Oh well, she has a chance of redemption with McQueeg.
CNN gloats, but ignores the Obama kiss of Kenyan death with DemCommies.
News organization? LOL.
how did these guys do?
The GOP is still sweating it- since they have to spend money to win OVER OTHER GOP candidates.
This is still something they never had to contend with before.
They tried to ignore it when she was on a winning streak, so I’ll simply ignore THEM now...
Rossi would be easier to beat then Didier.
Her candidate lost here in Georgia and I am glad.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 222–230
If it were easy, we wouldn't have the Congress filled with RINO's....the money is poured into keeping the good ol' boy networks intact, and the legislation to pay back the supporters' interests, NEVER The Peoples' intersts.
Yeah....
But wait....how does this work with the, “if McCain wins, it’s all Palin’s fault” crowd?
Luckily Palin’s shine worked to defeat Tom Campbell in California.
The reason Palin endorsed Fiorina was to stop Tom Campbell, who before the endorsement seemed to be the easy winner of the primary.
Voting started in 6 days and Tom Campbell was well ahead with 35% of the vote, and climbing.
“Campbell supports abortion rights and gay marriage, and argues that Boxer’s greatest asset against either of his two Republican opponents, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina and state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, would be the state’s decidedly un-conservative social views.
“She has always been able to move the debate over to the social issues. She will not be able to do that against me,” Campbell told POLITICO.”
“During the campaign for U.S. Senate in 2000, Campbell touted his 100 percent pro-choice voting record. He opposed a ban on “partial birth’ abortions, one of the most horrific abortion practices. (”Conservatives Agonize Backing Campbell,” Roll Call, August 7, 2000.)
Campbell in 1992 made abortion the center stage of his campaign. In the 1992 election, Campbell’s TV ad ran with the following caption: “For choice, for jobs, for U.S. Senate.” In another ad, he said, “I’m pro-choice and one of the most conservative members of Congress when it comes to spending.”In a Republican debate, he described his abortion views, as good for voters “looking for someone who is willing to break with the party line from time to time.” (Gerry Braun, “Herschensohn Won’t Pledge to Back GOP Pick; Senate Opponents Renew Acrimony in Last Debate,” San Diego Union Tribune, June 1, 1992.)
Dino Rossi is an establishment in WA. Didier was a longshot to begin with. Guess she will be no help in the General.
Pray for America
Mouth-breather CNN can’t understand that Palin is doing it right, making statements in the primaries.
In-fighting among the Democrats never seems to hurt them, but it destroys the Republican chances. She is doing the right thing - it’s not a score card deal.
How did I know this was a “pissant” post before even looking down at the FR name?
As far as the Didier endorsement, it came BEFORE Rossi through his hat in the ring.
CORRECTION: I meant CA an SC primaries in post #1
Yes, Sarah had the cojones enough to come out and endorse people. Whether they were successful or not, since she can’t see the future. And for this, she must be whipped? I guess it’s that old ‘keep women in their place’ thing, huh? Sounds very ‘Islamic’.
I did a Google search for Palin and it came back with “pissant”.
Pissant, you’re making your point using CNN as your source?
I respect your views concerning Sarah Palin, but I can’t take this thread seriously with a source like CNN. They’re about as balanced as the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
However, now you're carrying CNN's water for them.
There is no acceptable excuse for that.