Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter on WND: 'They're a bunch of fake Christians'
WND ^ | August 22, 2010 | WND

Posted on 08/22/2010 3:29:07 PM PDT by RobinMasters

WASHINGTON – Conservative pundit Ann Coulter intensified her attacks on WND last night on Fox News Channel's "Red Eye" show, accusing those at the largest independent news site who dropped her from the "Taking America Back National Conference" in Miami of being "fake Christians."

Coulter claimed she was never actually booked for the event, repeated her resentment over publishing her e-mail explanations to WND Editor Joseph Farah for appearing at GOProud's Homocon event and lashed out at WND for "pushing the birther thing," which she said is not supported by any conservatives.

"These are fake Christians trying to get publicity," said Coulter.

Previously, Coulter called Farah a "publicity whore" and a "swine" for WND's decision to drop her upon learning of her plan to speak to the homosexual Republican group.

In response, Farah issued the following statement: "Coulter called me a 'publicity whore' for my decision. But look who is on television talking about this – throwing mud, name-calling, smearing not only me but my entire staff. I will not engage in the kind of ad hominem attacks that have made Coulter so famous and that are making her even more of a media darling in this age of reckless anger and character assassination for the sake of entertainment. Every day, since we made this decision at WND, I thank God for giving me the clarity of mind and discernment to make the right choice."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; annthemancoulter; christians; coulter; foxnews; homocon; homosexualagenda; libertarians; perverts; redeye; romneysymp; sodomites; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321 next last
To: little jeremiah

I never doubted their goals would be the usual poofter advocacy.

But I do not see it as a given that Ann won’t go in there and chew on them like a rat terrier with a baby rabit, since she has pulled stunts like that since she got into politics.

She could dissapoint, but I am not willing to condemn her before the event, ESPECIALLY if the primary source for labeling her a gay booster is Joseph Farah.

He burned his credibility bridges a long, long time ago.


181 posted on 08/22/2010 8:14:31 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K
Is she married? Have any children? Hanging out with fags and liberals like Lamant Hill.

There is your leftist, Dirty. They always ask those questions to try to diminish her effectiveness. So what if she is married, has children, or not? Leftist Dirty, dirty leftist tactics.

Oh and facts?

You comments are just like leftists..."I hear she...etc." That is a fact? Well, yea to leftists. Anything you "hear" is a fact, huh?

"Sounds like she lives life like a leftist..." LOL, another liberal "fact" we can hang around her neck. Good job, Dirty.

182 posted on 08/22/2010 8:16:26 PM PDT by Syncro (Coulter Emasculation Syndrome strikes again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000; All
Coulter would have done better to keep her mouth under control. The “fake Christians” line isn't clever - in fact it is exceptionally juvenile in this context.

Hell hath no fury as when Ann Coulter is scorned. . .

That said, it IS too bad, she went there. That it is not her 'first time' being 'canceled'; no doubt makes it all harder. And yes, 'fake Christians' will have the Left joyously frothing for weeks - and many Christians, feeling not joyous but rather, angry. . .

As unfortunate as this is; that Ann discredits those who question Obama's authenticity as a legitimate citizen/President only compounds unfortunate. That said; I appreciate Ann's cutting edge analysis; and her sharp wit/humor that nails the truth down tighter than a tick. She takes no prisoners; and without ever moving her hands; she can wipe - in a second - the froth off the lips of any lying Lib. (Which by definition, of coure, is ANY Lib. . .)

We need that. . .and not this. . .

183 posted on 08/22/2010 8:17:16 PM PDT by cricket (Osama - NOT made in the USA. . .and Obama, not made in USA either. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd; little jeremiah
Except that the problem is she's already being cheered for accepting homosexuals because of her appearance at Homocon.

Ann Coulter Applauded by Young Conservatives for 'HomoCon' Speech

"This is how institutions evolve and emerge within a conservative culture," says Jon Henke, a libertarian-leaning blogger. "In time, gay people will be married, extending the valuable social institution of marriage to more people. In time, conservatives will argue that the positive impact that marriage has on the gay community is further evidence of the importance of the institution of marriage."

Change has come gradually, and it's worth noting that Coulter's decision to speak at HomoCon is merely the latest example of prominent conservatives (of all ages) lending, at least, tacit support to the cause of gay rights.

What one generation condones, the next practices.

184 posted on 08/22/2010 8:21:41 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Well I am glad I never paid a penny for Ann Coulter books.

That being said isn’t there something you can go do today/tommarrow or just lift up prayer intentions for those who suffer?

Or are you just going to be the chick chick bow wow of FR on how to Love and Serve the Lord?

Snookie? oh Heck no we got DJ MacWow...


185 posted on 08/22/2010 8:28:08 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Global2010

Have you any debating points?


186 posted on 08/22/2010 8:31:13 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Bumping your ditto.

Can’t butter both side of the bread.

Ann must need some $$$$.


187 posted on 08/22/2010 8:31:19 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck
IIRC, Jonah said there was more to it than just that column, but that approach does seem to be the one to take when one believes (rightly or wrongly) that a columnist has crossed the line.

I'm sure that if this feud is real and Farah does eventually drop Coulter's column from WorldNetDaily, that he will sight other issues besides just this feud between he and Coulter. Similar to the way Jonah Goldberg justified dropping Coulter's column from NRO after 9/11.

He'll probably cite her ongoing attacks against Birthers as another reason why he no longer carries her columns.

I've heard Farah a while ago on the G. Gordon Liddy show state that he has heard from alot of folks questioning why he continued carrying Coulter's column on WND knowing her attacks against Birthers and heard him defend her saying that he wasn't going to throw Coulter overboard over this one issue, but he may have changed his mind now, if this feud with Coulter is real and not staged to get both their names in the news and more hits for their websites.

If you still see Coulter's column being carried on WorldNetDaily two weeks from now, then you will know that this 'feud' was a staged 'feud'. I know if I were Farah and if this feud is real, I would have removed Coulter's column's and any trace of her from WorldNetDaily yesterday.

188 posted on 08/22/2010 8:33:09 PM PDT by AmericaOne (Sneaking In is NOT Immigration!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I like your thinking.

Chaste and serve the Lord is bestes.

Fornication is harmful to the mind/body/soul.
Good diet/sleep will assist one in serving.

Pretty darn simple.

Isn’t it.


189 posted on 08/22/2010 8:35:13 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Global2010
Snookie? oh Heck no we got DJ MacWow...

Check your self pal.

190 posted on 08/22/2010 8:37:31 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

Why does it have to be so Complicated.

Live a simple life and be well.

See tagline.


191 posted on 08/22/2010 8:37:31 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
She used to get good comments from me until she went on her alinsky tear about 'fake Christians' <-- notice that is plural.

Its a fact she isn't married, she has no children, she 'dates' liberals, hanging out with the sodomites, whoring herself out to their cause. And she has the audacity to judge others on their so called 'fake Christianity'.. :::Rolls eyes:::

192 posted on 08/22/2010 8:38:14 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: South40; Southack

I get you two mixed up.

As a woman I bet south40 is the handsome one of the two.

(I am a betting woman)


193 posted on 08/22/2010 8:41:09 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; Global2010

Global2010 is a troll that was supporting homosexuals on another thread until Sandy01 was banned. They are best ignored.


194 posted on 08/22/2010 8:42:53 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
Ann's visit to the homosexals is an endorsement of their "identity", and thus their lifestyles. THAT is un-Christian. Ann should be ashamed.

Man, you must have a good crystal ball, freak. And be completely sinless as you are pure enough to condemn a Christian because of things you make up.

195 posted on 08/22/2010 8:43:50 PM PDT by Syncro (Coulter Emasculation Syndrome strikes again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Well, FR may not be a court of law, but I’m not in the habit of rendering judgment without at least a fig leave of factual basis for doing so, and you have not provided even so much as that, IMHO.

For example, you want me, by default, to reject the credibility of anyone who has not given me a reason to trust them. If that is your premise, why should I trust you? I know far less about you than I do about Farah, correct? And very often I have seen Farah put forward articles that are corroborated by other fact sources and are completely in harmony with my own interpretation of those facts. Whereas you have “Con-Man” built into your name. What am I to make of that fact?

Yet I am willing to extend to you a basic level of trust, until you prove otherwise, as I hope you do me. I don’t know how these anonymous conversation boards could work any other way. So that’s my position on Farah. I’m treating him like I would treat you, and like I would want you to treat me. I have considerable exposure to his views and his treatment of facts and simply don’t see a pattern of deception or venal motives. If they are there, I am willing to see them. Show me. No one is Jesus to me but Jesus. But if you want me to share in your distrust of Farah, simply on your say so, why should I do that, when I know so little about you and so much more about him?


196 posted on 08/22/2010 8:45:54 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Global2010

What’s so complicated about it? Its simple enough that children can comprehend it, well, at least to children who seek the truth honestly..


197 posted on 08/22/2010 8:45:55 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Let Jim Robinson speak for this Grass Roots forum.

You can only give personal commentary.

BTW How many times if any have you divorced, had one two many drinks, fornicated but gave it up?

Gay maraige will never be accepted.
Get it?

Most here do.

It is posters that keep this silly crap alive.

There is a Apple vs. other thread or the anti Catholic thread ...feel needed?


198 posted on 08/22/2010 8:48:22 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: cricket

I liked your post.

cricket chirpings....

stay cool


199 posted on 08/22/2010 8:50:19 PM PDT by Global2010 (I don't want to comment on that I'll let the other geniuses do that..James Caan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K
My you are so sensitive.

I hope you don't have a wife or kids.

One wrong move, and it seems you will berate them with false accusations, girls you will call little whores.

LOL you don't get Coulter.

She didn't judge anyone, she made a STATEMENT and you got your panties all in a bunch and viciously judged her.

You do realize that your posts here show you whoring yourself out to Farah and all the leftists that are eviscerating Coulter and by extension Conservatism. You have a good internet name, DIRTY!

200 posted on 08/22/2010 8:51:28 PM PDT by Syncro (Coulter Emasculation Syndrome strikes again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson