Cheers!
In the Eu birthright citizenship is not allowed.
Lets start with that one.
The Constitution is not a recipe.
To me, the biggest question is a short one — “why”?
Why do we need to look for foreign laws for “ideas”, when our judges are supposed to apply our American laws and interpret the U.S. Constitution? Why do they need “ideas” to help them interpret and apply our laws?
Does Ruthie mean that we look to foreign countries laws for liberal leaning legal concepts? For example, I understand that Saudi Arabia incorporates the Koran and Sharia Law into their civil laws. Certainly Ruthie doesn’t want to look there for “ideas” does she????
Did they cut out her gizzard or her frontal lobes ~ ? I keep forgetting that, not that it'd make any difference.
She thinks she should be writing the laws now?
If we’re going to look across space, why not time as well? I’m starting to think a few witch trials may be in order.
It’s OK to look at foreign laws. For Congress to do when making new US laws, but not for the Supreme Court, whose job is to enforce the US Constitution, and laws made in accordance with it.
It’s OK to look at foreign laws. For Congress to do when making new US laws, but not for the Supreme Court, whose job is to enforce the US Constitution, and laws made in accordance with it.
Thank you. You can go back to your nap now, Ruthie!
She has no idea what the Constitution is, or what the role of the Supremes is.
Like many people these days.
That’s rich,
And what was it the Romans did to Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgs kind?
Soooo, let’s look on other countries habits?
She may have something there. For example, maybe we should look at Mexico’s laws regarding the prosecution of illegal aliens in THEIR country.
Which foreign countries? North Korea? Haiti? Myanmar? Iran? Sudan?
Where else could she look? In the constitution?
It’s just fine for legislators to look at a law in some foreign country and say, “Hey that might work here.” For a judge to say, “France has such and such law, so therefore our law is now the same” is legal adultery.
I sure don’t think I should be making French or German law, so I don’t know why judges think the French or Germans should be making our laws. Heck, probably the French and German don’t want it either.
Our system may not be perfect, but it is well ahead of anything else in the world, and I don’t see the need to review international/foreigh/sharia or any other law.
...because foreign law allows things the Constitution never would. But if one can try to cirmumvent the Constitution using other legal systems and terminology, in order to fool everyday Americans, at least those who may care.
Our system may not be perfect, but it is well ahead of anything else in the world, and I don’t see the need to review international/foreign/sharia or any other law.
Cheers!
Incompetent and dangerous to occupy lifetime seats
Impeachment time for Ginsburg. Sotormayor should follow. These aren’t judicial minds, they’re fakes.