You are the one that thinks having social Marxists join the TEA party is a good idea. It has nothing to do with ‘everyone who disagrees’ as you claim.
The social Marxist believes in the abolition of family thus empowering the government to put itself above family. This movement today involves using social issues such as gay marraige to redistribute wealth, power and rights in the Courts.
These are not values compatable with the TEA party no matter how much you want to insist that they are comaptible.
It also was not me at all we said that any TEA party must toe and line. I simply said that they would be hurting their movement to support social Marxists. It was you who insisted that they toe the line of being neutral to social Marxism. You insisted that over and over.
Your detachment from reality as to what it was that you even argued for is stunning.
Yeah, if you could ever find anything where I said that, you might have a point. But I didnt say that. You just cant read, and Im sorry for your condition.