Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Then, he called the dispatch office for the Pueblo Sheriff's Department, where he works. Finally, a hit. The dispatcher was able to find the name of the Denver officer who had run a criminal background check on his son, a check that showed a clean past.

The father called that Denver officer and learned his son had been arrested for resisting arrest and had been sent to Denver Health Medical Center. The charge was later dropped.

"Your son got a little road rash on his nose," he recalls the officer telling him.

Here's the road rash:


1 posted on 08/18/2010 10:10:47 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Fundamentally Fair

I’m missing something here. The kid was admittedly drunk. Why the aggression by the cops?


2 posted on 08/18/2010 10:14:14 AM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

I have a question about bad cop behavior in general. Is it mostly urban law enforcement that perpetrates such atrocities on the public or do rural sheriff deputies act equally poorly?

I need to advise that I make a distinction between rural area sheriff depts and urban or metro area sheriff depts. Having grown up in a rural area that is now overrun with urban cockroaches, I make a very big distinction between the two.


3 posted on 08/18/2010 10:15:55 AM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair
  FBI Looks Into Alleged Denver Police Beating 

Michael's father, Anthony DeHerrera, said he could hear the altercation for seven minutes through the phone's open line.

"The last thing I heard is, 'We have to get rid of the phone, they're recording us.' And then the phone went dead," he said.

4 posted on 08/18/2010 10:16:59 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (Bush: Mission Accomplished. Obama: Commission Accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

Isn’t it interesting how a change in perspective can expand awareness? My, my.


5 posted on 08/18/2010 10:17:02 AM PDT by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

The family hired lawyers, and received a $17,500 settlement.


7 posted on 08/18/2010 10:18:25 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair
I just love the way the video camera backed off and turned when the a@@kicking started.

wow, just peachy. Now what is this about NOT video taping cops. The ONLY protection you have against rogue cops is the public eye on them. They shouldn't be ashamed of anything they do on duty unless it's beating the cr#p out of a weakling or girl, planting dope, faking disability in order to up their pensions, getting blow jobs from hookers for protection payment or just ripping off drug dealers.

In fact video taping cops helps the good cops.

11 posted on 08/18/2010 10:23:09 AM PDT by erman (democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LEO

"OINK! OINK!"

GRUNT! SQUEEL!


12 posted on 08/18/2010 10:23:50 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

I would have to see the whole video, before I could even have a chance at a ball park observation here.

This may have been a decent kid. It appears he didn’t have a criminal record. Did he act out here? Did the officers feel the need to send a message.

If the officers did think a message needed to be sent, this wasn’t the way to go about it.

My first inclination is to support the officers. Sadly, that is a position that can’t always be sustained. In this instance, it appears there is a real problem here.

Public employees SHOULD NOT be able to form unions.

Here is a conflict of interest. The good of the public is not served by defending officers who have beaten a suspect.

This kid should have been taken into custody without incident. I’d have to see the video to fully understand why he wasn’t.

Either there is something I’m not seeing here, or the officer seriously screwed up. If they did, they abused this young man under color of authority.

We see this sort of thing over and over. It appears there needs to be a re-education of officers. If there is a problem, we’ll back you when you try to get things back under control. If you abuse your authority, we’ll help put you behind bars for a long time.

Officers, I want to support you. Please make it possible for me to do so. Beating kids around the head for no reason (if that’s what took place here), is no way to gain my or the public’s at large support.


15 posted on 08/18/2010 10:27:22 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (UniTea! It's not Rs vs Ds you dimwits. It's Cs vs Ls. Cut the crap & lets build for success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

There is no way you can have a positive relationship with someone who is sanctioned to lie to you but will arrest you for the same.


18 posted on 08/18/2010 10:29:49 AM PDT by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

They beat him because he was Hispanic—plain and simple.


22 posted on 08/18/2010 10:32:39 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

A clip every teen should watch!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8


42 posted on 08/18/2010 10:56:46 AM PDT by Big_Harry ( Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

Boom towns have less cops. Safe towns have less cops. Here’s my findings. Stick with them.

(1) Cops cause crime.

(2) More Cops means more crime.

(3) Less cops means less crime.

(4) Cops do not lower crime.

I put the seemingly least defensible finding on top. But it’s true too. Since I have confidence in the underlying truth of my findings I will not provide further evidence or argument for them. Truth has a way of arguing for itself very well once it is remarked upon.


47 posted on 08/18/2010 10:58:53 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

And the most sickening thing of all was the in house police ‘investigation’ who determined that excessive force was not used in this instance.


50 posted on 08/18/2010 11:01:12 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

Bad cops are no friends to good police work, good police forces or good communities. If all cops understood that there would be no “blue line” of defense shielding them, just because they were “one of their own”. Instead, the good cops would make sure their own units DISOWN them.


54 posted on 08/18/2010 11:08:35 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair
Look on the bright side...at least in Denver you're protected from these...

56 posted on 08/18/2010 11:10:02 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair

These cops need to be fired and prosecuted.


62 posted on 08/18/2010 11:53:40 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fundamentally Fair
Michael's 4-year-old niece still doesn't understand. Police officers are the good guys, she says, searching for an explanation from the grandfather.

This is a reality check. Cops are not your friends and way too many of them are dishonest and corrupt.

64 posted on 08/18/2010 12:03:45 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson