Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; FromLori; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ...
RE :”If they don't win a veto-proof Senate, they can't undo Obamacare but the House alone can refuse to fund any part of it. There are numerous blocking tactics that a Republican-controlled House can take against those hell-bent on trampling on our Constitution. The question is whether they will have guts and principle to do it. After all, many Americans, including those who are Republicans, have a stake in big government control, special privileges and handouts.

Dream on! It all depends on the political winds. Right now democrats cant escape blame and try as they might, are not getting points for running up debts without real job creation. Next year, who knows ? What we do know is Republicans are not telling us much about themselves(for obvious reasons). And Democrats don't want to talk about themselves either.

2 posted on 08/18/2010 5:58:44 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

We know Dems won’t stop spending. Throw the bums out and then hold their feet to the fire.

Pray for America


5 posted on 08/18/2010 6:04:55 AM PDT by bray (A FReeper book http://www.brayincandy.com/id239.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs; Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; TommyDale; hoosiermama; ...
Why the Health Care Bill Could Be Repealed
Real Clear Politics ^ | March 30, 2010 | Sean Trende
FR Posted by BradtotheBone

The punditocracy has recently been consumed with a debate over whether or not the Republicans will be able to repeal the recently-passed health care bill. Outside of self-professed conservative pundits, the conventional wisdom seems to be that the odds are prohibitively against repeal (or significant modification).

This Politico article typifies the attitude of those who doubt that repeal can be effectuated. It argues that the current outrage over the health care bill is merely a part of a "familiar pattern since New Deal days: Government programs from Social Security to Medicare that were launched amid incendiary arguments within a short time became sacrosanct - protected by a bipartisan consensus that was nowhere to be found at passage."

This is certainly one possible outcome for the President's health care bill, but it isn't the only one. Here is why repeal is a real possibility. 1. This bill is substantively different than Social Security and Medicare.

My colleague Jay Cost made a critical point a few days ago: Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson made use of an ingenious social insurance system - promoting the idea that we all pay in today to take out tomorrow. It was consistent with American individualism. It was simple. It was intuitive. It was bipartisan.

Obama's new system has none of those virtues. This feature is what makes repealing or substantially modifying Social Security and/or Medicare so difficult. They are entitlements that are broadly given to the middle class, who also pays for them. To the extent these programs are redistributive, that redistribution is largely hidden. Everyone, from the poorest member of society to Bill Gates, has some stake in Social Security and Medicare.(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...

===========================================

The Constitution is the limiting document upon the feds; the federal government cannot become greater than the granting power. That is, the federal servant cannot become greater than its master........the states.

.......according to judicial analyst, and judge, Andrew P. Napolitano healthcare reforms amount to "commandeering" the state legislatures for federal purposes, which the Supreme Court has forbidden as unconstitutional. "The Constitution does not authorize the Congress to regulate state governments.

Nevertheless, the Congress has told the state governments that they must modify their regulation of certain areas of healthcare, they must surrender their regulation of other areas of healthcare, and they must spend state taxpayer-generated dollars in a way that the Congress wants it done.(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com............

16 posted on 08/18/2010 6:22:27 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs; Man50D; bray; FrankR; Night Hides Not; Republic of Texas; Condor51; GOPJ; ...
Will Republicans Save Us? Democrats can't escape blame for the economy; try as they might, they are not getting points for running up debts without job creation. Democrats don't want to talk about themselves ......and Republicans are not telling us much, either.....

There's a saying in Republican politics: when your opponent is committing political suicide, it's not polite to step in and help him.

24 posted on 08/18/2010 6:44:52 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs

” There are numerous blocking tactics that a Republican-controlled House can take against those hell-bent on trampling on our Constitution. The question is whether they will have guts and principle to do it. After all, many Americans, including those who are Republicans, have a stake in big government control, special privileges and handouts “

I’ll believe it when I see it.


37 posted on 08/18/2010 7:19:08 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs
Will Republicans Save Us?

No. Next question?

I'm starting to get depressed again...

96 posted on 08/18/2010 11:19:41 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (I'm never fully dressed without a snark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson