Posted on 08/22/2010 5:39:42 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Carrier to avoid drill in Yellow Sea
August 21, 2010
The U.S.S. George Washington, a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, will not take part in the second of a series of the combined military drills between South Korea and the United States following the Cheonan sinking, the UN Command said yesterday.
An initial plan to mobilize the 97,000-ton aircraft career in the drill, scheduled to be held in the Yellow Sea early next month, drew strong protest from China, leading some to worry about a physical confrontation between the world’s superpowers.
“The George Washington is not scheduled to participate in this ASW [anti-submarine warfare] exercise,” the UN Command said in a statement.
The UN Command added that the George Washington will be mobilized for future exercises and operate in the waters off the Korean Peninsula, but did not specify the Yellow Sea, suggesting it will be kept out of the waters near China.
The first combined drill following the Cheonan sinking, dubbed “Invincible Spirit,” and held between July 25-28, involved the George Washington, but only in the East Sea after a hostile Chinese response to a ASW drill in the Yellow Sea.
Asked why the plan to dispatch the George Washington to the Yellow Sea was changed, an official from the UN Command said, “Nothing had been decided about it, so it is not a change.”
The official stressed that the drill is defensive by nature and is designed to send a message of deterrence to North Korea.
Local analysts such as Lee Nae-young, an international relations professor at Korea University, said China's response obviously affected the decision.
Beijing reacted angrily to the planned Yellow Sea drill by Seoul and Washington, with the People's Liberation Army Daily warning of a physical response in an editorial last week.
“If someone harms me, I must harm them,” the editorial warned.
Many observers, however, said the U.S. decision not to send the George Washington was not a fear of China but a strategic choice.
“The U.S. has several issues in which it needs cooperation from China such as sanctioning Iran and pushing North Korea toward denuclearization,” said Jun Byoung-kon, a China expert at the Korea Institute for National Unification.
Said Lee Tai-hwan, a researcher at the Sejong Institute: “The U.S. appears to have judged that it is better to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding.”
I wonder if South Korea’s reluctance to back sanctions against Iran is playing a role here? I would think it very unlikely - in all probability, this is a concession to China - but not impossible. Obama has sent “tune up” messages to allies before, after all (enjoying those DVD’s Mr. Brown?).
“even some pirates in row boats”
Seem to remember something about SEALS blowing some heads off. I forget who was CiC at the time...
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
We had a President like that. We will again.
.................RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bring on Chris Christie!
Travels like a puffy!
I think their(China) planning a war with us...
Thanks TigerLikesRooster, no thanks Zero.
Uhhh, yeah .... uh, I've been meaning to ask ......
How's that going for us?!!
</s>
Erwin Rommel once said that learning is a lot easier than re-learning. Just ran across that one in my Patton biography last night.
Appropriate that this takes place in the Yellow Sea.
“Teaching the Chinese how to act like civilized human beings at the global level is going to be even harder than teaching the moslems. And we have a president who doesn’t even know the lesson plan.”
If by “civilized human beings” you meant humble subordinates of the American empire, then I think it will be very difficult indeed. The Chinese doesn’t bow down to any nation.
They certainly don’t bow down to countries which, require huge loans on a regular basis and buy huge amounts of necessities from them, just to survive. Such countries are dependent upon them.
Good idea on our part; considering the SIZE of their Navy vs Ours!
And when was it decided that China is now a ‘superpower’, and who decided it?
http://www.janes.com/news/defence/naval/
“Carrier to avoid drill in Yellow Sea(Obama caves)”
As expected. Was there ever any doubt he would cave?
I think "deference", rather than "deterrence", would be more correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.