Skip to comments.
Wed. House Hearing For Amnesty Shows Tin Ear To Needs Of The Jobless
NumbersUSA.com ^
| July 12, 2010
| Roy Beck
Posted on 07/12/2010 4:58:18 PM PDT by Man50D
Democratic Leaders of the House Judiciary Committee plan a hearing for Wednesday to examine the "ethical imperative" of granting an amnesty and increasing the number of legal U.S. workers by millions.
We will hope that other Democrats on the committee, as well as the Republicans, will talk about the ethical imperative of putting unemployed Americans back to work.
The hearing is a sign that Congress is far more interested in politics than in the needs of the country.
Why? Well, Democratic Leaders are telling reporters that they hope to use the hearing as a way to put Republicans on the defensive for blocking "comprehensive immigration reform."
Wouldn't it be nice if these particular Democratic Leaders would actually hold a hearing to decide what immigration policy would be best for unemployed American workers? NumbersUSA has been calling for such a hearing for almost two years now.
An ethical immigration policy would stop most immigration until the U-6 unemployment rate came down to at least 9% (currently, it is almost 17%).
It is time for Americans everywhere to speak up for themselves and their unemployed relatives, neighbors and friends. It is time that Americans contact Members of the Judiciary Committee and ask them to pass an ethical bill that would suspend all immigration of foreign workers through Chain, Lottery and unskilled worker categories and to greatly reduce the immigration of the lesser skilled immigration categories.
(Excerpt) Read more at numbersusa.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; aliens; amnesty; brakingnews; democrats; economy; liberalfascism; noamnestyforillegals; obama; unemployment
Illegal aliens are also a threat to our national security! Capitol switchboard toll free numbers are 877-762-8762, 877-851-6437, 877-210-5351, 866-338-1015, 866-220-0044.
Call tomorrow and pour it on!
1
posted on
07/12/2010 4:58:20 PM PDT
by
Man50D
To: Man50D
They are also breaking the law. It’s like if someone came to your house and lived there.
2
posted on
07/12/2010 5:03:00 PM PDT
by
Ptarmigan
(Remember The Great Ptarmigan/Rabbit War!)
To: Man50D
We’re going to have an “ethical imperative” to destroy each lib that votes for this...them, their houses, their wealth...everything.
And we sound insure that NO spawn of a politician is allowed to major in the typical small mind college majors: poli sci, law, sociology, any “studies”, etc. Requiring them to take intellectual subjects will almost totally reduce any chance of them getting a degree.
3
posted on
07/12/2010 5:03:19 PM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: Man50D
An ethical immigration policy would stop most immigration until the U-6 unemployment rate came down to at least 9% (currently, it is almost 17%) An ethical immigration policy for 9% and above U-6 is self-deportation. How about that? Now, congresscritters, encourage it!
4
posted on
07/12/2010 5:18:18 PM PDT
by
C210N
(0bama, Making the world safe for Marxism)
To: Man50D
All you FReepers in LA, FL, TX, and MS - start collecting the tar. I have some feather pillows that I would be willing to sacrifice.
5
posted on
07/12/2010 5:27:04 PM PDT
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Roy Beck: Democratic Leaders of the House Judiciary Committee plan a hearing for Wednesday to examine the "ethical imperative" of granting an amnesty and increasing the number of legal U.S. workers by millions. We will hope that other Democrats on the committee, as well as the Republicans, will talk about the ethical imperative of putting unemployed Americans back to work... Democratic Leaders are telling reporters that they hope to use the hearing as a way to put Republicans on the defensive for blocking "comprehensive immigration reform." Wouldn't it be nice if these particular Democratic Leaders would actually hold a hearing to decide what immigration policy would be best for unemployed American workers? ...An ethical immigration policy would stop most immigration until the U-6 unemployment rate came down to at least 9% (currently, it is almost 17%).
Thanks Man50D.
6
posted on
07/12/2010 5:34:18 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: Man50D
Jobless people are only necessary until they can be employed to count votes. Once the votes are counted in favor of the oligarchy, they are to be discarded. Possibly destroyed. Definitely ignored.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
7
posted on
07/12/2010 5:53:37 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: Man50D
We will hope that other Democrats on the committee, as well as the Republicans, will talk about the ethical imperative of putting unemployed Americans back to work.
Huh? By legalizing 30+ million invaders, we are going to put Americans back to work? What are these RATS smoking?
8
posted on
07/12/2010 6:23:18 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Man50D
I think Congress knows our feelings on this.
They’re going to do it anyway.
9
posted on
07/12/2010 6:30:12 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Da Coyote
Were going to have an ethical imperative to destroy each lib that votes for this...them, their houses, their wealth...everything. And we sound insure that NO spawn of a politician is allowed to major in the typical small mind college majors: poli sci, law, sociology, any studies, etc. Requiring them to take intellectual subjects will almost totally reduce any chance of them getting a degree. Brilliant post. Communists, all...
10
posted on
07/12/2010 6:31:16 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Tzimisce
What are these RATS smoking?
Socialism.
11
posted on
07/12/2010 7:02:00 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Tzimisce; Cheerio
Sorry about the misspost. It was meant for Cheerio
What are these RATS smoking?
Socialism.
12
posted on
07/12/2010 7:04:45 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Cheerio
>>We will hope that other Democrats on the committee, as well as the Republicans, will talk about the ethical imperative of putting unemployed Americans back to work.
>
>Huh? By legalizing 30+ million invaders, we are going to put Americans back to work?
Because then they WILL be American citizens. And in twisted way, should amnesty pass, all the currently “undocumented” jobs become legal... they can then claim that they ‘created’ all those jobs and gave them to ‘Americans.’
[/cynic]
13
posted on
07/12/2010 8:04:23 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: OneWingedShark
I don't believe by EO can make these 30+ million be “citizens” - he may be able to issue an EO giving them amnesty for breaking the law - doesn't make them citizens and in AZ they still have to be “legal” to take a job. The employer stands to loose his business license if he knowingly hires someone illegally in the country - so what would the newly amnestized person offer up as his ID? He won't have a green card, he won't have a SS card (unless he is committing fraud which hasn't been forgiven). I just don't get what boy king thinks he will accomplish with this other than to make everyone angrier than ever.
14
posted on
07/12/2010 9:35:02 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Cheerio
GREAT OPed in WSJ tonight ------
Obama's Immigration Fakery In 2007, then-Sen. Obama helped derail an immigration bill he claimed to support. He's no more serious about a bipartisan bill today. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704288204575363050008644766.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
15
posted on
07/12/2010 10:27:43 PM PDT
by
W-Girl
To: OneWingedShark
This is the same group that believes you have to spend your way out of debt.
To: Cheerio
Who said anything about Executive Order?
Isn’t this thread talking about one of the houses of the Congress?
17
posted on
07/13/2010 6:16:46 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Boardwalk
Perhaps if you were talking about denominations of .50, .45, .38, .357, .22, and so forth...
The debt being saddled on the younger generation is criminal... I wouldn’t condemn them for saying a big “F—ck you” and violently resisting the Government’s demand that they pay/are-responsible-for it. {Any I’m not just saying that because I’m in my late twenties.}
18
posted on
07/13/2010 6:32:44 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: OneWingedShark
19
posted on
07/13/2010 7:52:38 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
20
posted on
07/14/2010 11:16:50 AM PDT
by
HiJinx
(I can see November from my front porch - and Mexico from the back.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson