry.
But it was the centre's Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf himself who linked its purpose to its proximity to the Ground Zero site. It is entirely valid to question whether this is the right approach to building interfaith bridges.
Rauf, who once described the US policies as "an accessory to the crime" of 9/11, stated in Bahrain last week that all the
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Who would listen to him now anyway?
Because he’s an asshole. That’s why.
Because he’s a knee-jerk, blame-America-first lib...er...progressive.
NYC vs. Chicago.
Besides, he hates America and loves the turd-world. Why would an America-hater say anything nice about America?
“Rauf, who once described the US policies as “an accessory to the crime” of 9/11, stated in Bahrain last week that all the “attention is a sign of the success of our efforts” an utterance that shows he is stupid, mischievous or worse.
Even if the aim of building the centre there was to encourage religious understanding, that is clearly no longer a possible outcome. So what kind of success was Rauf referring to?
To want to debate such matters, however, is judged as beyond the pale. Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York tried to shut down discussion by saying that opponents of Rauf’s initiative “ought to be ashamed of themselves”. Presumably, that includes Bangladeshi-born Sharif, who doesn’t support the Park51 centre.
President Barack Obama said that the US constitution guarantees religious freedom (which no one disputes). The American mainstream media and commentariat has stridently and almost uniformly championed Rauf’s cause. In doing so, they’ve happily trashed their fellow Americans, stating they’re motivated only by intolerance.
In fact, most evidence points to the US being one of the most tolerant countries in the world. A poll from you won’t see cited much because it doesn’t fit the prevailing narrative was recently conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute.
It found that 76 per cent of Americans would support Muslims in their community building an Islamic centre or mosque provided they followed the same rules and regulations required of other religious groups. But the 9/11 site is seen as different. After the 9/11 attacks there was no anti-Muslim backlash in the US.
Obama’s ill-judged intervention, and the shrill outrage of his allies in the intelligentsia, has damaged America’s standing in the world by fuelling anti-American stereotypes.
Aides to General David Petraeus, commanding troops in Afghanistan, say he is livid about the portrayal of the US as a hotbed of anti-Muslim bigotry and fears it may undermine the war effort, which is based on partnership with an Islamic regime.
Many Americans are incensed by the way that legitimate protest and questioning of Obama’s policies is routinely branded as racist or ignorant. They are tired of being told what to think and when to think it.
During the 2008 campaign, for instance, you were a bigot if you mentioned Obama’s middle name or his Muslim background. Yet once he was elected, he went to Ankara and Cairo to proclaim that his full name was “Barack Hussein Obama”.
Ahmed Sharif, a victim of real anti-Muslim bigotry, stated that the attack on him was an aberration and that America is a land of tolerance and opportunity. What a shame that Obama, despite his much-vaunted gift with words, appears unable to speak about such things with similar eloquence.”
Great article. Thank you.
“...its previous name of Cordoba centre, a reference to a mosque built in Spain on the site of a Christian church to symbolise a Muslim victory, did not quite strike the right public relations note...”
It’s a lot like the Mexican Flags that at all the illegal booster rallies ... they disappeared after they realized they were shooting themselves in the feet .... cockroaches are the most adaptable of God’s creatures.
Because the issue isnt about tolerance, it's about Muslims trying to declare a symbolic victory on the ashes of 2,752 Americans murdered by their peaceful brethren. They can build it in the Black Hills of North Dakota.
He is not in any meaningful sense an American.
Yeah. It sucks when the truth doesn't quite strike the right public relations note.
Because he is inferior and hates America for what it has achieved even trying to educate his worthless third world rubbish drunk of a father.
Because he doesn’t have any tolerance, he knows not what it means...unless someone writes it on his teleprompTer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.