Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freddie Mac Asks Taxpayers for $1.8 Billion More After Huge Loss
MoneyNews.com ^ | August 9, 2010

Posted on 08/09/2010 5:34:50 PM PDT by La Lydia

Government-controlled mortgage buyer Freddie Mac is asking for $1.8 billion in additional federal aid after posting a larger loss in the second quarter. Freddie Mac said Monday it lost $6 billion, or $1.85 per share, in the April-to-June period. The company is required to pay a 10 percent annual dividend to the Treasury Department on money it has received from the government. That made up $1.3 billion of the company's second-quarter losses. The company lost $840 million, or 26 cents a share, in the same quarter last year.

The government rescued McLean, Va.-based Freddie Mac and sibling company Fannie Mae from the brink of failure nearly two years ago. The new request means they have needed $148.2 billion to stay afloat, about $63.1 billion of which is being used by Freddie Mac.

Freddie Mac is losing money from bad loans it backed, many of them before the housing market went bust. It had $118 billion in bad loans at the end of June, up from $103.4 billion at the end of last year. It owned more than 62,000 foreclosed properties in June, up from about 35,000 a year earlier.

Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have both lost tens of billions of dollars during the past two years and both are asking the government to prop them up. Last week, Fannie Mae requested $1.5 billion after posting a loss of $3.13 billion, or 55 cents per share, in the second quarter.

Still, the two companies are taking different approaches to their situations. Fannie Mae sounded optimistic about its future. Freddie Mac offered a more tempered view.

"We recognize that high unemployment and other factors still pose very real challenges for the housing market," CEO Charles Haldeman said in a statement. "With that in mind, we continue to focus on the quality of the new business we are adding to our book to be responsible stewards of taxpayer funds."...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: abuse; socialism; unmitigatedgall; waste
Two words: Franklin Raines
1 posted on 08/09/2010 5:34:53 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Let me get my checkbook.


2 posted on 08/09/2010 5:37:17 PM PDT by casuist (Audi alteram partem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Gee, I can’t find it now. But recently I read an article that described the Fed slowly using the GSEs (Fannie/Freddie) to dump the toxic assets on their balance sheets.
Anyone?


3 posted on 08/09/2010 5:41:32 PM PDT by griswold3 ('Regulation and law without enforcement is no law at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Isn’t it amazing how Fannie and Freddie were exempted from the commie’s new financial reform act?
It’s getting too late folks. WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 08/09/2010 5:44:11 PM PDT by taillightchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
This is no joke,, the wife and I are trying to buy a house financed by none other than freddi/fanny,, the perp living there can't make the payments OR the second morgage he took out to pay for his car...{there are holes in the walls, grass not cut for months, etc...

FANNIE/FREDDIE,(your tax dollars) will PAY him $1500 BUCKS,, to leave, even though he has not paid a house note in damn near a YEAR,,to "leave the keys" and move out, all this BEFORE they will consider our offer of 40% less than he paid for it!!!AND IT HAS NOT BEEN FORECLOSED ON YET!!!!!

keep your bible close and your rifle closer,,, we are lost!!

5 posted on 08/09/2010 6:04:16 PM PDT by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
"With that in mind, we continue to focus on the quality of the new business we are adding to our book to be responsible stewards of taxpayer funds."...

Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha! (BS^2)

6 posted on 08/09/2010 6:32:34 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

No more of my money should go to folks who bought houses they can’t pay for.

Or banks that made bad loans to folk who won’t or can’t play em back.


7 posted on 08/09/2010 7:37:10 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

“No more of my money...”

That’s your first mistake. You think it’s your money. The ‘progressives’ think differently.


8 posted on 08/09/2010 8:19:07 PM PDT by griswold3 ('Regulation and law without enforcement is no law at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Government wants $1.8 billion in additional federal bail out from the stupid tax payers...


9 posted on 08/09/2010 8:21:17 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
With that in mind, the government continues to focus on the quality of the new business we are adding to our book to be responsible stewards of taxpayer funds.

Gezzz...

10 posted on 08/09/2010 8:23:14 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

And that there is the utility and necessity of the right of secession. When the ruling factions be they the majority or merely an elite minority thinks they have unlimited right to our money and resources we must remind them that they are allowed to rule us only under a finite set of conditions.

If they cannot live within the confines of them conditions then we will seek to make it imposable for them to rule us.

The point of our union is not to service them but us.


11 posted on 08/10/2010 10:45:02 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

When the ruling factions be they the majority or merely an elite minority thinks they have unlimited right to our money and resources we must remind them that they are allowed to rule us only under a finite set of conditions.

If they cannot live within the confines of them conditions then we will seek to make it imposable for them to rule us.

Well said, my friend, well said.


12 posted on 08/11/2010 5:04:22 AM PDT by griswold3 ('Regulation and law without enforcement is no law at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson