Should the U.S. Adopt Compulsory Voting?
__________________________
Nope. But we should return to the Constitution when it allowed only land-owners to vote.
“But we should return to the Constitution when it allowed only land-owners to vote.”
That’s exactly what’s needed, only people who have a real stake should vote, not those who just want to vote for benefits to themselves from the pockets of others.
http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/spring07/elections.cfm
Property requirements were widespread. Some colonies required a voter to own a certain amount of land or land of a specified value. Others required personal property of a certain value, or payment of a certain amount of taxes. Examples from 1763 show the variety of these requirements. Delaware expected voters to own fifty acres of land or property worth £40. Rhode Island set the limit at land valued at £40 or worth an annual rent of £2. Connecticut required land worth an annual rent of £2 or livestock worth £40.
Ben Franklin lampooned these requirements for property ownership thusly....
“Today a man owns a jackass worth 50 dollars and he is entitled to vote; but before the next election the jackass dies. The man in the mean time has become more experienced, his knowledge of the principles of government, and his acquaintance with mankind, are more extensive, and he is therefore better qualified to make a proper selection of rulersbut the jackass is dead and the man cannot vote. Now gentlemen, pray inform me, in whom is the right of suffrage? In the man or in the jackass?”
Now we all know plenty of jackasses out there voting! But really? ;)
Then only government could vote. Stop paying your taxes and see if you really own your land.