Hunter will never run and will destroy his own credibility if he decides again.
I wish the best for him, he's a good man, but is long gone as a possible candidate.
Like I've said before, you're the only cultist I know on FR, worshipping a man who can't even beat "unsure" in a primary isn't a good thing.......
That’s a fine argument, as far as it goes. But the corollary is that Rounds/King/Bachmann/DeMint/Bolton etc. would be equally unknown as a Hunter and thus have little chance. In fact, Ive heard that argument made. Unknown or the infamous ‘no executive experience’. So if we end up with a couple of these guys running against the Newt HuckRomlenty’s of the world - should I pick a Newt Huckromlenty because they “can” be nominated? Or are we going to learn from 2008 that media annointed frontrunners are usually a bad thing.