Replies

Isn't it wonderful how much race is now brought into virtually every discussion about politics?

-------------------------------

Hey Juan,

So.... let's have a honest conversation. Let me start.

Obama hates old white people because most are smarter than younger white people.

It's a culture war and it goes on all the time. Music, films, clothes, language, etc. The basic premise is that no universally applicable form of law exists, and that the American legal system, having evolved from British common law, is a 'white' structure, racist to the core, that cannot be fairly applied to blacks.

This is the norm for large cities today. Most want entitlement, that's their idea of justice and the result of having been schooled in affirmative action ideology and the 'we wuz slaves' mentality that they will never abandon.

The working guy who gets the hell out of the city at 5pm knows what this mentality has done to the cities over the last 25 or so years. Not a pretty picture. I don't know how city cops deal with it.

They call black conservatives 'sellouts,' traitors and 'Uncle Toms'. That's because the label 'racist' is reserved for whites. All whites. If you are white, you are 'racist'. It is simply their way of saying 'the enemy' in this barely disguised war against whites. Don't act surprised at that language!

The term 'racist' is meant to silence whites and is really about wealth and power. The power to confiscate wealth. This goes far, far beyond paying a bit more in taxes. The left wants total control.

I think we know the ideology that the president and Mr. Holder follow. The media try to look the other way and give them a pass on it. If you criticize Obama, you're 'racist.' I don't care if Obama is green and purple -- he's still a socialist. Don't call me 'racist,' call me 'anti-socalist.'

If you oppose quotas, you're 'racist.' If you say that there are differences among groups, you're 'racist.' If you want English to be the national language, you're 'racist.' The word 'racist' has become meaningless, used only to stifle conservatives from speaking certain truths. If someone calls you a racist, they are race-baiting. They are being racist. Call them on it.

Tell them you are against Progressive Democrats, who continually play the race card, deliberately, with nothing but political gain in mind. Tell them you are against Anti-American Americans. But by speaking certain truths you are not going to change anything in the mind of a fool liberal, or the mainstream media or the NAACP.

They are enemies. And this enemy is not interested in listening to logic; they're interested in spouting their propaganda. Again, the left wants total control.

From Karl Marx to today, the left has always hated people on the right. The left's utopian vision is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives.

Those who believe in individuals taking care of themselves, not the state.

Conservative are the enemy.

It's all about twisting the language. Democrats lie, that's what they do. Their propaganda is invalid and they know it's invalid -- that's the nature of propaganda. They won't yield to facts or reason. Leftists lie through their teeth, and then, when you respond with facts they pout and say: 'You're mean! You're intolerant! What happened to civility?'

So when Joe Wilson shouts 'You lie!' at Barack Obama, we can and should respond: 'Representative Wilson was wrong. Obama lies a lot.'

Marxism does not elevate the status of the poor; it only adds more to the ranks of the poor.

WAKE UP AMERICA!

It is hard to compete with a party that gives away the treasury.

The Weekly Standard 10-19-2009
Decline is a Choice

"he's still a socialist"

I thought Obama was socialist during the election process, then some of his actions reminded me more of fascism, so I made an effort to research the issue, especially looking more closely at fascism. My clear conclusion is that Obama's ideology is fascism. [With "Nationalism" having led Mussolini to "total power" (totalitarianism) in Italy, and "the economy" having boosted Obama to power.] The "corporate" element of fascism also reminds one of Ron Paul's (I'm not currently a Paul supporter.) description of the present situation.

Some interesting info. I came across (from sources published in the 1990's (pre-Obama)*:
- Mussolini was originally a socialist.
- On 12 Jan 1923, Mussolini announced an intention to form a "Milizia Volontaria per la sicurezza nazionale" (MSVN, volunteer militia for national security, "a paramilitary force which would rival the national army".
- In 1933, many Italian commentators depicted FDR as a Fascist in spite of himself, "driven towards an interventionist and corporate state as the only rational exit from the Depression".*
- In 1922, the fascism government of Italy began funding the press that suppored them, and soon made it compulsory that every journalism be a registered fascist.
- Business was allowed under fascism, but there was intervention in economic production "when private initiative is lacking or insufficient and when political interests of the state are directly involved." In October of 1925 the fascist "Palazzo Vidoni Pact" created a 'corporate system' under which business and labor would bend to fascist authority. And, the state 'pledged' to arbitrate any disputes.
- In Jan 1933 the Fascists created the Institute for the Reconstruction of Industry {IRI] to bail out banks during the Depression. "Through it's provision of credit, the IRI was soon appointing managers over a wide range of the national economy. The companies included car manufacturer Alfa Romeo."
- A prominent fascist defined the essence of corportarism as being that "the state recognizes and safeguards individual property rights so long as they are not being exercised in a way which contravenes the prevailing collective interest."

Having spent many hours researching fascism, it appears to me that Obama is clearly laying the groundwork for an American Fascism which would be fully implemented during the coming economic crisis.

The parallel between the Italian fascist call for, 'a national security force equal to the army' and the video of Obama calling for a national security force equal to the military, leads me to suspect that Obama has actually read the fascist documentation.

An excellent source reading (and the source of my notes for the quotes above) is: "Mussolini's Italy" by R.J.B. Bosworth (written in the 90's). It is extremely detailed and sourced. There isn't room in a post to bring forth all the parallels between Mussolini's fascism and the current regime.