Shame on this gay judge for NOT recusing himself from this case!! ON TO THE SUPREMES! >:-(
I wouldn’t have expected any other “decision” from a “gay” judge. Banning homosexual “marriage” is un-gaylike.
Voters just don’t matter to the courts! Especially, this one!
Bush I’s fault
End of “Consent of the Governed” ping.
Here in WI we banned homosexual marriage and our Supremes upheld it. So is homo marriage legal or not?
Just another example of the judiciary controlling the people’s decisions. State’s rights has long been nullified.
Judge voids...on California voters.
The reality is that same-sex couples could be allowed to engage in the rights associated with marriage. The problem is, however, the courts and politics have a problem with thinking that the two could work separately. Civil Unions have been around for quite some time.
There is no doubt in my mind that any man who does what gay men do to each other is absolutely insane and should be treated as such. God will not be mocked, and every day more people who agree with stoning as the remedy make this country their home; in the end, they will be the determining factor in putting sodomy laws back on the books and driving the perverts back into their closets. While it is an “un-American” solution, demographics are on their side.
It’s usually a bad idea to let the govt get its fingers in anything. Govt grants marriage licenses and govt makes rules, bureaucrats proliferate...rules multiply...meanwhile the nation deteriorates into a democracy.
Seems like there’s a point at which civilization can no longer sustain itself, like a tower to the sky that topples when it reaches a structural limit, or a lifeboat with too many people grappling to get in, or a human giant who dies of growing.
Gay marriage is just another fracture in the collapse.
This judge is preposterous. First through mentally deformed gymnastics he redefines the 5000 year history of marriage in a couple of throw away sentences, and then casually as slipping into a hot tub with five naked guys, he claims that our Constitution always included this new definition for men to marry men. It dovetails so perfectly with what the Constitution says - or what he wants it to say.
Why even have a Constitution if you are going to vandalize with this monstrosity. If this Judge, a self proclaimed chandelier repairman, had a speck of honesty, he would say that this issue is completely beyond him and that no where in the law could this right possibly exist - and then urge the supporters of it to petition for a Constitutional Amendment. And good luck with that. I can’t stand this cavalier countermanding of the democratic process all for the sake on in vogue beliefs.
No more judges as kings.
This queer judge Walker needs to be removed from office immediately. Hopefully the voters in California can teach this pervert a lesson.
They are. Why should the judge think otherwise?
Meanwhile, I see nothing that precludes gay people from getting married. Lot's of gay and lesbian people are married, with the same rights as every other human being in this country -- to someone of the opposite sex.
Heterosexuals can't marry people of the same sex, just like Homosexuals. The rights are identical.
The judge confuses rights with desires. The fact that a homosexual might not WANT to marry a person of the opposite sex does not change the fact that they have the right to do so; the fact that a heterosexual might not WANT to marry a person of the same sex does not change the fact that the heterosexual is banned from doing so.
I think the judge should next forbid the NBA from preventing me from being a center for the LA Lakers. After all, it's not my fault I'm 50 years old and a 5-foot 5-inch white guy. I should obviously have the same rights to play center for the LA lakers as some really tall black guy. Equal rights and all.
.
The judge decalred sexual behavior as an IMMUTABLE trait.
IOW all sex crimes are “born that way” and gurantees protection under the fundamental right to orgasm.