Posted on 08/09/2010 9:44:11 AM PDT by jazusamo
The judge discounts the natural bond between parents and child. IT IS REAL!!! In the end, it is “All About Family”.
Amazing that for all the work the idiot Judge took to determine his desired perverted and socially destructive outcome by means of ‘findings of fact’ that not one one-hundredth of that effort as been put into finding, in a court, under oath and cross examination and the ability to have opposing experts heard, whether Obama is eligible to hold his office.
Absolute bullsh!t.
A child needs both a mother and a father.
We are lost as a species.
It’s just a short matter of time at this point.
He probably also believes that single parent Moms are equal in all ways to two parent families.
This judge, and I use the term judge loosely, is an agenda driven idiot. You’re correct, the family bond is real!
LOL!! No doubt this guy also believes in global warming.
I wonder who raised him?
Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a female parent to be well-adjusted, and having both a male and a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child will be well-adjusted,
Complete and utter BS.
The impeachment process is a two-step procedure. The House of Representatives must first pass by a simple majority articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached". Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. For the impeachment of any other official, the Constitution is silent on who shall preside, suggesting that this role falls to the Senate's usual presiding officer. This may include the impeachment of the vice president, although legal theories suggest that allowing a defendant to be the judge in his own case would be a blatant conflict of interest. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment (of anyone besides the President), the duties would fall to the President pro tempore of the Senate.
To convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required. Conviction automatically removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction by the Senate does not bar criminal prosecution. Even after an accused has left office, it is possible to impeach to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of his prior office (such as a pension). If there is no charge for which a two-thirds majority of the senators present vote "guilty", the defendant is acquitted and no punishment is imposed.
Of course, we can only expect this kind of inept understanding of our republic, from most liberals. They despise America and the ballot and personal responsibility, yet they celebrate tyranny and authoritarianism. Why? Because they are elitists.
The irony is that 99.9% of these left liberals are shooting even themselves in the foot, but are far too ignorant to even see it coming, even though it is their own finger on the trigger.
They are cutting off their noses to spite their face. But, it will always be someone else’s fault when they look in the mirror and see the ugliness.
Agree with you, but our constitution is based on Natural Law Theory. This judge violates the entire theory of Natural Law which is based on logic, reason and science.
He should be disbarred immediately because he is so ideological driven he cannot see reason and logic which all our laws are based on, and our laws have to be based on reason and logic to be just.
The judge will justify his decision based on the fact that the Nazis did the same thing — breed as many Arian-pure children for future SS troopers and separate them from their mothers at birth. Parental influence was not desirable.
Children should be educated by the State and not by the parents in this brave new world. What’s the matter with U?
Didn’t I see where this Walker was gay? And he pretends to know how to create a “well adjusted child”? He’s not a psychologist, he just plays one in the courtroom.
Yes, I read that he’s gay and though supposedly not an activist he’s never tried to conceal it.
>> “having both a male and a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child will be well-adjusted”
Especially when the male is a closet homosexual... /s
It is not enough to describe this guy as an idiot.
This is what it’s all about. Getting access to children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.