Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WHAT on earth would they want to own DU for???
1 posted on 08/12/2010 3:55:07 PM PDT by Kieri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kieri

Is anyone going to challenge these thieves in court?


2 posted on 08/12/2010 3:57:33 PM PDT by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

For the same reason they are wanting to own Free Republic, too.

Extorted money.


3 posted on 08/12/2010 4:00:06 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri
Righthaven seems to be suing more sites every week (it's about to crack 100, if it hasn't already)

Righthaven management is now looking and saying "is there a site with any readership that we haven't sued yet? Why not? I want suits filed by morning!"

5 posted on 08/12/2010 4:02:03 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

Have they heard of SCO?


6 posted on 08/12/2010 4:04:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

It is a bunch of lawyers playing a can’t lose lottery. They throw basketfuls of darts at multiple targets and collect big for every one that hits a target while costs of threats or filings re miniscule in comparison. In the old days, before judges were men who had taken Critical Legal Studies in Law School these cases would have been disallowed and there would be no payoff. Someone would have to have a real law-based case to get a hearing. Now all the lawyers and judges are graduates of the Crit courses which teach them how to use the Law to destroy society-as-it-is and that it is right to do that. Everything is allowable and because cases are allowed into court in the first place juries believe that they are legitimate cases and treat them as such.


7 posted on 08/12/2010 4:06:04 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri
"In those cases, the site owners are almost certainly protected by the DMCA safe harbors (assuming they've set themselves up with the Copyright Office for DMCA safe harbor protections). That doesn't seem to be stopping Righthaven, though, which is making some fascinating (and blatantly wrong) legal claims."

Since they are doing this in a "lawyer mill" fashion, they are setting themselves up for some major "frivolous litigation" damages. Perhaps even disciplinary action. A "lawyer mill" generally has a team (usually non-lawyers) churning out form "cookie-cutter" lawsuits based on a common act. Here they seem to have a computer algorithm looking for any quotes from the Journal then if it finds one a lawsuit gets filed. The only thing the lawyer does in the initiation process is sign the pleading.

9 posted on 08/12/2010 4:22:28 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

This sounds like what the mother of Drew Brees was doing not long before she went off to the Rockies and committed suicide. She was shaking down restaurants and demanding they turn over their domain names and, basically, hoping they simply paid the litigant off and not realize she was just scamming them.

The way to get back is to countersue and INCLUDE every organization whose content is used by the Las Vegas Review Journal, as well as the Review Journal itself. Why, if FR, DU, etc. are to blame for what individual posters post then it should be concluded, by their logic, that Righthaven is suing on behalf of the AP, United Features Syndicate, etc.

At some point, someone is going to come back to the LVRJ and tell them to stop this nonsense and that’s where this will all end.


12 posted on 08/12/2010 4:34:13 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

You just posted a full text article. Better hope Righthaven doesn’t buy the rights to it...


14 posted on 08/12/2010 6:43:31 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

Is Righthaven a holding company? I did some search and all I can find is lawsuits by them. Do they have a website?


16 posted on 08/15/2010 12:36:31 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (Bunnies Are Worthy Of Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kieri

Is Righthaven a holding company? I did some search and all I can find is lawsuits by them. Do they have a website?


17 posted on 08/15/2010 12:36:36 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (Bunnies Are Worthy Of Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson