Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom DeLay: I'll win my case, then go after the prosecutor
The Dallas Morning News ^ | 7:44 AM Wed, Aug 25, 2010

Posted on 08/25/2010 11:04:24 AM PDT by BradtotheBone

Tom DeLay says once his money-laundering trial is over - and he expects to win - he intends to go after the public integrity unit that brought his indictment in the first place. Under state law, the Travis County district attorney is authorized to prosecute corruption cases against Texas politicians. It's been doing it for years - prosecuting Attorney General Jim Mattox and House Speaker Gib Lewis (both Democrats) and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (a Republican). But DeLay said Tuesday that when the unit targeted him, it went too far.

The public integrity unit is funded by the state. The way to kill it, presumably, would be to have the Legislature cut its funding. But first things first. DeLay's back in court this week, as we reported today. He's accused of illegally laundering $190,000 in corporate money to elect Republicans in the Texas Legislature in 2002. The maneuver, which he says was legal, gave the GOP a majority in the Texas House for the first time in a century and led to a DeLay-driven redistricting map benefitting Republicans. He, like his defense lawyers, had particularly harsh words for former Travis County DA Ronnie Earle, who brought the indictment in 2005. Earle's retired since then and his predecessor is prosecuting the case. Earle's a Democrat, DeLay's a Republican.

After this is over," DeLay said during a break in a pre-trial hearing in Austin, "we're going after the constitutionality of a locally elected district attorney that can go after federally elected people in Travis County. There's so much unconstitutional in this whole thing. We're not just going to give up with this trial. We're going to reform the justice system that allows this kind of thing to happen."

(Excerpt) Read more at trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: delay; texasgop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2010 11:04:24 AM PDT by BradtotheBone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Go Tom.

Democrats use the legal system to destroy conservatives. It's what forced Sarah Palin to resign the governorship.

2 posted on 08/25/2010 11:05:24 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

I sincerely hope that Tome DeLay fights dirty, unfairly, mean and hard against his enemies. Unless more conservatives are willing to do this, we’ll always lose.


3 posted on 08/25/2010 11:07:14 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The funny thing is that we can use the legal system against progressives.


4 posted on 08/25/2010 11:08:18 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

The legal system? It has become so corrupted.

It’s more like a spider’s web of horror.


5 posted on 08/25/2010 11:08:47 AM PDT by eleni121 (Thank you J-LO for canceling your Turk gig - decent human beings don't sing for rapist Muslim Turks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
The funny thing is that we can use the legal system against progressives.

Yes, let's do like they do and file frivolous charges for the sole purpose of wearing them out.

Let's become what we hate.

6 posted on 08/25/2010 11:14:23 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

maybe he can team up with Blago


7 posted on 08/25/2010 11:14:45 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Gee. I’m sure it is PURELY coincedental that this case which has sat dormant for nearly five years is SUDDENLY brought to life just 70 days before the mid-terms.

“OK, boys, lets fire up the dormant Republican Corruption meme, get that Delay case back on track, ...”

Delay (who has already won 2/3 of this trial by having large segments of it thrown out in court, and the Feds deciding not to proceed with the matching Federal prosecution) will be covered incessently. The news about Conyers wife going to the big house, the continuing revelations about Dodd’s sweatheart loans, etc.... DOWN THE MEMORY HOLE as fast as a news story can free-fall.

I’m sure this is being happily discussed on Journo-list V2.0 where ever that is.


8 posted on 08/25/2010 11:15:55 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Great! The clean-up of the Austin Political Machine is long overdue.


9 posted on 08/25/2010 11:16:55 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Good.

I’m still ticked so many Republicans and conservatives turned on him. The Republicans I understood since you don’t become that powerful without making enemies but conservatives? I know people didn’t like his K-Street projects or strongarming into big government entitlements at Bush’s request but allowing someone to be railroaded out of leadership on trumped up charges is to no one’s credit. Those people should have been ashamed of themselves. If you want someone removed from power, do it the right way. Don’t let the Left use vile means to do it for you.

I hope he wins.


10 posted on 08/25/2010 11:18:19 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

While you are at it; Mr. DeLay, take your hammer and go after Congress and this administration.


11 posted on 08/25/2010 11:18:33 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
we're going after the constitutionality of a locally elected district attorney that can go after federally elected people in Travis County

How is that unconstitutional? Is he suggesting that it's unconstitutional for a cop (who works for the local government) to arrest a Congresscritter for drunk driving or shoplifting or whatever?

12 posted on 08/25/2010 11:18:58 AM PDT by zort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
I sincerely hope that Tome DeLay fights dirty, unfairly,
mean and hard against his enemies.
Unless more conservatives are willing to do this, we’ll always lose.
Well, as much as I'd like to see Delay jump the guy and bite his nipple and hang on until the prosecutor is convicted, I don't think much of the plan to do things as the Democrats do them. This simply gives credence to people who say there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats. Because if there is no difference, what's the use of fighting the ideological battle?
13 posted on 08/25/2010 11:19:27 AM PDT by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

$190k? hell, tim geithner and tom daschle owed more than that in taxes till they were caught cheating. No penalty for them!


14 posted on 08/25/2010 11:20:35 AM PDT by sappy (criminallibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Who said anything about frivolous?

Let me give you an example, I live in New Mexico which has, as a portion of its State Constitution, the following:

Article II, Section 6.
No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms. (As amended November 2, 1971 and November 2, 1986.)
Now there are various State Statutes which violate this, such as one which prohibits firearms on University Grounds. also it throws into question the validity of the signs on the city or county courthouses which say "No Weapons" because, as the last sentence says, "No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms."

Now, I don't know about you, but these seem pretty clear to me... as well as "un-losable," logically speaking. (The problem, IMO, is that of "precedence" which is the legal equivalent of the child's game telephone.)

15 posted on 08/25/2010 11:26:39 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

I just want to see Ronnie Earle take an ass whoopin’!


16 posted on 08/25/2010 11:37:57 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
The funny thing is that we can use the legal system against progressives.

Seems logical. But where are we going to find all those conservative judges? Even the judge who ruled on gay marriage was a Bush 1 appointee. The liberal takeover of the judiciary has been slow, steady, underhanded and stealthy.

17 posted on 08/25/2010 11:39:49 AM PDT by Bernard Marx (I donÂ’t trust the reasoning of anyone who writes then when they mean than.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

Amen!


18 posted on 08/25/2010 11:42:06 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
What are you waiting for?

Shouldn't you be hiring a lawyer and getting at it?

19 posted on 08/25/2010 11:45:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: zort

“How is that unconstitutional? Is he suggesting that it’s unconstitutional for a cop (who works for the local government) to arrest a Congresscritter for drunk driving or shoplifting or whatever?”

I think a better analogy would be if an Austin cop came down to Houston, claimed that he saw someone shoplift in a store in Houston, arrested the individual, and then took the accused back to Austin for trial. And oh, by the way, the cop is known to dislike the individual arrested for shoplifting and the accused “shoplifter” had a receipt for the goods which were claimed to have been stolen.

Can you see a Constitutional issue with that? I can. Several — both Texas and US constitutions.


20 posted on 08/25/2010 11:48:18 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson