Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Proof in New Black Panther Case: Official (No Evidence Supports Charges by Right-Wingers)
CBS News ^ | 7/25/10 | David S Morgan

Posted on 07/25/2010 10:53:20 AM PDT by Libloather

No Proof in New Black Panther Case: Official
Says No Evidence Supports Charges by Right-Wingers That Obama Admin. Refuses to Prosecute Blacks for Breaking Vote Laws
By David S Morgan
WASHINGTON, July 25, 2010

(CBS) A Bush appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights denounced allegations by some pundits that the Justice Department is refusing to pursue a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because of race, and suggested that the charges being made by right-wing figures are politically motivated.

Conservative broadcasters and websites have claimed that the Obama administration is dropping prosecution of New Black Panther activists who were videotaped outside a Philadelphia polling station on Election Day 2008, making intimidating remarks; one man was carrying a nightstick.

Earlier this month former Justice Department lawyer and Republican activist J. Christian Adams testified to the commission that senior officials in the department are not applying voting rights laws in a race-neutral way, by refusing to press charges against African Americans on these issues.

A recent Media Matters investigation has debunked charges that the Obama administration withdrew criminal charges against the Panthers (in fact, the Bush administration decided not to pursue criminal charges, with Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez testifying that the Bush Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes"; a civil lawsuit was filed in the last days of the Bush administration, and a judgment won by the Obama Justice Department in May 2009).

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: black; elections; evidence; mediamatterslies; nbpp; obama; panther; panthers; proof; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last
To: Libloather

Wow... just wow.

All these people need to be purged.


81 posted on 07/25/2010 2:03:40 PM PDT by hattend (Like a termite to wood, Obama only wants to destroy - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

OMG. If that isn’t evidence of intimidation, then what is? Can we white folks now bring billy clubs too?

What we ought to do is stage a fake voter intimidation that looks exactly the same and see what they do.


82 posted on 07/25/2010 2:04:19 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

I’ll be wearing a Gadsen Flag t-shirt to the polls. Let’s see what happens.


83 posted on 07/25/2010 2:05:19 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Here’s an excellent piece ripping Abigail.

The Case Against the New Black Panthers (McCarthy rips “conservatve” Abigail Thernstrom & DOJ)

Yes, Andrew McCarthy ripped this dingbat a new one in that article.

What’s even more outrageous about Eric Holder’s Dept. of Injustice passing over the voter intimidation in this case is how brazen they are about it.

If they want to O.K. headknocking, they may not be too pleased with the way it turns out.


84 posted on 07/25/2010 2:05:48 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

If they are going to call Adams a “Republican activist” then they should have the honesty to call Media Matters a “Democrat smear group”. Heh, who am I kidding?


85 posted on 07/25/2010 2:13:30 PM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
I’ll be wearing a Gadsen Flag t-shirt to the polls. Let’s see what happens.

Please have your next of kin keep the video recorder rolling and post a link to FR. After your beat down, keep up the fight by repeatedly saying "I can't feel my legs, I can't feel my legs".

86 posted on 07/25/2010 2:13:44 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
So, the Justice Department is correct in that there is NO EVIDENCE they physically restrained anyone to keep them from voting.

Read the evidence and testimony again. The tall "panther" actually stood blocking the doorway from one voter. This testimony was entered into evidence.

87 posted on 07/25/2010 2:15:27 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus; dgkb
“No Evidence”??? Video of thugs with clubs threatening voters is “no evidence”?? I think Abigail has some jungle fever.

The reason she doesn't know about it is because she only watches ABCCBSNBCCNN and reads the N.Y.T.

88 posted on 07/25/2010 2:26:25 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I say send bikers.
89 posted on 07/25/2010 2:33:42 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
If this Admin wants a civil war they are gonna have their wish come true sooner than they may desire.
90 posted on 07/25/2010 2:37:52 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“...in fact, the Bush administration decided not to pursue criminal charges, with Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez testifying that the Bush Justice Department “determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes”;...”

So gear up next election in combat boots, military like uniforms, carry your nightstick, and stand in front of the entrance to the voting precinct. Tell the voters that whites are gonna win this election, and we are back in control now. Since it has been determined to do so does not violate any criminal statutes. The Bush JD says so.


91 posted on 07/25/2010 2:42:35 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (Freedom Watch: fight for freedom with everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #92 Removed by Moderator

To: cantfindagoodscreenname
Am I missing something? Isn’t the article saying that there’s no evidence that the Obama administration tried to stop an investigation? Everyone here seems to think that the article says there’s no evidence that the New Black Panthers tried to intimidate voters.

The thing is, the DoJ attorneys had already won a default judgment in the case when their superiors dropped it.

93 posted on 07/25/2010 2:57:31 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“A recent Media Matters investigation has debunked charges”

ROFLOL!!!

******

From 1995 until 1998, Perez served as Special Counsel to Senator Edward Kennedy, and was Senator Kennedy’s principal adviser on civil rights, criminal justice and constitutional issues.

For the final two years of the Clinton administration, Perez served as the Director of the Office for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Health and Human Services.

Perez also served on the board of Casa de Maryland, a group that advocates for the Latino community in Maryland.


94 posted on 07/25/2010 2:59:08 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The Case Against Abigail Thernstrom: Andrew McCarthy exposes and destroys Abigail's new revisionist story.
95 posted on 07/25/2010 3:25:47 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (Obama is a man-caused disaster..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
Does it matter?

Not to me, but apparently it does to the DOJ.

If you are of a certain race, and you pick on another certain race, the DOJ has been instructed NOT TO INVESTIGATE, nor ACCEPT ANY EVIDENCE.

Example: The BLACK PANTHER CASE.

The 'evidence' is there and the Justice Department has refused to acknowledge it.

Gerald Walpin (fired by Obama for blowing the whistle on a BBALL player who is a 'friend' of Michelle) thinks it has to to with racism.

J. Christian Adams (Asst Atty. General who resigned over the Black Panther case) thinks it has to do with racism.

J.Christian Adams: Former Justice Department lawyer J. Christian Adams made explosive allegations yesterday in testimony to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, saying that a particular Justice Department official openly announced that civil rights laws would not be enforced to protect white voters. He also said he saw race-based harassment within the department itself.

96 posted on 07/25/2010 3:26:18 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
This testimony was entered into evidence.

AND YET, that evidence has been THROWN OUT OF COURT, along WITH THE CASE.

Am I correct?

97 posted on 07/25/2010 3:29:41 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
AND YET, that evidence has been THROWN OUT OF COURT, along WITH THE CASE. Am I correct?

You are correct. The case was already won BEFORE it was dropped.

98 posted on 07/25/2010 3:32:48 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

NOW I understand why Shabbaz had a BILLY CLUB.

If I looked like him, and was such a skinny little pussy, I’d carry a BILLY CLUB too.

Otherwise the little 12 year olds might beat him up.


99 posted on 07/25/2010 3:35:20 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ProfoundMan
Or conversely, would it then be OK for me to stand in front of a polling place with military garb and a nightstick?

I believe it is Dr. Malik Zulu Shabbazz who is prohibited from carrying a nightstick to a Philadelphia polling place until 2011.

So you pays your money and takes your choice.

100 posted on 07/25/2010 3:43:22 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson