Skip to comments.
The Death of the Dollar
THE AMERICAN THINKER ^
| August 06, 2010
| Vasko Kohlmayer
Posted on 08/05/2010 11:35:11 PM PDT by onyx
Nothing can save our financial system in the long run. It is doomed to collapse. This is inevitable, because our government controls and manages its very foundation -- the dollar.
The federal government began its takeover of the dollar in 1913 when it established the Federal Reserve Banking System. Prior to that the dollar was a real store of value. In the period from 1783 to 1913 there was a long period of currency stability with virtually no inflation. If you saved one dollar in 1800, your great grandchild could buy roughly the same amount of goods with the same dollar one century later.
In 1913 five dollars could get you the
following:
15 pounds of potatoes, 10 pounds of flour, 5 pounds of sugar, 5 pounds of chuck roast, 3 pounds of round steak, 3 pounds of rice, 2 pounds each of cheese and bacon, and a pound each of butter and coffee... two loaves of bread, 4 quarts of milk and a dozen eggs.
In 2010 five dollars barely
gets you two pounds of cut chicken meat.
Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 the dollar has shed more than 90 percent of its value. The loss of value has been especially pronounced since 1971 when Richard Nixon took the dollar off the last vestiges of the gold standard. On that date the dollar became a pure fiat currency grounded in nothing but the whims of politicians and technocrats. The consequences have been disastrous. One thousand of 1971 dollars would only
buy $185 worth of goods today. This represents a loss of some 80 percent in purchasing power.
The dollar has already entered its terminal phase. The word "doom" is written across it for anyone with the eyes to see. Sad to say, there is no way to reverse its downward slide. With more than $13 trillion in public debt and some $100 trillion in unfunded mandates our federal government has
assumed far more obligations that it can ever make good on. Worse still, these figures are growing larger every year.
To put it bluntly, our federal government is flat-out bankrupt. Currency disintegration is always the unavoidable result of government bankruptcy. The dollar -- which has been weakening for many decades -- will at some point go into a sudden death spin.
The only question is when. It may happen six months from now or six years from now. The timeframe is impossible to predict, but we can now for certain that happen it will. No one -- not even the federal government -- can escape the numbers. And the numbers are hideous. One hundred trillion plus is a killer.
Under normal circumstances the dollar would have collapsed already given how impossibly indebted our government is. Some people are puzzled by its continued survival. They say this is just another sign that we live in a crazy world. But there is nothing crazy about it. The dollar is still alive, because there is no ready alternative.
Doomed though it may be in the long term, big time holders of US dollars keep desperately hanging on, because they have nowhere else to go. Where else could China invest its nearly one trillion dollar reserves? There is no easy option. So China keeps propping America's federal debt by purchasing Treasury notes and thus keeping the dollar afloat. It is a bad deal for China and a fortuitous one for the US, at least for the time being. But things cannot go on like this forever. Eventually something will give in and the whole gargantuan house of debt will come crashing down. When that happens things will get ugly.
Some people may say this situation has been brought about by reckless fiscal and budgetary policies rather than by the government's management of the currency. But the ability of government to run deficits is directly tied to its power to manage money.
It is very difficult for politicians to run large deficits if the currency is anchored in something intrinsically real and valuable, let's say gold. This is because when they post large budget shortfalls under a gold standard, people naturally ask them: "Where in the world are you going to get all the gold to pay for all this spending." And since politicians do not know how to make gold, they are forced to admit: "We are going to get it from you, the people, of course. Where else could it come from?"
As you can imagine, such answers do not usually go well with the voting public. The restrictive quality that real money exerts on the profligacy of politicians is often referred as "the golden handcuffs."
As it is now, most people do not think that they will have to pay for the spending incurred by their representatives in Congress. They think that deficits are something that does not concern them directly. They somehow assume the if the government needs more money it can simply issue more bonds. But this way of living is unsustainable and sooner or later the inflow from abroad will stop. Then we will all pay for our government's extravagance by the disintegration of the currency.
Traumatic as it may be, we should not be surprised by this. It has to end this way. This result became ineluctable the moment the American people gave government control over their money. Let's hope that we will learn from our mistakes. Let's hope that when the present monetary regime finally unwinds, we will have the wisdom to lay a more solid foundation for our money than the whims of politicians.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dollar; gold; government; obama; palin; silver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
1
posted on
08/05/2010 11:35:12 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: onyx
Nope. Not inflation (a devaluation of the Dollar). The opposite: deflation.
Falling salaries. Falling employment (fewer jobs). Falling home prices.
Deflation.
2
posted on
08/05/2010 11:37:47 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
I honestly don’t understand what to do or think.
3
posted on
08/05/2010 11:41:30 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: onyx
Japan has had deflation since 1989. 21 straight years of outborrowing and out-spending the U.S.
Why does so much spending not lead to inflation?
Debt.
Debt is deflationary.
Moreover, debt is cummulative.
In contrast, spending is temporary. Yes, spending can give an economy short-term inflation...unless a nation has accumulated so much debt that is dragging the economy down.
Happened to Japan in 1989, and is still going on today.
Happened to the U.S. in 1893 and 1929, too.
We’ve seen all of this before.
It’s not the 1970s (an inflationary period).
It’s the opposite: falling home prices and falling salaries: deflation.
Debt is deflationary.
4
posted on
08/05/2010 11:45:28 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: onyx
” ... The federal government began its takeover of the dollar in 1913 when it established the Federal Reserve Banking System. ... “
Quite the opposite is true. The Constitution mandates that the Federal Government is responsible for maintaining the USA Dollar.
The Federal Reserve is a Private bank, and Congress abrogated it's responsibilities by establishing the Federal Reserve as a central bank, purveying interest bearing, debt based currency.
This was an act of Treason, and it has been perpetrated by treasonous politicians ever since. Some who have opposed it have been assassinated!
And That's The Truth.
5
posted on
08/05/2010 11:46:27 PM PDT
by
J Edgar
To: onyx
To: Southack
I sure haven’t seen a lot of that (understatement of year). Deflation means a dollar kept as cash will be worth more goods in the future, not less. Au contraire, it is surprising that prices haven’t gone up more than they have with all the funny money that the Bummer and the Ratgress have supposedly stimulused into the economy. The saving grace may be that banks that get their hands on these newly printed, borrowed dollars are socking them away like they’re going out of style, and so they sit in vaults instead of running around the economy driving prices up madly a la Zimbabwe.
7
posted on
08/05/2010 11:52:59 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: onyx
Where does one put their dollars at now, especially the money tied up in a 401k, that is expected to finance you through retirement? What investments are safe, that will keep up with the rate of inflation?
8
posted on
08/05/2010 11:54:39 PM PDT
by
rawhide
To: HiTech RedNeck
We are following Japan’s path since 1989, not Zimbabwe.
9
posted on
08/05/2010 11:54:49 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
So, a dollar buys more house, but it buys less bread. Which type of business occupies the average American more? I don’t think it’s the house!
10
posted on
08/05/2010 11:56:04 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck; Southack
That’s my thinking and observances too. What to do and what to hold? Dollars? Gold?
11
posted on
08/05/2010 11:56:22 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: Southack
All I can say is show me the bundle of goods that is getting cheaper. Houses are a specific bubble that burst. There is no bursting bread bubble.
12
posted on
08/05/2010 11:57:44 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: rawhide
Exactly. Real estate? Certainly not in a deflationary market. Precious metals? Wicked times.
13
posted on
08/05/2010 11:57:54 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Your major financial transactions in life are:
1. House
2. Salary
3. Stocks
All are lower now than in 2006 (DOW 14,000!).
Bread and milk prices are trivial. Major personal financials are tracking Japan down.
Fewer jobs. Slower speed of money.
Deflation.
Less credit availability.
Deflation.
14
posted on
08/05/2010 11:58:44 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
If you bought a house, your life probably is dominated by the mortgage. But if you didn’t? Are rents going down? If it weren’t for the cooling effect of cheaper houses and scarcer jobs, bread would be frightening. You think bread is trivial? Try to live without it.
15
posted on
08/06/2010 12:03:05 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
"All I can say is show me the bundle of goods that is getting cheaper. Houses are a specific bubble that burst. There is no bursting bread bubble." Incorrect.
Grocery Prices Now Falling
16
posted on
08/06/2010 12:03:05 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
Somebody phone the news to my community retailers, please.
17
posted on
08/06/2010 12:04:02 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
18
posted on
08/06/2010 12:06:00 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
... IN LOS ANGELES.
We always knew California was overheated. Next!
19
posted on
08/06/2010 12:07:25 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
"Somebody phone the news to my community retailers, please." People on a fixed income, as well as people who are under-employed (or who don't shop), have a psychological reaction to shopping that causes them to think that everything is over-priced.
That's why the blond TV bimbo prattles on about the price of milk...even as deflation ravages her local economy.
20
posted on
08/06/2010 12:08:10 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson