Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More About Tyler Collins, the Man Who Posed as a Rand Paul Fan, Complete With Tinfoil Hat
Slate ^ | August 11, 2010 | David Weigel

Posted on 08/11/2010 12:48:01 PM PDT by Second Amendment First

I just talked to Tyler Collins, who politely declined to comment as he adjusts to life as the subject of a multi-tier campaign of citizen journalism investigating his life as a Democratic activist. You know Collins. He was the guy who dressed up as a slack-jawed "Rand Paul fan," wearing a tinfoil hat and holding a sign that echoed/parodied conservative fears about illegal immigration.

Why is Collins lying low? Because he has a long picture and paper trail as a Democratic activist.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: collins; fraud; humblegunnerlies; ky2010; randpaul; teapartyfake; tinfoilhat; tylercollins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Lurker

Thanks for the prayers.


61 posted on 08/11/2010 2:26:48 PM PDT by Allegra (We are all humblegunner...and Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
In other words you LIED when you directly quoted the Pauls as saying “9-11 is an inside job.” Someone who makes up fake quotations is on the level of a Dan Rather and need not be taken seriously.

So, what is it you're sipping this evening? Mad Dog 20-20? Maybe some Boone's Farm?

62 posted on 08/11/2010 2:30:10 PM PDT by Allegra (We are all humblegunner...and Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

They are a grumpy lot. Mean spirited and liars.


63 posted on 08/11/2010 2:30:48 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

I know you have already indicated to me that you have no problem with the Marxist agenda for the abolition of family and the use of the big government Courts to redistribute money and rights to the left-wing from American businesses and that you are in favor of trying to manipulate the TEA parties in supporting candidates on this fiscally irresponsible position of governing.

Of course then it fits if you support the pervert Ron Paul and his son.


64 posted on 08/11/2010 2:30:54 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Mother Jones? Come on!

I'm agnostic about Rand and I'd really appreciate knowing if he's a loon like his deranged father or if he is his own man and a true conservative.

It requires a direct quote and not nonsense from Mother Jones, MSNBC or other centers of misinformation dedicated to pitting conservatives against each other long enough to elect more commies to Congress.

65 posted on 08/11/2010 2:34:27 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Mother Jones? Come on!

Best I could come up with on the fly.
I don't spend a lot of time chronicling Pauls(s) lunacy.

You're pretty advanced, surely you can dig stuff up yourself.

And I'm still staying away from your tent and your camp.

Look up, to the north.. see the small firelight on the ridge?

66 posted on 08/11/2010 2:40:00 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Great, now I’ll have to wait up all night. Please bring snacks.


67 posted on 08/11/2010 3:15:55 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Please bring snacks.

I ain't coming down there.

You're worse than Conan in his early years.

Send out for snacks. I've got responsibilities and can't risk capture.

Who'll feed the animals?

68 posted on 08/11/2010 3:22:22 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Your loss. Some men have actually died of regret.


69 posted on 08/11/2010 3:26:34 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Yeah.
Key word here is “died”.


70 posted on 08/11/2010 3:27:53 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Right, everyone who disagrees with you on the direction of the Tea Party is a closeted marxist big government supporter. We must all toe your line.

Welcome to reality.


71 posted on 08/11/2010 4:36:44 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Usually when you make an accusation, you need to dig up evidence to prove it, not the other way around.


72 posted on 08/11/2010 4:38:24 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

Do you know the difference between an assertion and an accusation?

I assert Ron & Rand Paul are anti-Military lunatics and “truthers”.

Deal with it. Prove otherwise.


73 posted on 08/11/2010 4:44:39 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Deb

And as we see, Pablo is very wily.


74 posted on 08/11/2010 4:51:03 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I know that when you say that somebody belongs to a certain group, the burden of proof is on you.

Otherwise, I could be here all day long asserting thins I heard about you, and you would have to disprove a negative, which is impossible.

Deal with it.


75 posted on 08/11/2010 4:52:28 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

You are the one that thinks having social Marxists join the TEA party is a good idea. It has nothing to do with ‘everyone who disagrees’ as you claim.

The social Marxist believes in the abolition of family thus empowering the government to put itself above family. This movement today involves using social issues such as gay marraige to redistribute wealth, power and rights in the Courts.

These are not values compatable with the TEA party no matter how much you want to insist that they are comaptible.

It also was not me at all we said that any TEA party must toe and line. I simply said that they would be hurting their movement to support social Marxists. It was you who insisted that they toe the line of being neutral to social Marxism. You insisted that over and over.

Your detachment from reality as to what it was that you even argued for is stunning.


76 posted on 08/11/2010 4:59:29 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Keep trying, Raider. You show potential.


77 posted on 08/11/2010 5:09:45 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Yeah, if you could ever find anything where I said that, you might have a point. But I didnt say that. You just cant read, and Im sorry for your condition.


78 posted on 08/11/2010 5:20:14 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

So, your response is a picture that you probably didnt even make. I take it you concede that you are wrong. You cant prove your point, all you can do is make jokes. You have nothing.


79 posted on 08/11/2010 5:21:47 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

I’ll just ask you then now.

Do you think that the TEA party must remain neutral in regards to the social Marxist stance on claiming that people must accept changing the defintion of marraige to include homsexual relationships or be taken to Court and punished?

I already know that you argued that they must before but I’ll ask you again.


80 posted on 08/11/2010 5:25:41 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson