[vladimir998]

You wrote:

“Quoting only half of the definition (which is an either/or one) is a really interesting form of dishonesty.”

I said “So, your definition is down by 50% already”, dumbass. Did you not see that? Either you saw it and are now going to lie about it (I noticed you made no mention of that entire point!) or you’re just a moron.

You wrote:

“Clearly the two cuffing Grant were surprised that anything at all happened.”

Not according to their testimony. They were surprised that there was a gunshot. They were not surprised that the officer wanted to use his taser.

[Filo]

I said “So, your definition is down by 50% already”,

And as I said it's an or definition. It has to be A or B so, by definition, it's down by 50%.

Don't let your functional illiteracy be my fault.

Not according to their testimony. They were surprised that there was a gunshot. They were not surprised that the officer wanted to use his taser.

Q:How can you tell a cop is lying?
A:He's on the witness stand.

If the cops expected a taser they would have gotten out of the way.