Same-Sex Marriage Judge Finds That a Child Has Neither a Need Nor a Right to a Mother

CNSNews ^ | August 9, 2010 | Terence P. Jeffrey

[jazusamo]

(CNSNews.com) - U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who ruled last week that a voter-approved amendment to California’s constitution that limited marriage to the union of one man and one woman violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, based that ruling in part on his finding that a child does not need and has no right to a mother.
 
Nor, he found, does a child have a need or a right to a father.
 
“Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a female parent to be well-adjusted, and having both a male and a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child will be well-adjusted,” the judge wrote in finding of fact No. 71 in his opinion.
 
“The gender of a child’s parent is not a factor in a child’s adjustment,” the judge stated in finding of fact No. 70. “The sexual orientation of an individual does not determine whether that individual can be a good parent. Children raised by gay or lesbian parents are as likely as children raised by heterosexual parents to be healthy, successful and well-adjusted. The research supporting this conclusion is accepted beyond serious debate in the field of developmental psychology.”
 
Despite Walker’s claim that this “fact” is “beyond serious debate,” one of the sources he cited for it was a brochure published by the American Psychological Association (APA) that was entered into evidence in the case, which specifically stated twice: “Few studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.” Walker did not quote this part of the brochure in his opinion.
 
However, Walker did quote this same brochure as saying: “[S]ocial science has shown that the concerns often raised about children of lesbian and gay parents--concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes about gay people--are unfounded.”
 
This quote comes from a side-bar box on page five of the six-page APA brochure. The box purports to answer the “most common questions” about homosexual parents, posing four such questions and giving the APA’s answer to them.
 
The first is: “Do children of lesbian and gay parents have more problems with sexual identity than do children of heterosexual parents?”
 
The full answer in the brochure is as follows: “For instance, do these children develop problems in gender identity and/or in gender role behavior? The answer from research is clear: sexual and gender identities (including gender identity, gender-role behavior, and sexual orientation) develop in much the same way among children of lesbian mothers as they do among children of heterosexual parents. Few studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.”
 
The brochure does not explain why the APA concludes that the “answer from research is clear” that children of homosexual parents do not have more problems with sexual identity than children with mothers and fathers when in fact, as the brochure itself states, “[f]ew studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.” Nor does Judge Walker explain how his finding of “fact” that the gender of parents does not matter to children is “beyond serious debate” when in fact his own source stipulates that “[f]ew studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.”
 
The second question answered in the brochure is:  “Do children raised by lesbian or gay parents have problems in personal development in areas other than sexual identity?”
 
The entirety of the answer provided in the brochure states:  “For example, are the children of lesbian or gay parents more vulnerable to mental breakdown, do they have more behavior problems, or are they less psychologically healthy than other children? Again, studies of personality, self-concept, and behavior problems show few differences between children of lesbian mothers and children of heterosexual parents. Few studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.”

Judge Walker does not quote this part of the brochure in his finding that the gender of parents does not matter, nor does he explain how his finding can be “beyond serious debate” when in fact the very evidence he uses to establish this point states that “[f]ew studies are available regarding gay fathers.”
 
To further his case that the well-being of children is no bar to declaring same-sex marriage a right protected  by the Fourteenth Amendment, Judge Walker makes a finding of fact that the state of California already legally recognizes that the gender of parents is irrelevant.  As Walker reports it, California laws goes so far as to “encourage” homosexuals to acquire children whether through adoption, foster care, or artificially conceiving a child and, presumably, in the case of a male-male couple, securing a female to gestate the child until the male-male couple can take custody of it.
 
“California law permits and encourages gays and lesbians to become parents through adoption, foster parenting or assistive reproductive technology,” writes Walker in finding of fact No. 49. “Approximately 18 percent of same-sex couples in California are raising children.”
 
To support this finding, Walker notes that California’s attorney general, who is Jerry Brown, “admits that the laws of California recognize no relationship between a person’s sexual orientation and his or her ability to raise children.”
 
“Attorney General admits,” writes Walker, “that California law protects the right of gay men and lesbians in same-sex relationships to be foster parents and to adopt children by forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.”

Walker’s ruling declaring same-sex marriage protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, if upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, would have ramifications far beyond California, requiring states across the union to recognize same-sex marriages while wiping out any legal protection a child might have from being handed over by state governments to same-sex couples either through adoption or foster parenthood.
 
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied by Walker would require states to grant a marriage license to same-sex couples and would-be parents, while implicitly annihilating the notion that each American child has an equal right to a mother and a father.
 
A child put out for adoption or foster parenting by the state, or a child conceived through technological means and gestated in a hired womb, would have no right not to be assigned to a homosexual couple who would act as his or her father and father or mother and mother.

[jazusamo]

It is not enough to describe this guy as an idiot.

You nailed it, Gene. When he got this case he must have thought he'd won the lottery.

[ken5050]

Question for the group..when the GOP wns the House this November, shoudl they introduce a Bill to impeach Walker? I’m not a lawyer..have no pretensions as a constitutional scholar..but, under the Federalist writings, it would seem that Walker’s decision..which flies in the face of the will of the people...merits impeachment..what say you all..

[jazusamo]

This is what it’s all about. Getting access to children.

Couldn't agree more, NAMBLA must worship the ground this turkey walks on.

[Morpheus2009]

What the....?

I had a hard time thinking this was for real for a second. A mother is an important member of a family. Even when there is no father, for whatever reason, the mother is important to a child’s well-being.

If someone thinks a man can really replace the role of a mother to a child, he needs to get his head out of his you know where.

[longtermmemmory]

How about we make it very simple. “Will you vote yes on the federal marriage amendment”. NO BS. no “let the court system work”

Will you do your job mr/mrs/miss candidate and vote FOR the Federal Marriage Amendment.

[jazusamo]

Like you I’m no legal eagle but this sure merits impeachment in my view.

[greatplains]

He probably also believes that single parent Dads are equal in all ways to two parent families.

Both a Mom and a Dad are the most desirable situation.

[tbpiper]

“Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a female parent to be well-adjusted, and having both a male and a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child will be well-adjusted,” the judge wrote in finding of fact No. 71 in his opinion.

There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death. Proverbs 14:12

1 Jesus said to his disciples: "Things that cause people to sin are bound to come, but woe to that person through whom they come. 2It would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around his neck than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin

[Thank You Rush]

What happens when the marrying couple already have children from previous marriages - from the days before they discovered they were BORN homosexuals? Do they now become LEGAL stepchildren/stepparents?

[ardara]

I also think we should elect Federal Judges and have term-limits on them.

[Morpheus2009]

Gender is something people are.

Couldn’t have said it better.

The irony is that 99.9% of these left liberals are shooting even themselves in the foot, but are far to ignorant to even see it coming...

People have been mentioning for a fact that America and Europe have been depopulating and calling in immigration to fill the gaps. Europe is being outpopulated, especially in the younger age groups, by Muslims. Polls show 35-45% desire to impose Sharia on the nation. Sharia should make a liberal freeze in terror. Sharia is where they stone gays and lesbians to death as a public event. Liberals also seem blind to the fact that Latino populations are overtaking both black and white populations in the U.S. as well. All in all, they fail to see the invasion and eventual overthrow of their culture by a radical right agenda, or they just run into their rooms and deny that it’s happening.

[Morpheus2009]

It’s just a short matter of time at this point.

Before a new feudal or mideval age starts run by the takeover of Muslims in Europe and illegal immigrants in the U.S.

[Morpheus2009]

Yes they do. There have been at least two cases I have known in which a supposedly heterosexual married man who fathered kids left his family to come out of the closet and get involved with a gay lover.

[bunkerhill7]

He is the Mouther of All Whores

[chris37]

The forces of Evil are on the march, and there are a great many of them.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

“the homosexual agenda on the backs of the feminist movement”

the problem with such “movements” is they quickly get domainated by people with a broader agenda. In our agenda, those are leftists.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

Or rather,

...the problem with such “movements” is they quickly get dominated by people with a broader agenda. In our age, those are leftists.

[Venturer]

What does Walker know about children and adjustments. He is a peter-puffer himself. He needs a little adjustment and probably gets it from behind with a large adjustment tool.

[Marathoner]

I really, really hope that if the Repubs do in fact reclaim the House in November that one of their first acts would be to introduce impeachment proceedings against this idiot judge. Even if the Senate didn’t convict, it would at least send a message to these black robe tyrants that there is at least some accountability for their decisions.

[brytlea]

I’m not sure why anyone doesn’t get that, there is so much evidence since we have experimented on a couple of generations now. But, these people’s agenda doesn’t care about harm to individuals.