Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disoriented Judge
IBD Editorials ^ | August 5, 2010 | Investors Business, Daily staff

Posted on 08/05/2010 5:29:24 PM PDT by Kaslin

Journalism: Funny how practically no one knew that Judge Vaughn Walker was openly homosexual before his seismic ruling Wednesday. Why was such an obvious predisposition worth so little media attention?

All federal judges must swear they "will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me ... so help me God." But can a judge given the opportunity to knock down a law that declared homosexual marriages invalid be impartial when he himself is openly homosexual?

That question should have been part of the public discourse over the high-profile trial in U.S. District Court in San Francisco regarding California's Proposition 8, the California Marriage Protection Act, enshrined in the state constitution by a 2008 ballot initiative. But it was not part of the debate.

It wasn't that Judge Walker's orientation wasn't known. "The biggest open secret in the landmark trial over same-sex marriage being heard in San Francisco is that the federal judge who will decide the case, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, is himself gay," the San Francisco Chronicle noted back in February.

It was just treated as the issue that dare not speak its name.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: bglobemanipulation; bishopromney; bostonglobe4marshall; carpetbaggerromney; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; judge; judges; novote4you; romney; romneyfascism; romneymarriage; romneyvsclerks; romneyvsconstitution; vaughnwalker; walker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/05/2010 5:29:26 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That should negate his decision. He ruled with prejudice. In fact, he should be disbarred for violating his oath of office.


2 posted on 08/05/2010 5:31:25 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

I would have expected this (conflict of interest alleged and motion to recuse made) to be brought up in opening motions so that it could come up in an appeal. If a motion or objection wasn’t made, it’s tougher to get an appellate court to bring up the matter.


3 posted on 08/05/2010 5:34:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Only a statist would believe an inspection of the applicants genitalia was a condition precedent to being issued a license to marry.
4 posted on 08/05/2010 5:35:37 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I LOL'd when I heard ABC News add to their report that Walker was first nominated by Ronald Reagan.

They bothered to look that 25 year old factoid up but somehow missed his open homosexuality.

5 posted on 08/05/2010 5:36:26 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But can a judge given the opportunity to knock down a law that declared homosexual marriages invalid be impartial when he himself is openly homosexual?

The same could be said for a heterosexual judge.

Neil Boortz had a good analysis of this today based on the Rule of Law.
6 posted on 08/05/2010 5:36:54 PM PDT by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He should have recused himself.


7 posted on 08/05/2010 5:39:13 PM PDT by I still care (I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

Nobody asks for that, but in sane countries they do ask that one party vouches for being male and the other party vouches for being female.


8 posted on 08/05/2010 5:39:56 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

HE was appointed by Bush elder ... I’m sure he knew of Walker’s faggotry and bizarre legal ideology.


9 posted on 08/05/2010 5:42:11 PM PDT by eleni121 (But now, he that has a moneybag take it; without a sword let him sell his garment, and buy one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Day in history August 4, 1944

1944 - Nazi police discovered Anne Frank and her family, hiding in secret quarters above her father’s factory in Amsterdam, Holland. Miss Frank was 13 years old and had kept a diary of her feelings, thoughts and fears during the two years of hiding from the Nazis. Anne and her sister were taken to a concentration camp following the arrest. Anne Frank died at Bergen-Belsen. Her diary was found later and has since been translated into 30 different languages, adapted as a dramatic play and a Hollywood film. Her diary is a symbol of the strength of the human spirit. She wrote: “I keep on trying to find a way of becoming what I would like to be and what I could be, if there weren’t any other people living in the world.”


10 posted on 08/05/2010 5:43:59 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
HE was appointed by Bush elder ... I’m sure he knew of Walker’s faggotry and bizarre legal ideology.

You mean the same guy who appointed David Souter?

11 posted on 08/05/2010 5:45:55 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Politicians exist to break windows so they may spend other people's money to fix them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
He was appointed after Bush the Elder re-nominated him.

The democrats screamed bloody murder when Reagan nominated him, and he withdrew. Ironic.

12 posted on 08/05/2010 5:47:25 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Recusal, anybody?


13 posted on 08/05/2010 5:57:40 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

Like THAT is going to happen. There is no such thing as an unbiased liberal. When it comes to liberal issues, liberals have their minds made up before they hear the first argument.


14 posted on 08/05/2010 6:05:07 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Satan is a Democrat and Obama is his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
Only a statist would believe an inspection of the applicants genitalia was a condition precedent to being issued a license to marry.

Only a whacko would believe two men could marry...

15 posted on 08/05/2010 7:20:13 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Judge Walker is a dipsh6t with a less than mediocre mind but you can’t disqualify judges based on where willy or wilma cozies up. Everybody cozies up somewhere.


16 posted on 08/05/2010 7:22:06 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

How did HE get this issue to rule on, and why did this come before him, anyway?


17 posted on 08/05/2010 8:35:31 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I don’t get it - what does Anne Frank have to do with this article???


18 posted on 08/05/2010 8:41:53 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What is the appeal process to vacate the judges ruling on the grounds that he wasn’t impartial to the issue under adjudication?


19 posted on 08/05/2010 10:09:22 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
He should have recused himself.

But he didn't, and he knew what the hell he was doing because he tried to get cameras in his courtroom but that ruling was shot down by the USSC.

He wanted cameras in there because he wanted this show trial to become a national spectacle, with himself playing the leading role.  He wanted the whole country to see just what sort of wonton disregard he has for the rule of law, the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution.

20 posted on 08/06/2010 1:46:39 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (In 2012: The Rookie and The Wookie get booted from the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson