Posted on 08/16/2010 7:09:21 AM PDT by LorenC
Last week on the White House's YouTube channel, they answered a question from the mailbag and showed this:
Date of Birth: 04 Aug 1961
Place of Birth: Hawaii, U.S.A.
So what do you expect the conspiratorial response to this will be? That it's a fake passport? That the U.S. Passport office is in on the conspiracy? That YouTube videos aren't admissible in court, and thus this should simply be ignored and not acknowledged as evidence at all? That there's not an uninterrupted shot of the trip advisor unlocking the safe, taking out the folder, and pulling out and opening the passport, and thus they aren't convinced that the passport seen was actually in the folder?
Or maybe just a mix of all of the above, plus whatever other special pleading they can think of.
What you’re doing amounts to begging me to give you a way to make a compelling argument. I’ve explained the deficiencies in your argument already, so it’s up to YOU to figure out how to address those deficiencies.
Certifigate keeps getting hotter! And the after-birthers can’t stand it. You probably know all of this, but I bet it feels good to ‘hear’ it repeated:
CNN poll on Obama: 6 of 10 doubt U.S. birth story
http://www.kltv.com/Global/story.asp?S=12932570
Why Pelosi Signed Two Certificates of Nomination
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2585683/posts
“Why did the Hawaii Democratic Party refuse to certify Obama’s eligibility?”
BO’s [missing] Kindergarten records would have included verification of his BC. And there’s more. Please note LucyT’s post 33:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2584059/posts?page=33#33
It’s damxing as heck.
Here’s the research address:
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaEducation.htm#PreSchool
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.