Posted on 07/30/2010 8:41:52 AM PDT by Jack Black
A second civil war in the United States would be an unparalleled disaster. Nobody who is sane and who has studied modern civil wars from Spain to Lebanon to the Balkans and beyond would ever wish to see one occur. But if political, cultural and demographic trends are sweeping us toward that unhappy destiny, it would be wise to at least cast a weather eye over the possible terrain.
First, a caveat. I am not going to waste our time making politically-correct genuflections after every controversial sentence, because this essay is intended to be read by mature and rational adults.
Before we move on to the cube, let’s begin with the CW2 Square. The cube is best tackled in another step. Draw the square and label one axis Poorer to Richer. Label the other axis Darker to Lighter. Darker, for brevity, includes African-Americans, Hispanics and so on. Lighter refers to those of European ancestry. The two opposed meta-groups are the poorer and darker versus the richer and lighter, or whiter if you wish to be blunt. The richer/whiter have the power of their wealth, but counterbalancing that advantage is the fact that the poorer/darker have succeeded in wresting control of much of government power. This is so, even if most of their elected leaders are anything but poor or dark.
Now, before you scream out your exceptions, yes, there are rich black cattle ranchers and poor whites living in blighted urban areas and so on. However, to focus on them is to miss the critical centers of gravity of Civil War Two for the over-study of interesting but insignificant outliers. Filling one corner of the CW2 Square will be the poorer and darker, who primarily are liberal and progressive Democrats who believe in a malleable “living Constitution.” And in the other corner will be the richer and whiter, who mainly are conservative or libertarian Republicans who believe in the original intent of the written Constitution. Again, keep your eyes on the two meta-cores, not the exceptions.
Now, let’s add the third dimension and shoot another axis out from the square to form the CW2 Cube. Label the third axis Urban versus Rural, or City versus Country if you prefer. This axis gives a geographical dimension to the meta-terrain, but there will be no convenient dividing line between the opposed sides as there was during the first civil war. It has frequently been observed that today’s red-blue political map is better understood at the county than at the state level. Even blue states like Illinois, California and New York are rural-red outside of their blue urban cores. Obviously, these urban cores are heavily populated but geographically small, with all that means to the electoral process today and to a possible civil war later.
So the opposing corners of the CW2 Cube can be seen as the poorer, darker cities versus the richer, whiter rural areas. Again, don’t quibble about outliers. Yes, there are a few rich, conservative African-Americans living in Wyoming, many poor white liberal Democrats in rural West Virginia, some rich conservatives in San Francisco and every other exceptional case imaginable.
Most of us live in the mushy, mongrel middle, far from the tips of the two opposite corners. But the centers of gravity of Civil War Two shall be as I have described: the relatively richer, whiter and more rural against the poorer, darker and urban. One can also propose many more axes of conflict than can fit on a cube, such as the religious versus the non-believers, socialists versus capitalists, statists versus individualists and so on. However, after you reflect upon the CW2 Cube, I think you will find that most of these extra axes can be overlaid parallel to one of the three already posited.
*******
So, of what use is the CW2 Cube, other than in providing a conceptual map for Civil War Two? In my research as a novelist who attempts to write realistic fiction about the coming years, I have long been a student of modern civil wars. One repeated lesson of modern civil war is that there is inherently dangerous, even fatal terrain. Some of this predictably-dangerous terrain is often highly desirable and even advantageous before the outbreak of civil war.
To begin: you do not want to live as a trapped and cut-off minority in what might become “enemy territory.” If you live amidst your civil war enemies, as defined and located within the CW2 Cube, you will be in mortal danger even if your immediate neighbors know, love and respect you. Those persons who have a stake in fanning the flames of CW2 (and their number shall be legion), will intentionally target those remaining “holdouts” who may be respected minority neighbors. (In this essay, minority means “the minority within a given group or area.” Blacks are the majority in some areas, and whites are the minorities in others, and so on.)
Frequently in modern civil wars, roaming armed groups (in or out of uniform) will even force people to kill their own beloved and respected minority neighbors as an ultimate loyalty test. If they refuse, they may themselves be killed as “traitors.” Besides pre-conflict racists and radicals, there will be an ever-increasing pool of persons attempting to expel minorities from their homes. Those embittered unfortunates who have already been ethnically cleansed will be seeking new living quarters, and the homes and property of “enemy” minorities still living in majority territory will be the first on the chopping block. (Not the auction block, because payment of any kind is rarely offered.) This process of minority eviction becomes self-perpetuating.
