Skip to comments.
Digs in Conn. neighborhood find artifacts of 1637 battle
AP via Columbus Dispatch ^
| July 12, 2010
| Stephanie Reitz
Posted on 07/13/2010 11:17:16 AM PDT by Pharmboy
MYSTIC, Conn. - Artifacts of a battle between an American Indian tribe and English settlers, a confrontation that helped shape early American history, have sat for years beneath manicured lawns and children's swing sets in a Connecticut neighborhood.
A project to map the battlefields of the Pequot War is bringing those musket balls, gunflints and arrowheads into the sunlight for the first time in centuries. It's also giving researchers insight into the combatants and the land on which they fought, particularly the Mystic hilltop where at least 400 Pequot Indians died in a 1637 massacre by English settlers.
Historians say the attack was a turning point in English warfare with native tribes. It nearly wiped out the powerful Pequots and showed other tribes that the colonists wouldn't hesitate to use methods that some consider genocide. snip..
The researchers have already found remnants of English metal uniform buttons, bandoliers and other items that might help mark where settlers marched, camped before the attack and retreated afterward. The artifacts are being cataloged at the museum and will be kept and displayed there.
(Excerpt) Read more at dispatch.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; US: Connecticut; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: indianwars; mystic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
They do not mention it here, but those early wars were pretty bloody on both sides. Reading just this, one might get the feeling that it was just the colonists who resorted to brutish techniques.
1
posted on
07/13/2010 11:17:20 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
07/13/2010 11:19:13 AM PDT
by
JennysCool
(My hypocrisy goes only so far)
To: Pharmboy
Historians say the attack was a turning point in English warfare with native tribes. It nearly wiped out the powerful Pequots and showed other tribes that the colonists wouldn't hesitate to use methods that some consider genocide.That's a revisionist "historian" way of putting it.
Or perhaps this was simply a battle fought in a time when men were men and sought to destroy their enemies, lest they come back seeking vengeance.
3
posted on
07/13/2010 11:24:56 AM PDT
by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: Pharmboy
cool find though...I’ll be interested to see what all they uncover as time goes on.
4
posted on
07/13/2010 11:25:46 AM PDT
by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: Pharmboy
Never bring a bow and arrows to a musket fight.....!!
Militant
5
posted on
07/13/2010 11:26:00 AM PDT
by
militant2
(I may not agree with everything you say, but......hell, I don't agree with anything you say!)
To: SunkenCiv; indcons; Chani; thefactor; blam; aculeus; ELS; Doctor Raoul; mainepatsfan; timpad; ...

The Pequot Indians, once a powerful tribe, controlled all of Connecticut east of the Connecticut River. The tribe numbered 2,500, and its name meant "Destroyer." After they were defeated by colonists in the Pequot War of 1637, the Pequots' influence diminished significantly, and many of them were sold into slavery. In 1655, some Pequots were released and resettled onto a strip of land near New Haven. Although he tribe gradually dispersed, those that remained in Connecticut were forced to share their land with great numbers of English settlers. By 1735, the colonists had encroached so severely on the Indians' land, cutting down their timber and stealing their crops, that the Pequots petitioned Governor Joseph Talcott for help. None was forthcoming, and the Pequot population continued to dwindle, so that by 1850 the number of full- blooded Pequot Indians was down to forty. The above graphic and copy from
here. Thanks to the Free Republic's resident scholar SunkenCiv for alerting me to this story...
The RevWar/Colonial History/General Washington ping list...
6
posted on
07/13/2010 11:26:33 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
To: Pharmboy
The English are great warriors.
To: Zeppelin
Or perhaps this was simply a battle fought in a time when men were men and sought to destroy their enemies, lest they come back seeking vengeance. That's EXACTLY right.
8
posted on
07/13/2010 11:35:45 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
I'd like to revise my statement...
Or perhaps this was simply a battle fought in a time when men were men (despite the wigs) and sought to destroy their enemies, lest they come back seeking vengeance.
9
posted on
07/13/2010 11:39:56 AM PDT
by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: Pharmboy
I wonder, what part of “WAR” does this writer not understand?.......................
10
posted on
07/13/2010 11:39:58 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
To: Pharmboy
Imagine a Connecticut Yankee in Sachem Sassacus’ Court trying to explain Foxwoods.
11
posted on
07/13/2010 11:40:24 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("Obama suffers from decision-deficit disorder." Oliver North 6/25/10)
To: NonValueAdded
Ya think, even though Johnny Mathis will be appearing there later in July?
12
posted on
07/13/2010 11:46:16 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
To: Pharmboy
The Pequot War convinced several colonies to band together for mutual protection from the French and Indians. They formed The New England Confederation. It lasted about 40 years. During the English Civil Wars, the colonies were on their own; no help came from the mother country. French foreign policy was one of containment of the prosperous English in North America. It is why after 150 years, the colonies were still huddled along the Atlantic seaboard.
The confederation was something of a precursor to the colonies’ response to another threat in the mid 1770s.
13
posted on
07/13/2010 12:03:14 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Tyrants should fear for their personal safety.)
To: Pharmboy
Thanks for the link Pharmboy. I’m really interested in Colonial Wars.
“A project to map the battlefields of the Pequot War is bringing those musket balls, gunflints and arrowheads into the sunlight for the first time in centuries. It’s also giving researchers insight into the combatants and the land on which they fought, particularly the Mystic hilltop where at least 400 Pequot Indians died in a 1637 massacre by English settlers.”
I read somewhere that the English Colonists at this time and through King Philip’s War in the 1660’s, used matchlock muskets and the Indians used flintlocks. The settlers had less use for firearms than the Native Americans who valued them as a tool to obtain furs and hides for trade with the Europeans, and, as such, purchased the more effective weapon at the time.
The War was supposedly started by the murder of a questionable character, John Stone, a privateer or pirate, and slaver, by the Western Niantics
“In the same year, John Stone was murdered by the Pequots on the Connecticut River. It may be that he was thought to be a Dutchman, and one of the murderers of Tatobem. Stone was known to the Bay Colony authorities as a privateer and rogue and may have provoked the Indians who claim to have acted in self-defense, but he soon became another statistic in the Colony’s list of Pequot “crimes.”
http://www.dowdgen.com/dowd/document/pequots.html
14
posted on
07/13/2010 12:17:28 PM PDT
by
ZULU
To: Pharmboy; SunkenCiv
And today they have the largest resort casino in the world . . . .
To: Pharmboy
I always thought
King Philip's war was the first war between the Indians and the Colonists. I'm glad to learn about this one.
16
posted on
07/13/2010 12:58:25 PM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
To: Red Badger
Considering that Indians tortured each other to death during wars, the Brits were pretty easy on them
17
posted on
07/13/2010 1:00:33 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Pharmboy
To: AppyPappy
I once read or heard that each tribe’s name for itself translated “human being” and that other tribes were considered as animals, ergo, they could be killed at will..........
19
posted on
07/13/2010 1:16:28 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
To: Jacquerie
I never knew that...thanks for that insight. One of those that’s so spot on yet so obvious when one thinks about it.
20
posted on
07/13/2010 1:41:06 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson