I say almost the same thing to people except, I say "here are some Goodyears so you won't have to wrap your purse around your gun when you shoot it, and you might as well give those made out of wood things to me."
Posted on 07/26/2010 11:03:55 AM PDT by marktwain
It’s official: gun ownership is trendy. When a prime exemplar of the liberal press publishes a “Come to Jesus (Armed)” feature, you know it’s only a matter of time before every state in the these here United becomes a “shall issue” state. Yes, even California, Rhode Island and New York. The press release for Harper’s Magazine’s August cover story Happiness is a Worn Gun: My Concealed Weapon and Me tells the tale of a left-leaning jobbing journo who gets serious wood for firearms. . .
Baum’s text (provided by Harper’s Magazine to TTAG) doesn’t really answer the crucial question: does carrying a firearm change one’s political views? He gets close, but there’s no cigar.
"Shooters see their guns as emblems of a whole spectrum of virtuous lifestyle choices— rural over urban, self-reliance over dependence on the collective, vigorous outdoorsiness over pallid intellectualism, patriotism over interna- tionalism, action over inaction—and they hear attacks on guns as attacks on them, personally. The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence and the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence sound like groups even the NRA could support: who wouldn’t want to prevent violence? But the former was called, until 1989, the National Coalition to Ban Handguns, and the latter wants to prohibit the “military-style semi-automatic assault weapons” popular among shooters. From the point of view of gun enthusiasts, it’s not gun violence these groups want to end, but gun ownership."
And? And nothing, really. Baum ignores the obvious conflict of interest between his liberal upbringing and the consequences of his acceptance of gun ownership. He expresses sympathy for gun owners’ contempt for “sheep” living in “condition” white, while expressing a deep longing to re-immerse himself in non-gun owners’ obliviousness.
And then he cuts right. Making a passionate case for eliminating gun free zones as killing fields.
"Unless we’re willing to send the police door-to-door to round them all up, the country is going to be awash in fire- arms for years to come. Thugs will push guns into the faces of convenience-store clerks, lunatics will shoot up restaurants, aggrieved workers will spray their offices with bullets, and alienated students will open fire at school. The question that interests gun activists is how we’re prepared to respond. A Republican legislator in Wisconsin wanted to arm teachers so they could cut down Columbine copycats, and college students in Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Michigan, Texas, and Virginia are agitating for the right to carry concealed weapons on campus so they can defend themselves against the next Virginia Tech–style shooter. An armed civilian might be even more useful during a massacre than a po- lice officer; cops hit the people they’re aiming at less than half the time—in some departments much less. That might be because criminals identify police by their uniforms and so get the first shot off. A civilian might have the element of surprise."
Notice the use of the word “we.” Baum is solidly out of the closet as a self-identified “gun activist.” Ay there’s the rub. Gun rights activists find little if any suport on the left side of the political spectrum, and a tremendous amount of opposition. In the main, you buys your bullets, you votes Republican.
Baum goes a lot further, if not far enough.
"It’s true that crime is down, but it’s certainly not nonexistent; hideous things happen to good people every day. We carry fire insurance even though fire is uncommon; carrying a gun may be no more paranoid. Expecting police protection is delusional; they’ll usually do no more than show up later to investigate. Carrying a gun is unsafe for those who haven’t been properly trained, but a good class and regular practice can fix that. Only the last two reasons strike me as logically complete arguments not to go armed. Being willing to die rather than kill is an admi- rable and time-honored philosophical position. I’m not certain, though, how many of us would hold to it when the fatal moment was upon us. I, for one, count myself out. I’m willing."
But not willing to accept the idea that IF American civilians continue to arm themselves, they will lose their innocence. Which is exactly the difference between the left and the right on gun control, and everything else for that matter. One side is suffused with idealism, the other afraid of its own shadow.
Personally, I prefer my liberal pal David’s intellectual honesty to Mr. Baum bi-polar ballistics. “The right have guns,” David likes to say. “So we need guns too.” Personally, I side with Benjamin Franklin. It’s better to be a pessimist and pleasantly surprised than an optimist and constantly disappointed. And/or a victim.
I say almost the same thing to people except, I say "here are some Goodyears so you won't have to wrap your purse around your gun when you shoot it, and you might as well give those made out of wood things to me."
She probably had the little ones stack arms to run the camera. The stack collapsed. Darn kids.
I prefer the Garand.
Nice wood. I have several gathering dust around the house. All replaced with Pacmayer grips. When I pull the trigger on the old .44 mag my hand doesn’t vibrate afterward and I don’t loose any skin with the checkering acting like sandpaper on my palms.
Slim got a nice piece of stick on this one. Very partial to "cokes" on my N-frames too. Love to get a pair of Keith Brown's Ropers.
Serious Wood.
The pic doesn’t do it justice, it’s got orange tiger stripe highlights.
The other side is identical in pattern.
E ahu la ula.
Wider is better.
There is no logic in this belief. It has no basis in reality. I lived in West Milford, New Jersey, an exurb of New York City. It was densely wooded and had plenty of bears, coyotes, and coy-dogs. They didn't bother me at all.
I now live in a South Florida city of over 100,000 people. Those urbane, collective, pallid intellectuals tend to murder people at astonishing rates. I don't leave my apartment without my gun. I'd really rather not carry it. It's heavy and bulky and sometimes it's a pain in the ass to conceal it. But the Broward County Sheriff's helicopter keeps coming back every week, looking for those pallid intellectuals who get into philosophical debates over ownership and property rights with employees at convenience stores and gas stations. Inevitably, the debating team resorts to knives and guns to carry the side.
Cities I do not find to be especially pleasant or communal. I find myself having to go armed amidst the pallid intellectuals. I didn't have to do that in the rural parts of this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.