Often, those members of minorities who escape as refugees are the lucky ones who do not lose their lives during the back-and-forth of escalating violence. The fact that they may have been loved, admired and respected for many years by their majority-population neighbors will not protect them. This is a clear lesson of modern civil war. Another is that while the rich or the well-to-do can sometimes hide their wealth and pass as proles, the same cannot be said about concealing one’s racial or ethnic identity. Religious affiliation and political leanings can also be hidden, but outward appearance cannot. Civil War Two may begin on purely political grounds, but it will devolve into something worse.
Does this mean that all white city-dwellers should head for the hinterland, or that dark-skinned folks living in the country should move to the city? It’s not for me to say. We all hope and pray that there will never be a second “hot civil war” in America, instead of merely the “cold civil war” we are engaged in today. But the lessons of modern civil wars should not be ignored. Another lesson is that it will take tremendous moral courage to defy the hot-heads and radicals, and shield your minority neighbors from harm. Think of Anne Frank. Think of those indescribably brave inhabitants of the former Yugoslavia who hid their minority neighbors, when the discovery of that fact could and often did lead to their own deaths.
*******
While Civil War Two is on the table for discussion, allow me to introduce two aggravating factors that don’t fit neatly on the cube. The first is the concept of multiple embedded minorities. Picture the old cartoon mainstay showing a line of fish getting ready to gobble another fish, from the leviathan down to the small fry. You might live in a neighborhood where you are in the majority, but the neighborhood is in a town where you are in the minority. And the town is surrounded by a larger area where your own kind once again predominates.
Or you might fit into the picture as the smallest of all fish, living in the only minority household within a majority neighborhood. From street to neighborhood to city to state to region can easily place you in the middle of several levels of embedded minorities-within-majorities. This formulation might work for many decades during times of relative prosperity and well-being, but during a civil war it is a recipe for disaster, as unstable as nitroglycerin-filled bowling pins. It’s all cool just as long as the pins are standing still and calmly hanging out together, but look out when the Black Swan bowling ball comes rolling in! An unstoppable chain reaction ensues, as each new act of violence is avenged up and down the line.
Remember that funny line-of-fish cartoon, and imagine it a few seconds later when the biting begins. It’s not so funny then -- especially for the smaller fish.
The second aggravating factor is the unstable triangle of the three-sided civil war. The Bosnian Serbs, Croats and Muslims provide a classic example. Each side of the unstable triangle will backstab yesterday’s ally at the moment they perceive themselves to be at a local disadvantage, or when they see an opportunity to wipe out an historic enemy with a new Final Solution. The unstable ethnic triangle in the United States will in many places be composed of black, white and Hispanic sides. By comparison, the old black and white social dichotomy was inherently stable, even when it might have been rife with injustice.
In some areas, Asians, Middle-easterners, Native Americans and other groups will contribute to the formation of regional social geometries that are even more unstable than the unstable triangle. Study modern civil wars and you will cringe at the implications. A steel roller-coaster overloaded with old dynamite and electric blasting caps during a lightning storm comes to my mind.
And finally, some urban settings are just disastrous during a modern civil war, even if they might offer a terrific quality of life during peacetime. Perhaps the top the list of danger areas are high-rise buildings located near potential civil war flashpoints or fault lines. Living in a cluster of high-rises divided by a “green line” during a guerrilla sniper war is a worst-case horror show. Not to mention the misery attendant to life in a tall building without running water, electricity, sewage service, working elevators, heating or air-conditioning. While under intermittent sniper fire. For months.
So should you stay or should you go? If you don’t believe that another civil war in America is possible, then simply disregard this column. But if you think that a second civil war could happen then picture the CW2 Cube and map your location within it. If you think that you live near a possible civil war fault line, especially as a local minority, consider relocating.
After the fact, a common sentiment heard from urbane, secular Bosnians living in the Olympic City of Sarajevo expressed complete disbelief that a brutal, bloody civil war could have come to their modern European city and tear their lives apart.
But it did.
A parting suggestion to students of modern civil war is to read “Seasons in Hell: Understanding Bosnia’s War” by the British journalist Ed Vulliamy. It’s currently collecting dust at your local public library, waiting only to be read.
Forewarned is forearmed.
Matthew Bracken is the author of the “Enemies” trilogy, beginning with 2003's “Enemies Foreign And Domestic”. For more information, go to http://www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com/
See also Misha Glenny's The Third Balkan War for his account of what happens when a society commits autogenocide.
You may be right about the outcome of the fight itself, if there is one, but I think you're wrong about the death of socialism and statism. They're just symptoms that spring inevitably from certain weaknesses in human nature. That's why the Founding Fathers tried to build so many obstacles to them. It was a danger they saw repeated throughout history. A CWII wouldn't alter human nature.
Take her on a trip through the southern tier of NY state. Some nice country here, reliably red, but outvoted by the urbs.
If taxes are a concern, be a snowbird.
An economic collapse could, conceivably, lead to a civil war, though a civil war is not inevitable, nor even a very likely result of that collapse. Riots would make sense, but not war. Were it to happen, however, it probably would create the sort of sides that Mr. Bracken suggests.
There is some merit to the general idea that a war might have a distinct ethnic/socioeconomic cast, but the details are what matter, and they're not spelled out. What's important there, however, is the concentration of populations. If one side is defined by poor/color, those people will be concentrated in urban areas.
As usual, the actual contours of such a war would be defined by logistics; in particular, food, water, resources, and manufacturing capabilities.
Manufacturing is in urban areas; but the people who would be fighting on the poor/color side would not be employed in those industries, and the infrastructure that feeds them would break down in any case. The ability to wage war would be limited to supplies on hand. Urban areas would quickly be starved out due to the disruption of food and water supplies.
The idea of government control is glossed over -- but the implication that it would support the poor/color side is not remotely convincing.
The real response of government and, more importantly, the military, would be driven by the circumstances of how this supposed war breaks out. If it were to happen at all, it would almost certainly begin in the form of riots on the poor/color side of the equation; and in that case, the government (including the military infrastructure) would come down against the poor/color side.
But really, it's not a convincing scenario in the first place.
Actually, it is almost exactly what the Confederate leaders thought about the North's ability to fight a war. And look how that turned out for them.
You forget that they have a globe full of supporters who want to see the fall of the US, if only just to see it, and maybe shake up the World Order. Once things get rolling, 1-2 million Mexicans start taking over New Mexico, Arizona, Southern California, southern Colorado, and even Western Texas (despite the common Texans' confidence to the contrary). Then Chavez, Putin, Castro (Raul, not Fidel), start sending trained and seasoned men, along with materiel... and foodstuffs from their slave-wage farmers. Kim Jong Il sends men in exchange for foodstuffs for NK. China plays the "mature" card, and happily watches as most of the West eats itself (Europe, without the US military presence stabilizing it, then has its own wars coming within a decade... with Muslim wildcards making things really interesting.)
For those experienced hunters with scoped armss at home who wouldn't mind expressing their intense anger at the decades-long Progressive Movement by applying Rule 308, I merely repeat the adage: beware of what you ask for... you just might get it.
“they would have trouble recruiting and controlling military or police personnel to commit atrocities on the scale needed to cow the population”
Thus Obama’s civilian defense force. Same size and budget of the real military.
We can’t let it get to that point.
+
This is why they will bring in foriegn troops. We are in for a very, long hard slog.
=
As the "Enemy of the State" these two items combined will make the insurgencies in Iraq & Afghanistan look like cub scouts, especially when you factor in the mass defections and/or sit-out of many LEO and military members, the "oath keepers" if you will.
"Inviting" foreign/UN troops to quell the American People would be an open declaration of war on the American People. Very few countries would likely participate, and those that did would make the declaration too obvious for our own military to tolerate.
Tell that to Zimbabwe
For the Minuteman’s or the Tridents...don’t they require launch/activation codes that REQUIRE a code sent from Washington/Pentagon/Strike Command to enable the warheads?
If ‘rebels’ get a hold of these missiles, without the launch/enable codes, wouldn’t they then be rendered a moot point?
I was under the impression codes were needed to arm that aren't present at the weapon location. Perhaps there's even codes capable of activating a range safety charge or igniting the propellant in place.
In your case, that would seem to be a redundancy. :)
Actually, it's not a redundancy but being specific. It eliminates hittable alligators, wombats, water buffalo, platypi, trees, the crack in the couch...
It may well be. The MSM propagandists are practicing as I type this.
...and as Tijeras Slim pointed out, I omitted all of those who work for the government who will side with the non-payers.
We are perilously close to societal breakdown - I fear.
Invest in precious metal; gold, silver and brass.
Bravo Zulu!!!
Too right. I drove through there yesterday on my way up to Sandpoint and I was lucky to get out of the ghetto alive. When TSHTF it's gonna be the RealTree People versus the Mossy Oak Gang and you wouldn't want to be in the middle. It'll make the carnage at the Cabelas sale displays last Christmas week look like a tea party by comparison.
On a serious note, for those who don't already live in relatively secure territory, have a plan. Do your networking. Have a place to go and get out in time to get there. If there's one commonality in all the civil war scenarios all over the planet it's that you do not want to wind up in a refugee camp.
if push comes to shove, i expect to see MANY bridges coming down, like ALL of the ones going into/out of, DC, NYC, Boston, SanFran, Detroit, Chicago, etc to try and keep the rabble in the cities or at least make it as hard as possible for them to get out...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.