Posted on 08/04/2010 1:45:48 PM PDT by tsmith130
Court enjoins enforcement of Prop 8... Will be released at 2 pm pt...
Judge strikes down 'Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California'..
Thanks for that. I figured it would be. But this one is just long enough to hear rebuttal from plaintiff, after which a decision for a more lengthy stay will be made.
The district court also issued an order [linked] granting a temporary stay of its ruling until the recently filed motion for a stay pending appeal can be fully briefed and decided.The order reads as follows ...
Posted at 05:11 PM by Howard Bashman
Defendant-intervenors ("proponents") have moved to stay the court's judgment pending appeal. Doc #705. They noticed the motion for October 21, 2010 and moved to shorten time. Doc #706.The motion to shorten time is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs, plaintiff-intervenor and defendants are DIRECTED to submit their responses to the motion to stay on or before August 6, 2010, at which time the motion will stand submitted without a hearing unless otherwise ordered.
The clerk shall STAY entry of judgment herein until the motion to stay pending appeal, Doc #705, has been decided.
This is as morally and legally corrupt as it gets. This judge just castrated the votes of the majority of California. What will stop this tyranny!
Sodomy is not a virtue. It is a sin.
Looks like the judge has granted a stay pending appeal. It's only for a few days however....
That’s why folks on our side who say, “I’m for states’ rights, so let the states decide for themselves about gay marriage” are wrong. California decided, and a judge took it away. If it wasn’t for activists judges, states’ rights would be a great position for a conservative to take, but it isn’t realistic now.
If equal protection is the issue then about 50 million of us now need to file lawsuits.
If the government must treat every equally then lets force it.
If they give free medical, schools, food, housing to one, it must be given to all. It is not equal to tax one citizen at 35% and not another.
If equal protection means equal then we need to get a website and group together and sue so that all of us pay the same percentage in taxes and not citizen is given anything not equality given to another.
My thought. What is to keep Muslims from having more than one wife? It would seem to be their right, even more so as it is called for in their religion. The concept of marriage is now not what we were taught, it is now whatever relationship you want.
Bingo.
How can a state Constitution violate due process? The Constitution IS due process. Geez.
Not really a big deal IMHO. The west has already undermined marriage so much between heterosexuals that its almost a dead institution. This just drives the last nail in the coffin.
Why put it to a vote by the California people in the first place? =.=
macsnob: “you have a very sexy apple logo Miss Ipad.”
(ok but the law can’t stop a macsnob from marrying their ipadd)
It’s pretty d*mned discouraging. You have to figure that a state as liberal as CA that votes twice against gay marriage is really making a statement for the country and still a judge comes in negates our votes.
We are now *Mysterey Babylon* or the *Roman Empire*
What’s next? A Mosque near *Ground Zero* Sharia Law.
New World Order, Mark of the Beast...
Yep right on target.....
This WORLD belongs to the Antichrist and his minions in government.
Does anyone know if a stay was granted until appeal, or did Walker schedule that for another hearing 2 or 3 months down the road?
From page 116:
That the majority of California voters supported Proposition 8 is irrelevant, as “fundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.”
Irrelevant?!
See my post @ 203. Stay granted for a few days.
Apparently there was no reason to do so. The judge says it's irrelevant. From page 116:
That the majority of California voters supported Proposition 8 is irrelevant, as “fundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.”
Irrelevant?!
See post 201
stay for a few days for the appeal to take place?
Then stayed pending appeal?
Could this homosexual judge know that his ruling is wishful thinking and a “hail mary” pass?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.