Yeah, if you could ever find anything where I said that, you might have a point. But I didnt say that. You just cant read, and Im sorry for your condition.
I’ll just ask you then now.
Do you think that the TEA party must remain neutral in regards to the social Marxist stance on claiming that people must accept changing the defintion of marraige to include homsexual relationships or be taken to Court and punished?
I already know that you argued that they must before but I’ll ask you again.
Paul’s position on wanting to limit the scope of our Naitonal Security to it’s barest limits is well known. It is also known now that he wants to push his perverted morality on our troops and violate their rights by forcing them to bunk and shower with people who openly express their perversion for the same gender.
Of course though that is most probably your own stance as well. I am sure you would want the TEA party to be neutral to supporting Code Pink members in it’s ranks aas well and supporting Code Pink type candidates like Paul as well.