Posted on 07/21/2010 3:28:32 PM PDT by dynachrome
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.wnd.com ...
Late. sorry ‘bout that.
Borders, language, culture! Show started with Sherrod and Breitbart’s judgement. Savage thinks the whole thing might have been a sort of “set-up”. The jury’s still out here.
From what I have seen, I believe Sherrod has more baggage in the closet. I hope Breitbart is sandbagging the libs again.
Late with the ping, and I might be going out to dinner later. A busy life this week.
Original Savage topic: Borders!
Though Savage is not going to condemn Breitbart, et al as Medved did Savage sounds like he doesn't get what Breitbart was doing.
The full tape is now everywhere on the web. How come Breitbart couldn't find the full version like so many others have managed to do?
I do not believe that Breitbart tried to frame Ms Sherrod or was tricked into appearing to do so.
Breitbart was illustrating the reaction of the NAACP audience to her racist remarks.
That was the purpose of the release. A bonus would have been to have included how Ms Sherrod saw the error of her racist ways and converted to a classist, rich-v.-poor bigot.
BTW, with the prospect of three hours of "best of" stories I'll be over at Groucho's house. Levin is emphasizing Ms Sherrod's hateful comments against the rich and the Republicans ("running dogs of wacky right wingers").. both of which are cheered by the audience just as much as her earlier racist comments were cheered. The state controlled media (SCAM) will edit those comments out as they condemn Breitbart for his "edited" version.
BTW.. I'm beginning to think that maybe Savage is looking to smear Breitbart just a bit by suggesting he's too dumb to see that he was being used.
As william points out elsewhere, the story was about the NAACP audience’s reaction, it laughing and amen-ing, when she said she had not done all that she could have done, and led the white farmer to his own people.
William, if you reading this, try calling in and tell us if the screener hangs up on you? ;)
Another talker was told right away by a caller and had this to say. The audience reaction was just a "natural human" reaction seeing some arrogant guy getting his comeuppance. That's conservative Dr. William Bennett, PhD who back in the 1990s along with Jack Kemp and Jeb Bush condemned me and the other 60 percent of California voters who voted for Prop 187.
They called us racist and bigots who ruined the Republican chances of being elected. The California Republicans became wannabe Democrats -- IMO the Party is controlled by Democrat moles -- and have won maybe three or four statewide elections since 1994.
Brain dead caller
Fake caller?
Fake voice caller.
ah, the next caller called it like I thought — it sounded like a man trying to sound like a woman. I swear, I may be right about the screening procedures. It’s show biz.
Yeah, took me a minute. I think some guy faking a female voice.
Beowulf?
haha.
hey, we’re all on the same wavelength today.
Oh, and on that thread many of you were on yesterday, charging Savage as being VICIOUS.
Michael Savage’s VICIOUS Attack On Glenn Beck Over ‘Going Blind’ Revelation: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2555941/posts
I think it was a set-up by Beck supporters, in the manner that the Statist loving FReeper moles start-up anticonservative threads.
SJB knows the kind of BS I’m talking about.
The pro-Fioriana, anti-Devore mobies did this in May until we got wise and they became more subtle.
On this “Vicious” thread, the body of the post was a vanity disguised as a Youtube intro.
The Youtube itself was posted by “TheDailyBeck” and was essentially a boast that Beck had edged Savage out of #3 for the first time. And the headline was hype, because there was nothing vicious — insensitive at most, and that would be true if Beck had not been clowning about his own condition anyway (something I proved in my comments).
Within in minutes of the posting, the first 10 comments were all me-toos to the headline and the verdict on Savage.
NONE of them could have run the Youtube and then posted, because the youtube was just under 5 minutes long.
And none of them responded to this comment I left that I pinged them to: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2555941/posts?page=193#193
Yeah, that sounds like Bennett. I Think I told you before that I believe that there is not one reliable talkshow host on the Salem stable.
Also, I think we could all suffer from whiplash from all the ways this Sherrod issue could ping-pong.
Whoa. At 44 minutes of the second hour, a caller got in your point william. He snuck it in!
And Savage downplayed it.
Damn!
Doc makes an interesting point that the old white farmers were found real quick.
tinfoil hat time?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.