[Ol' Sparky]

This column pretty illustrates what many here are denying -- that Coulter speaking before this group gives it and its agenda legitimacy and honest pro-homosexual "conservative" types are open about that fact.

[Carley]

What next, a speech to NARAL.

She’s following in Ted Olson’s footsteps.

Sad to say the least.

[Dr. Sivana]

The same logic could be applied to addressing NAMBLA. Of course, NAMBLA is never, to my knowledge disinvited to homo marches of any kind.

[RaceBannon]

I cannot support her on this at all.

[EyeGuy]

Ah, Coulter as mercenary, soldier of of fortune.

Following out her logic, “They’re paying me to give a speech”: how much would it take in cold hard cash for her to join the Islamic jihad, “I mean, you know, they are paying me to fight so I’m going to fight.”

[EternalVigilance]

Ann lost her moorings a couple of years ago, when she began to moon over the most liberal Governor in the history of the republic, Mitt Romney, and to twist the truth to defend the indefensible. Sad. And now, predictably, she keeps heading further out to sea.

[Da Coyote]

I’m right wing as h*ll.

Yup, even have a gay friend - no snide comments, I’m happily married.

He makes me look like a lib....so sexual persuasion does not necessarily correlate with political persuation.

I have no problems with Anne speaking at any convention - she can take care of herself (unlike our Loon-O-dent).

[EternalVigilance]

They’re corrupting the young. Nothing the least bit conservative about that.

[This Just In]

Ms. Coulter is an intelligent woman, but I have lost some respect for her. Ann Coulter’s decision to speak at this event has reduced her to an entertainer rather than a public voice for conservative issues.

Most unfortunate.

[muawiyah]

Ann is wasting her time ~ beyond that necessary to cash their check. What goes on in all the homosexual groups is there is an excess of ego and a deficit of id ~ to the extent any rational psychotherapist would diagnose virtually every one of them as suffering from narcissism.

People like that don't care what you say ~ EVER.

[Eagles6]

Ann is wrong on this one.

[Stalwart]

Why, yes.

Carlson, Beck, Norquist, Cupp, Henke, ... The list goes on and on in that article.

Not a conservative among the entire lot, yet they deign to define our values.

[Rastus]

S.E. Cupp, conservative columnist and author of "Losing Our Religion: The Liberal Media's Attack on Christianity."

Didn't know she wrote a book like that. She's an athiest and I've seen her make a few knocks against Catholics on her site. I have no interest in her defending me.

[Matchett-PI]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2570385/posts?page=513#513

[circlecity]

I’ve made a deal with Ann, she does’t tell me which web sites to frequent and I don’t tell her where to give speeches. Works great.

[jimt]

This column pretty illustrates what many here are denying -- that Coulter speaking before this group gives it and its agenda legitimacy and honest pro-homosexual "conservative" types are open about that fact.

Crap.

This column pimps for that idea, nothing more.

The quote from the "libertarian" guy is nauseating. Again it's a matter of taking parts of libertarian arguments out of context.

Do libertarians support the idea of homosexual "marriage" ? You bet. BUT...

The government would not be involved in ANY way.
NO ONE would be forced to recognize homosexual "marriage".
ANYONE could refuse to hire, associate with, rent to, sell to or do business with ANY homosexual. Freedom of association would be entirely legal.
NO homosexual would have ANY special rights whatsoever.

The out-of-context libertarian arguments don't make sense without "libertopia", where there's no welfare, no public housing, virtually no taxes, etc.

The fact that Ann is speaking to a homosexual group DOES NOT imply approval. If she says something that implies approval, I'll change my mind.

Meanwhile, am I required to diss my homosexual next door neighbors ?

[BraveMan]

You haven’t heard a single word yet, yet you’re casting summary judgement on the whole event . . . WTF?

[Hunton Peck]

I’d kind of like to hear (or read) what Ann says to the group before concluding that she’s sold out. For all we know she may blast their lifestyle. On the other hand, she may use the opportunity to announce her engagement to Rachel Maddow. We’ll find out soon enough. But I don’t see any reason to jump to conclusions.

[Antoninus]

Young people are supposed to be foolish and easily led by propaganda.

There's no excuse for someone of Ann Coulter's age. She's succumbing to the perpetual adolescent outlook of the ruling elite.

[throwback]

She’s wrong unless she goes and tells them something that they don’t want to hear which Ann has been known to do occasionally.

[truthandlife]

I will not listen to what Coulter says this day forward.

She might have a job at the Huffington Post very soon. Don’t be surprised.