[Filo]

I said “So, your definition is down by 50% already”,

And as I said it's an or definition. It has to be A or B so, by definition, it's down by 50%.

Don't let your functional illiteracy be my fault.

Not according to their testimony. They were surprised that there was a gunshot. They were not surprised that the officer wanted to use his taser.

Q:How can you tell a cop is lying?
A:He's on the witness stand.

If the cops expected a taser they would have gotten out of the way.

[vladimir998]

You wrote:

“And as I said it’s an or definition. It has to be A or B so, by definition, it’s down by 50%.”

And that’s what I said. Wat part of this are you missing?

“Don’t let your functional illiteracy be my fault.”

I’m clearly NOT the one who is illiterate around here.

“Q:How can you tell a cop is lying?
A:He’s on the witness stand.”

Q: How can you tell when someone is bigoted against the police?
A: When he assumes that all cops lie on the witness stand - especially when other witnesses and video actually back-up their testimony and a jury agrees with them.

“If the cops expected a taser they would have gotten out of the way.”

Not necesarily when holding a man down.