Skip to comments.
MediaCurves: New Sarah Palin Ad Focusing on Conservative Women Scores with Viewers
Mediacurves ^
| Sunday July 25, 2010
Posted on 07/25/2010 2:59:08 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
*Majority of viewers respond positively to Palin's new ad *
A new national study among 300 self-reported Democrats, Republicans and Independents revealed that after viewing a new ad featuring Sarah Palin and produced by SarahPAC, viewers were more likely to vote for Palin if she ran for president in 2012.
The study was conducted during July 9-12 by HCD Research using its MediaCurves.com® website, to obtain Americans perceptions of a new ad by SarahPAC, a political action committee, which was focused on mobilizing conservative women.
Respondents were asked to rate Sarah Palin on a scale from 1-7 regarding likeability, believability and sincerity, with 1 representing not at all strong in this attribute and 7 representing extremely strong in this attribute.
Among all parties likeability, believability and sincerity ratings increased after viewing the commercial. The most notable increase was her likeability and believability ratings among Independents, which increased from 3.7 to 4.4 and from 3.3 to 3.7 respectively. In addition, Republicans dramatically increased their support for Palin as a potential candidate in the 2012 presidential election from 56% to 65% after viewing the ad.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; elections; mamagrizzlies; palin; pinkelephants; rinos; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
If her ad scored well with the left-leaning, MediaCurves focus group, it most likely played extremely well across the country for those who saw it.
Even does who don't like Sarah on FR or around the country will have to grudgingly admit that she has a history of having natural political skills and being politically savvy when she is in control....her political run in 2006 was brilliant
To: Bigtigermike
To: Bigtigermike
Her endorsements have proven to be a hot item.
3
posted on
07/25/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
To: Clintonfatigued
Sarah Palin on Media Curves ... you gotta love it ...
4
posted on
07/25/2010 3:18:46 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(Each day, I await a fresh insult to America by this usurper...he never fails to deliver.)
To: Bigtigermike
As any one in construction knows; anything solid has a wide and very tight and secure base.
It starts at the bottom folks and goes up. No like our pResident who was painted as a savior on the basis of two words alone: Hope & Change. This came from the top (Media) and was no more than straw in the wind. Our pResident no longer has a base that will give him a second term, nor I feel one that will prevent him from losing both houses in Nov.
Sarah is a mother and a very good one at that. She is as tight with us as she is with her family.
5
posted on
07/25/2010 3:18:59 PM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(Give me a hand up, not a hand out)
To: Bigtigermike
I'm wary of any appeal to gender or race, or to any characteristic besides simply being an American. Too much like the progressive's game.
So I hope this is being done carefully.
6
posted on
07/25/2010 3:19:50 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Bigtigermike
If her ad scored well with the left-leaning, MediaCurves focus group, it most likely played extremely well across the country for those who saw it.
Of course. But for the Palin haters on this site, they will simply brush it off as proof that the media wants Palin to be the GOP nominee. And if the media supposedly wants Palin to be the nominee, we must oppose her for that very reason. At least that is their twisted logic. You see, Palin can't win with them. If she gets bad press or a bad poll, then she can't be the nominee because she is "unelectable". If she gets good press or a good poll, then she can't be the nominee because she is "being picked by the media". I'll be shocked if we don't see such posts on this thread. Perhaps shining the light on these cockroaches before they come out of their holes will keep them at bay, at least for this thread.
7
posted on
07/25/2010 3:27:36 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: BornToBeAmerican
Obama’s support was, as they say “a mile wide, but an inch deep”.
8
posted on
07/25/2010 5:22:02 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: GLDNGUN
Strange that down is good on that graph.....
9
posted on
07/25/2010 5:27:55 PM PDT
by
bicyclerepair
(FR - my online family. From Ft. Lauderdale, Florida)
To: Bigtigermike
I guess Bob J, pissedpants, and OldDoucheHand are really trying hard to pretend this doesn’t mean anything. bwahahaha.
10
posted on
07/25/2010 5:50:15 PM PDT
by
JApost
To: SuziQ
Obamas support was, as they say a mile wide, but an inch deep.
Kind of like my anology of 0's base being painted by the msm
11
posted on
07/25/2010 6:00:22 PM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(Give me a hand up, not a hand out)
To: JApost; Bob J; pissant; OldDeckHand
Please ping your fellow FReepers when you talk trash about them, newbie.
To: rabscuttle385
KMA, moron...do you want to call me a newbie?
13
posted on
08/08/2010 9:29:16 AM PDT
by
gogeo
("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
To: gogeo
Excuse me, I never referred to you in post 12 at all.
To: rabscuttle385
Excuse me, I never referred to you in post 12 at all... Doesn't really matter, does it?
15
posted on
08/08/2010 11:07:11 AM PDT
by
gogeo
("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
To: gogeo; JApost; paulycy; darkangel82; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; ...
Doesn't really matter, does it?So basically you're picking a fight for no reason at all. I called JAPost (signup date Jan. 20, 2009) a newbie, and JAPost is, relative to me (signup date Nov. 8, 2006). Yet along you (signup date Jun. 24, 2001) come, telling me out of the blue "KMA, moron."
Is there something you want to confess here, gogeo?
Are you in fact JAPost? And, if you are in fact JAPost, are you aware that having multiple FR accounts may potentially be a violation of FR posting guidelines (namely #11, "Don't represent yourself as another person, create or use another screen name to avoid a revocation of posting privileges")?
Or, if you are not in fact JAPost, then your personal attacks is wholly uncalled for and unprovoked, not to mention that the FR comment posting utility explicitly discourages personal attacks.
Inquiring minds want to know.
16
posted on
08/08/2010 11:51:55 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
17
posted on
08/08/2010 12:13:37 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Let this chant follow BHO everywhere he goes: "You lie. You lie. You lie.")
To: JApost; Admin Moderator; All
I guess Bob J, pissedpants, and OldDoucheHand are really trying hard to pretend this doesnt mean anything. bwahahaha.”
Not only are you a troll, but a foul-mouthed troll. Also, you didn’t even ping the FReepers you trashed.
18
posted on
08/08/2010 12:38:58 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson)
To: rabscuttle385; gogeo; JApost; paulycy; darkangel82; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; mkjessup
19
posted on
08/08/2010 12:41:01 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson)
To: rabscuttle385; Admin Moderator; gogeo; JApost; stephenjohnbanker; Jim Robinson; All
Doesn't really matter, does it?
So basically you're picking a fight for no reason at all. I called JAPost (signup date Jan. 20, 2009) a newbie, and JAPost is, relative to me (signup date Nov. 8, 2006). Yet along you (signup date Jun. 24, 2001) come, telling me out of the blue "KMA, moron."
Is there something you want to confess here, gogeo?
Confession is good for the soul, assuming there is a soul in there. Most trolls don't have one.
Are you in fact JAPost? And, if you are in fact JAPost, are you aware that having multiple FR accounts may potentially be a violation of FR posting guidelines (namely #11, "Don't represent yourself as another person, create or use another screen name to avoid a revocation of posting privileges")?
I think it's time for the mods to compare the IP addresses used by both gogeo and japost to determine IF those two posters are one and the same or not. Rabs? I think you've very likely accomplished a double-whammy in the never-ending game of *WHACK-A-MOLE-TROLL* here on FR.
Or, if you are not in fact JAPost, then your personal attack is wholly uncalled for and unprovoked, not to mention that the FR comment posting utility explicitly discourages personal attacks.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Well let's see if either of those two dirtbags (gogeo or japost) respond, shall we?
20
posted on
08/08/2010 12:47:27 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson