Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leslie Van Houten, a Charles Manson follower, hopes for parole in 19th try at age 60
AP ^ | 7/5/10 | Staff

Posted on 07/06/2010 7:19:15 AM PDT by MissTed

Leslie Van Houten, the one-time Charles Manson follower long seen as the most likely of his ex-acolytes to win freedom someday, faces her 19th parole hearing on Tuesday with a new lawyer and new case law which may give her the best chance yet for release.

Even if there is a finding of suitability for parole at the hearing, freedom would not be immediate. The entire state parole board would review the decision within 120 days and it would then be submitted to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for a final ruling.

Van Houten, 60, remains incarcerated at the California Institution for Women at Frontera, the same prison where another Manson follower, Patricia Krenwinkle, is imprisoned. Susan Atkins, the third woman convicted of murder in the crimes directed by cult leader Manson, died in prison last year after parole officials denied her dying request for freedom.

Van Houten last appeared before a parole board in 2007. Her chances for parole are enhanced by the fact that she has been discipline free since her incarceration in the early 1970s, has positive psychological reports and has been active in self-help groups at the prison including "Golden Girls," a group for elderly women inmates.

She has a new lawyer, Brandie Devall, who told The Associated Press she will refer to rulings by the California Supreme Court in 2008 and 2009 affecting standards for parole.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2dangerous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
At this point, I'd say it's up to the family of the La Bianca's.
1 posted on 07/06/2010 7:19:19 AM PDT by MissTed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissTed

rot


2 posted on 07/06/2010 7:24:01 AM PDT by Doogle (IT'S THAT TIME AGAIN....PLEASE donate, because it's the RIGHT thing to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

Sad. All these girls came from broken homes. Doesn’t excuse what they did, but it is still sad.


3 posted on 07/06/2010 7:24:27 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

Ms Van Houten may now be a decent person and would likely be a nonviolent citizen. However since the La Bianca’s are still dead she can rot behind bars for all I care.


4 posted on 07/06/2010 7:26:06 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

agreed


5 posted on 07/06/2010 7:26:42 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

Why does parole even exist for violent criminals?


6 posted on 07/06/2010 7:27:17 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

How about the innocent people she is going to be living next to once she gets out? Do they get a say? The crimes she committed are unforgiveable and she was given the death penalty. In fact this is the exact reason why we have the death penalty because eventually these monsters can be let out of prison.


7 posted on 07/06/2010 7:29:37 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

The only reason she’s still breathing air is because of an activist Supreme Court. If there were actual justice in this country should would have been worm food nearly 40 years ago.


8 posted on 07/06/2010 7:30:58 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/houten1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansondefendants.html&h=219&w=200&sz=34&tbnid=7z-rudyzoI05uM:&tbnh=107&tbnw=98&prev=/images%3Fq%3DLeslie%2BVan%2BHouten&usg=__u1FVsnxQgGWQRdBKN1k9vbo-SVk=&sa=X&ei=rT0zTJiyN4WdlgfL5IG-Cw&ved=0CDoQ9QEwBg

She is the only one of the bunch that was “easy of the eyes.”

But a total psycho.


9 posted on 07/06/2010 7:35:35 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MissTed
I've said it before and I'll say it again: someone who was truly repentant and remorseful over the random thrill killing of several of their fellow human beings would never seek parole.

She would acknowledge a life sentence as a just and deserved punishment for her crimes and she would be resolved to pay the full penalty.

The fact that she thinks she deserves parole tells us something.

The fact that she fought for a new trial just six years after her original sentencing tells us something.

The fact that she was caught in an escape plot in 1981 also tells us something.

She really doesn't think she belongs in prison.

10 posted on 07/06/2010 7:35:54 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

This also total BS!!!!

“Charles “Tex” Watson (Tried Separately)

In August 1969, Watson became the principal killer in the Tate-LaBianca murders. Announcing his arrival at the Tate residence, Watson said, “I am the Devil and I’m here to do the Devil’s business............”

...He married a Norwegian wife and has three children.”

Boy, really a rough life for this guy at the taxpayer’s expense!


11 posted on 07/06/2010 7:42:05 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65
impulsiveness of youth....and for that....a whole life wasted...no marriage, no children, no career, no volunteering for the Red Cross, no grandchildren, no helping their elderly parents.

hate me, but its time to let these women go home to be senior citizens......they were drug crazed cult followers....

12 posted on 07/06/2010 7:43:09 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
This morning, one of our local Palm Springs area TV stations did a phone interview with one of her jurors, who now lives in the Coachella Valley......he thinks she should be paroled, because she didn't really murder Mrs. LaBianca; she only stabbed her multiple times after she was dead.

Sheesh....

13 posted on 07/06/2010 7:44:00 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

Why were all these people not in the Gas Chamber long ago??


14 posted on 07/06/2010 7:47:50 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2; pnh102

One would normally assume that a sentence of “life without parole” would be a viable choice. It’s usually offered to a perp for confessing, sometimes revealing details of where the body is, etc, and also spares the sate the huge expense of a capital trial. Everyone who advocates it forgets that in oder for it to be a viable alternative that a defendant will jump at, there has to be an active death penalty statute, with a reasonable time frame for judgement. In Florida, it works well...and we are also executing the worst..


15 posted on 07/06/2010 7:50:50 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cherry
its time to let these women go home to be senior citizens......they were drug crazed cult followers....

Sorry, but she's a murderer (or murderess). She and the others should have received the death penalty and saved the taxpayers some money.

16 posted on 07/06/2010 7:54:42 AM PDT by Riodacat (Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Did Watson get parole?


17 posted on 07/06/2010 7:57:30 AM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

They have to parole her. Obama will need all the votes he can get in 2012.


18 posted on 07/06/2010 7:58:52 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
It doesn't say he did, but don't California prisons have some kind of “vist” rule?

What's next, time off to appear on Dancing with the Stars?

19 posted on 07/06/2010 8:01:55 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
On the night of August 10, 1969, Manson drove Van Houten, Tex Watson, Patricia Krenwinkel, Susan Atkins, Steve Grogan, and Linda Kasabian to an address in Los Feliz, the home of Rosemary and Leno LaBianca. Manson entered the house with Watson and handed him the ropes around his neck; he then left the house, instructing Krenwinkel and Van Houten to go inside and join Watson. The house had previously been cased in a process they called "creepy-crawling."
Krenwinkel and Van Houten found Rosemary LaBianca in a bedroom, to which she had retired while her husband had fallen asleep while reading in the living room. Van Houten put a pillowcase over Rosemary LaBianca's head, and the two women tied the electrical cord from a lamp around her neck. LaBianca started struggling; meanwhile, her husband, who had been tied up in the living room, started screaming as Watson began stabbing him. Rosemary grabbed the lamp and swung it at Van Houten, who fought with her and knocked the lamp away. Van Houten then held LaBianca down while Krenwinkel tried to stab her in the chest, but the blade bent on LaBianca's clavicle. Van Houten called for assistance from Watson, who entered the bedroom and took charge. Van Houten exited the room and stood in the hallway, staring into an adjacent empty room.
Watson then stabbed Rosemary LaBianca several times, found Van Houten, handed her the knife, and told her to "do something." Van Houten proceeded to stab Rosemary 16 times in the lower torso. The autopsy showed that several of the wounds had been inflicted post-mortem. Van Houten then wiped the premises down for fingerprints, changed into LaBianca's clothes, and took food from the refrigerator before leaving the house.

This bitch (Van Houten) was an active participant in this massacre and there's nothing to suggest she should be shown any compassion or consideration.

20 posted on 07/06/2010 8:02:05 AM PDT by Riodacat (Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson