Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Yep, she’z no stranger to litigation.
She’z tryin to hit one outta the park with a big ol payday.
To: SeekAndFind
Cranial rectal inversion, methinks.
3 posted on
07/29/2010 12:35:32 PM PDT by
Wicket
(God bless and protect our troops and God bless America)
To: SeekAndFind
I’m gonna sue Sherrod, as an agribusiness man of pale complection I view her and her husband’s rants as slander.
4 posted on
07/29/2010 12:35:40 PM PDT by
junta
(S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
To: SeekAndFind
She doesn’t have a prayer.
5 posted on
07/29/2010 12:36:07 PM PDT by
jpl
(It's "My Big Fat Deadly Greek Riot", coming soon to a bankrupt socialist state near you.)
To: SeekAndFind; All
So posting an unedited video of a public speech is against the law now?
Breitbart posted the full video he had in his possession to the best of my knowledge.
6 posted on
07/29/2010 12:36:56 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
To: SeekAndFind
She will lose...he posted the entire video on the first day and can’t be blamed for her boss’ apparent ADD (since he acted before viewing the whole video)
8 posted on
07/29/2010 12:37:46 PM PDT by
CAluvdubya
(WASS!)
To: SeekAndFind
I hope Breitbart sues for every penny sherrod has. She is guilty of slander and libel. He showed an actual clip of her—and the left does clips all the time with no fear of reprisal.
9 posted on
07/29/2010 12:37:46 PM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: SeekAndFind
Enter the lawyers....the REAL power in the once proud Republic.
To: SeekAndFind
For possessing a tape that caused the president to act stupidly?
12 posted on
07/29/2010 12:39:25 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: SeekAndFind
Yeah, he’s the one who fired her without doing an investigation.
14 posted on
07/29/2010 12:39:47 PM PDT by
whence911
(Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
To: SeekAndFind
Where is she now? The czarina of something?
15 posted on
07/29/2010 12:40:50 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: SeekAndFind
16 posted on
07/29/2010 12:41:03 PM PDT by
dhuynh73
(Reagan Country)
To: SeekAndFind
posted an edited video I guess ole Juornolist Ben doesn't know the difference between edit and excerpt.
She was for racism before she was against it anyway.
17 posted on
07/29/2010 12:41:06 PM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
(RIP Bahbah. Did you plug the damn border yet daddy! Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: SeekAndFind
I bet Brietbart is licking his chops at the prospect of taking her deposition. This is definitely a popcorn worthy event.
To: SeekAndFind
“The edited video posted by Andrew Breitbart led Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to ask Sherrod to resign, a decision he reconsidered after seeing the entire video of her March speech to a local NAACP group.”
So, basically, this is a matter for the courts because Tom Vilsack (he had nothing to do with it, obviously, but going along with the story) was too lazy to click on a link.
To: SeekAndFind
People who publicly give speeches about “hatin whitey” suing. Unreal.
22 posted on
07/29/2010 12:42:55 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(Democrats = Party of I*lam)
To: SeekAndFind
ROTFLOL Shirley, you're not only a racist you're stupid.
"You know, I haven't seen such a mean-spirited people as I've seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn't it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush's and we didn't do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President." Shirley Sherrod 3/27/2010 @ Georgia NAACP meeting
----------------------------------------------
While appearing on Anderson Coopers 360, Sherrod stated that Breitbart would like to get us stuck back in the time of slavery.
23 posted on
07/29/2010 12:43:35 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: SeekAndFind
So, now it's against the rules to expose a black racist? That's all Breitbart did, after all.
By rights, she should be suing Vilsack and the USDA - oh, but she's already done that before on another racebaiting charge.
What statute covers this case, the "thin skin" law? All that Breitbart did was embarass her - which she deserved based on her remarks in the tape.
The NAACP bellowed for weeks about all of the "racists" in the TPM, but none could prove it...all Breitbart did was actually PROVE there were racists in the NAACP.
Here's the advice they need to take next time..."Don't start nothin', and there won't be nothin'".
26 posted on
07/29/2010 12:44:04 PM PDT by
FrankR
(It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
To: SeekAndFind; All
Why isn't she suing the NAACP and the obama administration????
30 posted on
07/29/2010 12:46:26 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
To: SeekAndFind
This is excellent IMO.
It keeps this Sherrod hypocrite in front of the people and exposing the NAACP, White House and all of the racist marxists for what they are.
GO BREITBART!
31 posted on
07/29/2010 12:46:51 PM PDT by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Marxism is Evil.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson