Posted on 08/25/2010 10:46:49 AM PDT by pabianice
We MUST dismantle the EPA if America is to survive!
If the EPA passes this regulation, I recommend that we all dutifully comply and turn over all of our ammunition to the EPA as quickly as possible. Very quickly. As in 2600 FPS.
talk about destructive!
>>to ban all traditional ammunition under the Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976, a law in which Congress expressly exempted ammunition.
>
>If this is accurate, then it’s a non-issue. Any conflict between a regulation and a statute, the statute automatically wins. Any such rule would be DOA.
hm, you seem rather knowledgeable in this area. I’d like to ask the question “What is the distinction between ‘Statute’ and ‘Law’?”
You see, there’s a state statute in my state which prohibits firearms on campus (with the exception of inside personal vehicles), and yet there is also a section of the State constitution which reads a follows:
No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.
When I bring it [this contradiction] up to officials I get the run-around; not to mention the deflection of “well, we don’t allow guns in courthouses either.” So it seems that if i am to resolve this I will have to violate the State Statute and challenge its Constitutionality in court as my defense.
The list, ping
all ammo for a while. aren’t primers still made with lead?
What? Only in a revolver at close range. Read the disclaimer. Will not chamber in Match guns. Doesn't function in semi-autos. Not accurate beyond 50 yards. So, just what is it good for?
Frankly I think you’re putting way too much effort into this. You’re going to come to a point where youll be out flanked by laws and statutes. We didnt have a revolution b/c law was being violated...they were coming after the ammo and arms. Ours is a govt by the consent of the people. We can withdraw that consent at any time. Its ours to give or not. The govt is almost entirely inhabited by those who have no qualms about force us to consent. So, we must decide whether we’ll give up being free or not. Its not a question of trying to out maneuver their laws and what not. Its a far more serious game than that.
Will the bullets know their not supposed to leave the barrel?
Oh!...OK....whew!
Thanks for the post.
I said it sucks...
The Left has for years salivated over this as a way to circumvent the 2nd Amendment.
Impossible w/o blood spillage.
I have enough on hand for the Civil War that would erupt.
Dang, those depleted uranium bullets cost an arm and a leg.
yes - lead stybnate
Back door gun control.
The original reason to invest in lead.
So do I, but I prefer to think of it as the second US revolutionary war.
I'd like to add MSHA to this as well!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.