Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain says he doesn't back 14th Amendment change
Associated Press ^ | August 13, 2010 | BOB CHRISTIE

Posted on 08/13/2010 11:00:01 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

PHOENIX (AP) -- Sen. John McCain says he does not support changing the Constitution to end automatic citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.

The Republican Arizona senator told The Associated Press that despite the current flurry of news stories on the topic and a statement he made last week that was widely interpreted as saying he supported hearings on the matter, he remains unconvinced that such a change is needed.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; aliens; mccain; smokeandmirrors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 08/13/2010 11:00:02 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I don’t either. The constitution is not the problem, the gov. sitting on its hands is.


2 posted on 08/13/2010 11:01:38 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

How IS this old bastard doing in the polls in Arizona for the primary?

HAve Arizonans recovered their sanity yet and swung towards Hayworth?


3 posted on 08/13/2010 11:02:02 AM PDT by ZULU (God, guts and guns made America great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
But I see your true colors shining through ... Cyndi Lauper
4 posted on 08/13/2010 11:02:24 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I’ll bet a big majority of his constituents disagree with him on this. But when has that ever mattered to Mr Ego?


5 posted on 08/13/2010 11:02:36 AM PDT by csmusaret (A government that can dictate how much water flows into a toilet is a powerful government indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

McLame is really insane.


6 posted on 08/13/2010 11:04:05 AM PDT by Commander X (TOTUS...destroying the USA one lie at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I would like John, or anyone else for that matter, to tell me why we are the only nation in the world to provide citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants?


7 posted on 08/13/2010 11:06:13 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Photobucket Big surprise. We may not need to change it, merely redifine how it is interpreted.
8 posted on 08/13/2010 11:07:48 AM PDT by xuberalles (The Right Stuff: The Best Anti-Liberal Novelties On The Net ! http://www.zazzle.com/xuberalles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

We don’t need to change the constitution we need to write a law defining what was intended by the 14th amendment.


9 posted on 08/13/2010 11:08:25 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Not for nuthin’, but the constitution doesnt say that, and neither do many of the cases and statutes say it either.

The key phrase is “under the jurisdiction of the US.” Someone who is not a citizen, nor a person here legally, is not under the jurisdiction of the United States.”

If we enforced the laws, as they have been written and codified, we would be all set.


10 posted on 08/13/2010 11:08:48 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I lived in VT for four years. That was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

“I don’t either. The constitution is not the problem, the gov. sitting on its hands is.”

The only reason it is a media issue now is because the wage depression lobbyists thought it might be a good hook to bring back “comprehensive” immigration reform. The attitude is, let’s give the yahoos this red meat on the 14th Amendment so we can have our super amnesty.

Not that the public relations types really believe that, but they know decrepit people like Lindsay Graham would believe that. When Graham supported it his face was full of snark, like he found the golden bullet that will subdue us yahoos.


11 posted on 08/13/2010 11:09:44 AM PDT by Shermy (Q: Who is John Galt?! A: Alan Greenspan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
The key phrase is “under the jurisdiction of the US.”

BINGO!

12 posted on 08/13/2010 11:13:02 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (We are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo screwed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Since there are no first generation slaves alive anymore, the 14th ammendment is unnecessary.


13 posted on 08/13/2010 11:16:51 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (Germans in 1932 thought they were voting for change too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
That's not going to help one bit. We have the Federalist Papers and volumes of writing from the Founding Fathers, explaining the Constitution and how our government was supposed to work. How well have they been followed?

The very nature of politicians, especially this current Leftist crop, is to get around the law by any means necessary, often by simply ignoring it and banking on the fact that We the Sheeple won't notice, or won't care if we do. They need to be shackled to the law, and not given one inch of wiggle room.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

14 posted on 08/13/2010 11:18:50 AM PDT by wku man (Steel yourselves, patriots, and be ready. Won't be long now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

McCain is such a disingenuous prick.

He knows we’ll never get that border under control as long as we do not utilize interior enforcement, and we do extend perks to the illegal immigrant.

If he had addressed misinterpretation, that would also be helpful, but this guy does not have our nation’s best interests at heart.

He doesn’t bother himself with the finer points of anything that doesn’t conform to his world view.

Arizona, please, I beg of you, for the good of your state and our nation, retire this friend to Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, George Soros, and Vietnam.


15 posted on 08/13/2010 11:19:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (UniTea! It's not Rs vs Ds you dimwits. It's Cs vs Ls. Cut the crap & lets build for success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The 14th doesn’t allow for automatic citizenship. That SOB Brennan put a footnote in a ruling.


16 posted on 08/13/2010 11:21:52 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Exactly. The authors of the 14th Amendment stated that citizenship would not automatically be extended to illegal aliens. All that is required is a simple law clarifying that.


17 posted on 08/13/2010 11:22:09 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Neither does Alan Keys.


18 posted on 08/13/2010 11:24:33 AM PDT by SmartInsight (Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote. ~ G. J. Nathan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

>> I don’t either.

What is the point of the concession? Are you in agreement with McCain’s long standing position on immigration?


19 posted on 08/13/2010 11:28:00 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Yes, based on an author’s comments. That’s all.

Almost as brilliant as the justice that used European case law to buttress his arguments here.

European case law cannot be used to buttress a Constitutionality issue. At least not ours.


20 posted on 08/13/2010 11:28:06 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (UniTea! It's not Rs vs Ds you dimwits. It's Cs vs Ls. Cut the crap & lets build for success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson