Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Death of the Dollar
THE AMERICAN THINKER ^ | August 06, 2010 | Vasko Kohlmayer

Posted on 08/05/2010 11:35:11 PM PDT by onyx

Nothing can save our financial system in the long run.  It is doomed to collapse. This is inevitable, because our government controls and manages its very foundation -- the dollar.

The federal government began its takeover of the dollar in 1913 when it established the Federal Reserve Banking System. Prior to that the dollar was a real store of value. In the period from 1783 to 1913 there was a long period of currency stability with virtually no inflation. If you saved one dollar in 1800, your great grandchild could buy roughly the same amount of goods with the same dollar one century later.

In 1913 five dollars could get you the following:

15 pounds of potatoes, 10 pounds of flour, 5 pounds of sugar, 5 pounds of chuck roast, 3 pounds of round steak, 3 pounds of rice, 2 pounds each of cheese and bacon, and a pound each of butter and coffee... two loaves of bread, 4 quarts of milk and a dozen eggs.

In 2010 five dollars barely gets you two pounds of cut chicken meat.

Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 the dollar has shed more than 90 percent of its value. The loss of value has been especially pronounced since 1971 when Richard Nixon took the dollar off the last vestiges of the gold standard. On that date the dollar became a pure fiat currency grounded in nothing but the whims of politicians and technocrats. The consequences have been disastrous. One thousand of 1971 dollars would only buy $185 worth of goods today. This represents a loss of some 80 percent in purchasing power.

The dollar has already entered its terminal phase. The word "doom" is written across it for anyone with the eyes to see. Sad to say, there is no way to reverse its downward slide. With more than $13 trillion in public debt and some $100 trillion in unfunded mandates our federal government has assumed far more obligations that it can ever make good on. Worse still, these figures are growing larger every year.

To put it bluntly, our federal government is flat-out bankrupt. Currency disintegration is always the unavoidable result of government bankruptcy. The dollar -- which has been weakening for many decades -- will at some point go into a sudden death spin.

The only question is when. It may happen six months from now or six years from now. The timeframe is impossible to predict, but we can now for certain that happen it will. No one -- not even the federal government -- can escape the numbers. And the numbers are hideous. One hundred trillion plus is a killer.

Under normal circumstances the dollar would have collapsed already given how impossibly indebted our government is. Some people are puzzled by its continued survival. They say this is just another sign that we live in a crazy world. But there is nothing crazy about it. The dollar is still alive, because there is no ready alternative.

Doomed though it may be in the long term, big time holders of US dollars keep desperately hanging on, because they have nowhere else to go. Where else could China invest its nearly one trillion dollar reserves? There is no easy option. So China keeps propping America's federal debt by purchasing Treasury notes and thus keeping the dollar afloat. It is a bad deal for China and a fortuitous one for the US, at least for the time being. But things cannot go on like this forever. Eventually something will give in and the whole gargantuan house of debt will come crashing down. When that happens things will get ugly.

Some people may say this situation has been brought about by reckless fiscal and budgetary policies rather than by the government's management of the currency. But the ability of government to run deficits is directly tied to its power to manage money.

It is very difficult for politicians to run large deficits if the currency is anchored in something intrinsically real and valuable, let's say gold. This is because when they post large budget shortfalls under a gold standard, people naturally ask them: "Where in the world are you going to get all the gold to pay for all this spending." And since politicians do not know how to make gold, they are forced to admit: "We are going to get it from you, the people, of course. Where else could it come from?"

As you can imagine, such answers do not usually go well with the voting public. The restrictive quality that real money exerts on the profligacy of politicians is often referred as "the golden handcuffs."

As it is now, most people do not think that they will have to pay for the spending incurred by their representatives in Congress. They think that deficits are something that does not concern them directly. They somehow assume the if the government needs more money it can simply issue more bonds. But this way of living is unsustainable and sooner or later the inflow from abroad will stop. Then we will all pay for our government's extravagance by the disintegration of the currency.

