Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA Opposed To Kagan Nomination To U.S. Supreme Court {With Warning to Senators!}
nraila.org ^ | 7/12/10 | LaPierre & Cox

Posted on 07/12/2010 9:35:19 AM PDT by drpix

There may be no vote a United States Senator casts that is more important than a vote to confirm a nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now that the Court has clearly stated that the Second Amendment is a fundamental, individual right that applies to all law-abiding Americans, NRA members and gun owners expect a nominee to the Court to fully support, defend and preserve that freedom.

- -clip - -

She should not serve on any court, let alone be confirmed to a lifetime seat on the highest court in the land.

The NRA is strongly opposed to the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court. This vote matters and will be a part of future candidate evaluations.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guns; kagan; kagantruthfile; nra; reid; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Has the NRA seen the light?

Is this a shot across Harry Reid's bow?

If so, can he postpone the vote to after the election?

1 posted on 07/12/2010 9:35:24 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drpix
This thread has just added to the FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".

Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it. Just a suggestion.

Let Freedom Ring,

Gun Facts v5.1!

Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v5.1 download page!

2 posted on 07/12/2010 9:36:56 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Think that will matter? But this could explain why the NRA was hinting at backing Reid.


3 posted on 07/12/2010 9:38:33 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Pennsyvalia Senators . . . You listening? Michigan? Wisconsin?


4 posted on 07/12/2010 9:38:56 AM PDT by Mere Survival (The time to fight was yesterday but now will have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix
I suspect that the NRA has been getting a lot of mail. Keep it up, just like the RNC, NRA needs our money.

Keep them all worried and working, for us!

5 posted on 07/12/2010 9:39:17 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

How about little Markie Pryor? How many times must I see this asshat donning his camo for campaign ads and then vote for Marxist judges?


6 posted on 07/12/2010 9:42:01 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Hmm... Support Reids reelection in exchange for Reid not voting on Kagan?

I wouldn’t trust Reid as far as I can throw him. And knowing Reid,he will kill Kagan’s nomination, get reelected then support someone even further to the left.

Nope...


7 posted on 07/12/2010 9:42:16 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Helter Skelter. The Revolution is Upon Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
I like this. Our side should ask the same question we get from pro-abortionists.

“Do you respect the law of the land and the precedents of Chicago?” (Chicago substituted for Roe v Wade)

Her answer: “i’m not familiar with that case. or natural rights. or American Exceptionalism. or freedom.”

8 posted on 07/12/2010 9:43:51 AM PDT by dockkiller (COME AND TAKE IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Didn’t some people here recently claim to have inside knowledge that the NRA would support her?


9 posted on 07/12/2010 9:44:11 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mere Survival
You listening? Michigan?

Ha! As if Senators Levin and Stabenow give a damn.

10 posted on 07/12/2010 9:44:12 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Didn’t some people here recently claim to have inside knowledge that the NRA would support her?

I believe that was NRA support for Reid.

11 posted on 07/12/2010 9:44:58 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I saw those. They were claims the NRA was ‘hinting’ at supporting him, I can’t find where they actually did. Sounded more like they were attempting to manipulate Reid.


12 posted on 07/12/2010 9:46:38 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Like the NRA is even relevant anymore, what a joke!


13 posted on 07/12/2010 9:48:32 AM PDT by orchestra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix
"If so, can he postpone the vote to after the election? "

That is a good question. The powers of the Speaker to bring (or not to bring) things to a vote on the floor are without limit. I'm not sure about those same powers in the Senate that are wielded by the Leader.

I think (and this is only a guess), that is it possibly for Reid, or any Leader, to not have a confirmation vote on the floor, even though the nominee has successfully navigated the Committee vote.

14 posted on 07/12/2010 9:49:40 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

We shouldn’t endorse anyonewithout some assurances of their future behavior. One step forward and two steps back is a net loss every time.


15 posted on 07/12/2010 9:51:32 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mere Survival
"Pennsyvalia Senators . . . You listening? Michigan? Wisconsin?"

Virginia - here are two Senators, Webb and Warner, who I believe both enjoy positive NRA ratings.

If the NRA has ANY pull, Kagan should be toast. I'm not going to hold my breath.

16 posted on 07/12/2010 9:53:43 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2482268/posts
17 posted on 07/12/2010 9:55:07 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
I'm sure you are right about the nasty membership mail suspicion.

I tried to resign my NRA membership after they threw in with Schumer on his the First Amendment assault (and the hand-holding with the creepy villain Reid confirms my exit decision); however they (the NRA) told me that I had to resign in writing.

That's a pain, so I'll just let my NRA membership lapse; and, I believe that thousands of members, just like me, will not be re-enlisting no matter how many tacks to the right (e.g. opposition to Kagan nomination) the NRA wants us to notice that it takes.

And membership out-migration is an even bigger statement than a letter.

.

18 posted on 07/12/2010 9:57:04 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drpix

The cynic in me sees it this way: The NRA will oppose Kagan — who everyone knows will be confirmed anyway. Then the NRA will endorse Reid who may not necessarily win reelection, but the NRA endorsement would certainly help.

So the question is what NRA action has more value? The opposition to Kagan — a sure bet nomination anyway? Or Reid, who is in a political dog fight?


19 posted on 07/12/2010 9:57:19 AM PDT by Obadiah (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

I don’t know why the NRA is playing both sides of the fence with their signature issue. Are Dims depositing gobs of money into the NRA coffers? Or does the NRA like the gun issue to be more controversial and to keep gun owners on edge because, like it or not, this uncertainly dramatically increases gun sales and attention for the NRA.
Support Reid while opposing Kagan; that’s completely schizophrenic.


20 posted on 07/12/2010 9:59:54 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson