Posted on 07/08/2010 9:30:08 AM PDT by MissesBush
(Reuters) - Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer's edge over Republican challenger Carly Fiorina has dwindled to 3 points as she seeks re-election in November, with more Californians now holding an unfavorable view of the three-term senator, a poll released on Thursday showed.
Boxer, who once held a 30-point lead over Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett Packard and a political novice, is now ahead by a margin of only 47 percent to 44 percent, the Field Poll found.
One of President Barack Obama's staunchest allies who has become a powerful liberal voice in the Senate since she was first elected in 1992, Boxer is facing her toughest challenge yet, as a wave of anti-incumbent sentiment sweeps the nation.
California, normally a reliably Democratic state suffering from double-digit unemployment and a budget deficit running into tens of billions of dollars, is considered a potential bellwether in the coming congressional elections.
The Field Poll found that since January more Californians have become disgruntled with Boxer, with 52 percent of likely voters holding an unfavorable view of her, compared with just 41 percent who regard her favorably.
Boxer's ratings have dropped to some of the lowest levels of her 18-year career in the Senate, with only 42 percent of registered voters approving of her job performance and 43 percent disapproving.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
At least you fessed up to it, your so called friends probably still think you're right.......
No.
LOL...
My friends have been kind. They probably knew I was wrong, but didn’t rub it in. They know me, and that I will take care of my own problem when I make a mistake.
I am honest. If I say something, it’s because I believe it. If I am shown to be wrong, I’ll agree and take my lumps.
Do you realize how rare that is here. Not to pat myself on the back, but in the twelve years I’ve been contributing here, I haven’t had five people come clean with me. We all make mistakes. It’s the honest well-meaning folks who admit to them.
Have I had one person who supports McCain come to me and say, I didn’t realize how bad he was until I read the things you documented? Not one. Have I had one person come to me and say I liked Palin, Fiorina, and Whitman a lot more before I read what type of person they were willing to support? Not one.
The folks on my side may not always get it, but at least they’re open and honest about what they do run across. That list of mine does disturb them. It does disturb them that people could sign on to support a man like that.
That’s open, curious, and honest. It would be nice to see a glimmer of that from folks who profess to be open and honest and righteous here, when trashing folks like us for addressing reality.
Thank you for reading the post and responding. I appreciate it.
D.O., I realize my brief answer was abrupt. But I did feel that you were missing my point in your vehemence about your point. No harm, no foul. But please reconsider what I was saying — at certain times, in certain races, we need to reluctantly conclude that buying a little time by voting for a naive, misguided and vulnerable candidate is better than either a) abstaining or b) voting for an evil candidate who is also fully entrenched and connected.
People often say that our votes for Perot helped Clinton gain the White House; and in hindsight, I agree. The timing was wrong. But the situation on the ground now is approximately 100 times more dire. We simply can’t afford to throw the next election to the Democrats out of ideological purity.
Has there ever been an election in your lifetime where you didn’t think the nation depended on the outcome so much, that you thought backing disgusting people on our side wasn’t necessary?
Look where that ideology, no matter how logical, has gotten us.
Now all we get are leftists, on BOTH sides.
Until a group of people stand up and state emphatically, I will only support people with wholesome ideals, we will never get them.
We are defeating ourselves, because they know we’ll settle.
I’m not saying this in anger. I honestly understand where you are coming from. At some point, we either take a stand or we watch this nation destroyed with our help.
Isn’t that the only conclusion of electing either an Obama OR a McCain to office? In your heart, you know damn well it is.
BTW: I knew the response was short and what that probably meant. No problem. Later...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.