Traumatic as it may be, we should not be surprised by this. It has to end this way. This result became ineluctable the moment the American people gave government control over their money. Let's hope that we will learn from our mistakes. Let's hope that when the present monetary regime finally unwinds, we will have the wisdom to lay a more solid foundation for our money than the whims of politicians.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dollar; gold; government; obama; palin; silver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: onyx

I honestly don’t understand what to do or think.

**********

One of those times we hold the same position.


21 posted on 08/06/2010 12:08:19 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die. - Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Southack

“Don’t believe your own lying eyes.”

I wasn’t born yesterday, kiddo.


22 posted on 08/06/2010 12:08:54 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Falling values slam Chicago apartment owners
23 posted on 08/06/2010 12:10:43 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Another case of overheating during the Bush years. Chicago was considered a glamor spot. Next!


24 posted on 08/06/2010 12:11:49 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Face it buddy, no hard feelings, but more dollars out there in the streets mean they are going to be worth less, not more. Perhaps you consider that artificial, but nobody can deny that the Bummer has put them out there. Who’s living large? Ask the unions.


25 posted on 08/06/2010 12:15:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Your mind is closed. Sad. You’ll fail to see what is happening all around you.

That link wasn’t about Chicago in Bush years...had you actually read it, it was citing vacancy rates above 21% for the 2nd Qtr of this year for Chicago suburbs.

That’s more than one out of every 5 buildings vacant.

Only a court jester would pretend that prices are going up when every 5th building is vacant.


26 posted on 08/06/2010 12:16:38 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"Face it buddy, no hard feelings, but more dollars out there in the streets mean they are going to be worth less, not more."

Incorrect. Cash Dollars are trivial. There is just $800 Billion in U.S. cash money.

The rest is credit.

And there is 50% less credit today than in 2006.

27 posted on 08/06/2010 12:18:22 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Southack

You have a local cooling which was due to past overcapacity.


28 posted on 08/06/2010 12:18:24 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
What you call "local cooling" is deflation. Lower prices today than in the past.

Not higher prices.

Not inflation.

The opposite: deflation.

29 posted on 08/06/2010 12:20:02 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Southack

A dollar that can (and likely will) be readily got at and spent is out there on the streets. Bummer has pumped them out there through his favorite children, the unions and public servants. Without that, yes there would be a screeching deflation.


30 posted on 08/06/2010 12:20:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Southack

This is like saying the pot on the stove cooling counts the same as the climate cooling. Bah, humbug!


31 posted on 08/06/2010 12:21:38 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Debt is deflationary.

Debt is cumulative.

32 posted on 08/06/2010 12:21:46 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Southack

And if you’re so big that nobody cares about servicing the debt (at least now) the wallop is very much delayed.


33 posted on 08/06/2010 12:23:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It was delayed. Now it’s here.


34 posted on 08/06/2010 12:24:25 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Southack

How has worries about servicing the debt sucked down prices? That won’t happen until someone responsible takes the helm. Until then, the churning of fiat money from the presses merrily goes on.


35 posted on 08/06/2010 12:26:25 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

You’re backwards. Prices for U.S. bonds have gone through the roof, driving down bond yields.

In turn, bond yields have driven down mortgage rates to record lows.

Deflation.


36 posted on 08/06/2010 12:27:59 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I have some honest questions:

1. Is enough gold avaiable in the world to back the total amount of currency now in circulation?

2. Wouldn’t going to a gold standard produce deflation?

3. What would happen to the $10T national debt under a gold standard?


37 posted on 08/06/2010 12:30:32 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

And in mirror image, stocks are straining like they want to hit the sky again. Net effect: cancellation.


38 posted on 08/06/2010 12:31:05 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Nope. Stocks are 35% below their 2006 peak.

Deflation.


39 posted on 08/06/2010 12:32:11 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Again, a local overheating. Bummer has given his Rats lots of dollars and guess where they went. If you didn’t know that stocks took a horrible dive in 2008 (and this was before the Bummer debt) you could be pardoned for considering this anemic.


40 posted on 08/06/2010 12:34:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson