Ann Coulter on WND: 'They're a bunch of fake Christians'

WND ^ | August 22, 2010 | WND

[RobinMasters]

WASHINGTON – Conservative pundit Ann Coulter intensified her attacks on WND last night on Fox News Channel's "Red Eye" show, accusing those at the largest independent news site who dropped her from the "Taking America Back National Conference" in Miami of being "fake Christians."

Coulter claimed she was never actually booked for the event, repeated her resentment over publishing her e-mail explanations to WND Editor Joseph Farah for appearing at GOProud's Homocon event and lashed out at WND for "pushing the birther thing," which she said is not supported by any conservatives.

"These are fake Christians trying to get publicity," said Coulter.

Previously, Coulter called Farah a "publicity whore" and a "swine" for WND's decision to drop her upon learning of her plan to speak to the homosexual Republican group.

In response, Farah issued the following statement: "Coulter called me a 'publicity whore' for my decision. But look who is on television talking about this – throwing mud, name-calling, smearing not only me but my entire staff. I will not engage in the kind of ad hominem attacks that have made Coulter so famous and that are making her even more of a media darling in this age of reckless anger and character assassination for the sake of entertainment. Every day, since we made this decision at WND, I thank God for giving me the clarity of mind and discernment to make the right choice."

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Link is broken..

The requested document does not exist on this server.

[Syncro]

Next she’ll be promoting the Ground Zero mosque.

Only if they let homosexuals party there.

[aSeattleConservative]

Back to the old copy and paste.

http://americansfortruth.com/news/were-all-homophobes-now-letter-to-foxs-red-eye.html

[Syncro]

Your comment is full of assumptions based upon
upon your biased view of Coulter.

It shows you are not familar at all with Coulter and where she speaks and how she handles different people at the varied venue at which she speaks.

You are the one that is conceptually challenged and seem to like to project your CES inspired conclusions upon Coulter and how she will preform when she speaks to various groups.

Using your tainted logic, Coulter supports liberalism as the colleges at which she speaks are full of them.

Oh, don't ever go into a starbucks, freak.

[Julia H.]

I see. Where in the Bible does God outlaw speaking to homosexuals?

[SW6906]

Wow, 142 posts and no pictures of Ann.

We used to have rules here on FR. I miss the good old days.....

[AmericaOne]

I’m beginning to think it’s a co-ordinated dog-and-pony show to get them both more attention.

Hunton Peck, you may be onto something. You would think that Farah would no longer be carrying Coulter's column on WorldNetDaily, but as of now, they are still carrying her weekly Wednesday column. Check the link below:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=46

You would think that if this was a real feud between Farah and Coulter, the first thing Farah would do would be no longer carrying Coulter's column and remove any and all traces of her from the WorldNetDaily website.

I assume Farah is paying Coulter or her agency fees to feature her weekly columns at WorldNetDaily. You would think if he is really feuding with Coulter, that he would sever this business relationship with her immediately, but as of now, he apparently hasn't.

I may be wrong, but like you said, this is starting to sound like it may well be a PR stunt between the two to get more attention for both of them.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Ignore these two...they have outlived their usefulness. Thank them for their past service to the cause and move on.

Yep.

[DJ MacWoW]

If he wants to hate her because she doesn’t hate gays is ridiculous.

Disapproval is not hatred.

[Digger]

Ann is not going to homocon to preach the Word, nor to counsel the homos on the error of their ways. She is going to celebrate with them and endorse their organization. That is directly opposite what Jesus did. Jesus did not visit sinners to celebrate their sin. He went to them to guide them out of sin. Big, big difference. Your comparison is completely invalid.

Yep. I'll have to take Ole Joe's side on this one.

[DJ MacWoW]

Where in the Bible does God outlaw speaking to homosexuals?

Where did Jesus tell anyone to support them? He came to save sinners, not entertain them. And he did it for free.

[A_Cougar]

Personally, I’m glad she’s going.
I was never a fan but am liking her more now.

[tlb]

>>> Thou shall not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Leviticus 18:22 KJV

Did it ever occur to you the Bible is there telling women never to have sex with men, but only with other women. For to do a dude is an abomination.

Probably has something to do with them never putting the toilet seat back down.

btw, if you read the rest of Leviticus, that guy made rules of lots of nasty and strange stuff. Such as:

“Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property.” (Leviticus 25:44-45)

People justified slavery as the word of God based on that.

“Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.” (Leviticus 19:27)

How’s your hair? Is it Holy?

“...and the swine, though it divides the hoof, having cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud, is unclean to you.” (Leviticus 11:7)

Had any bacon lately ?

“...do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear material woven of two kinds of material.” (Leviticus 19:19)

Imagine going to Hell cause you wore a cotton/wool blend sweater.

“Whatever in the water does not have fins or scales; that shall be an abomination to you.” (Leviticus 11:12)

Eternal damnation for a Longjohn Silver’s Seafood shrimp platter. Tough love.

And more.

If you base your philosophy on one verse of Leviticus you’re stuck with it all. Just sayin’.

and Farrah is a jerk.

[DJ MacWoW]

Unless she’s going to tell them they lifestyle is wrong, a conservative doesn’t belong headlining at a liberal agenda convention.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

How old is the old skinny whore? Is she married? Have any children? Hanging out with fags and liberals like Lamant Hill.. I hear she dated Bill Mayher.. Sounds like she lives life like a leftist and hasn't got a clue about Christianity, other than to toss out some alinsky tactics..

[DJ MacWoW]

If you base your philosophy on one verse of Leviticus you’re stuck with it all. Just sayin’.

Where did Jesus rescind the law against sexual immorality?

[Revel]

Ditto.

[little jeremiah]

Sigh. Where’s the “Not This S*** Again” poster?

You are equating “hate” with “not being in favor of the homosexual agenda”. That is a standard homosexual agenda talking point designed to shut up the opposition. Do you also think people who are opposed to the homosexual agenda are “bigots”?

I care about homosexuals - I want them first of all, to stop killing each other with AIDS and other diseases which are rampant due to their unhealthy and unnatural sexual practices and their high level of promiscuity.

Second, I want them to hear the truth - that they don’t have to be “gay”, and that there are many former homosexuals. There is hope for them.

Many of us know homosexuals. You are assuming that which you know nothing about.

[little jeremiah]

Do you like hate crimes laws?

Hate speech laws?

Laws forcing people to take photos of homosexuals at a same sex “wedding” even if it against their beliefs and principles?

Homosexual sex ed taught to children in grade school? What to speak of high school? Contacts where they can meet with homosexuals and learn the “gay” life?

Homosexuals in the military?

[Syncro]

Ignore these two...they have outlived their usefulness.

One had, until he discovered he could get some attention by bad mouthing Coulter. And he has been quite useful in bringing her much free publicity!

The leftists are hoping they can sway more people like you to start ignoring Coulter. No prob, those that "get" Coulter will not ignore her, but instead continue to appreciate her timely acerbic political commentary.

And she will continue to have a strong conservative influence on the political climate.