Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taking The Lord's Name In Vain (NPR)
NPR ^ | 7/2/10 | Alicia Shepard

Posted on 07/02/2010 1:23:58 PM PDT by Drango

Taking the Lord’s name in vain does not go over well in some households, particularly in the South.

In a June 23 story about Tom Cruise’s new action movie, Knight and Day, Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep was discussing the “Superstar” crisis in Hollywood as Cruise ages out of that category.

Tom Cruise, it seems, is no longer ultra-cool.

But that isn’t what lit up the phone lines at NPR member station, PBA in Atlanta, GA.

It was a brief clip of Cruise satirically playing a profane movie mogul at the recent MTV movie awards. Grossman/Cruise used God’s name to amplify his success, much to the dismay of some listeners.

INSKEEP: And you hear the voice of Tom Cruise, but you almost don't see him. He's made up. He's bald. He's wearing glasses. He's got this paunch, this potbelly. And let's listen to a little bit of Tom Cruise in that character, Les Grossman, at the recent "MTV Movie Awards."

(Soundbite of TV show, "MTV Movie Awards") (Soundbite of cheering)

Mr. TOM CRUISE (As Les Grossman): Movies, awards - I've made them, I've won them. And for 35 years, I've done it better and made more [god****] money than anybody in Hollywood. Aside from the money and the power and the money and the power, I do it for only one reason: you.

“This kind of thing definitely plays differently for a number of people in the South where we have been referred to historically as the Bible Belt,” said John Weatherford, PBA’s general manager, who had to deal with the calls and complaints. “So why not just bleep it out. How much time or effort can that take? This was an entertainment piece. What would we have lost by bleeping it out?”

Another listener in Winston-Salem, NC wrote:

“I was shocked to hear a sound clip with strong profanity in the story about Tom Cruise,” said David Shuford. “It would not have hurt you to bleep that out. This was very offensive. Did the producer ever think kids could be in the car hearing that? But that language isn’t even fit for adults.”

This is the second time I’ve written about this issue. Last July, it was about NPR bleeping out some offensive words in a piece about the movie, Hurt Locker, but not bothering to bleep out "god****."

It’s against the law to say some words on air, according to the Federal Communication Commission. But NPR’s legal team says that using the Lord’s name in vain for emphasis is not illegal.

So even if it’s not illegal, does that make it right?

This time, I’m seeing the question through a different lens – one that is not based in the New York-Washington corridor, where this example of offensive language often goes in one ear and out the other.

It may not be offensive to me. But NPR has 901 member stations and millions of listeners.

As of the latest national ratings period, fall 2009, NPR stations reach 33.9 million Americans every week, according to NPR data. NPR programming and newscasts reach 27.1 million.

There is no doubt that a healthy number of those listeners take the Lord's name seriously and are offended when it is taken in vain.

And it’s not just in the South.

WSHU in Fairfield, CT, got a very irate call because the station didn’t catch the warning that NPR sent out with the story. Even if someone at the station had seen the language warning, it’s difficult to bleep out live. It would have been far easier if NPR had covered over the word.

Since the bulk of NPR's staff is in Washington, DC, I’m guessing that many staffers wouldn't even hear the Cruise clip as profane. But they should think about how others might hear it – including David Shuford and the others who called or wrote to complain.

It’s a simple thing to bleep it out.

CBS and NBC both have a policy that forbids using the word on their air. NPR should adopt such a policy and ensure that its staff all knows about it and adheres to it.

This is an easy fix.

UPDATE: Before publishing, I made the case that I've written about to Ellen Weiss, senior vice president for news, that NPR should institute a policy banning the word in question. But I wasn't successful.

While Weiss says she understands that some stations would like to see the word banned, she said, "I don’t see a compelling reason to change our practice.”


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: npr; swearing
"I don’t see a compelling reason to change our practice.”

I don't see a compelling reason I'm forced to pay for NPR

1 posted on 07/02/2010 1:24:03 PM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drango
Taking the Lord’s name in vain does not go over well in some households,

It didn't go over very well in our household either. A good way to get your mouth washed out with soap.

It will cost you 3 Hail Marys and two Our Fathers with our parish priest.

2 posted on 07/02/2010 1:27:58 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

The POTUS uses cursewords when he addresses the nation.


3 posted on 07/02/2010 1:31:36 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

It doesn’t go over well with me either.


4 posted on 07/02/2010 1:32:30 PM PDT by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mware

I cannot stand to hear God’s name taken in vain. There is no reason for it. Why can’t they use allah’s name instead?


5 posted on 07/02/2010 1:32:37 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drango

It’s a commandment, not a suggestion.


6 posted on 07/02/2010 1:36:06 PM PDT by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

I can’t wait for the next time NPR describes Mohammed as an itinerant goat-screwing pedophile.

I just don’t see that happening. I also don’t forsee any in depth stories about the Dancing Boys of the Warlords of Afghanistan. Turns our the people we are defending over there like to take 9 to 12 year old boys, dress them as girls, and then make the beast with two backs with them.


7 posted on 07/02/2010 1:40:07 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator
Taking the Lord’s name in vain does not go over well in some households, particularly in the South.

But it's perfectly okay to take the Lord's name in vain here on FR. Right Admin? I've reported several replies that took the Lord's name in vain. Nothing was done about it. What a shame.

8 posted on 07/02/2010 1:40:22 PM PDT by upchuck (Don't let freedom slip away. After America, there is no place to go ~ Kitty Werthmann - Google her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango; wagglebee

Tom Cruise is a $cientologist. Mocking your God is no concern of his.


9 posted on 07/02/2010 1:48:22 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
But NPR’s legal team says that using the Lord’s name in vain for emphasis is not illegal.

What does NPR's legal team say about any possible pro-God use of religious expressions? Would that violate their legal standing since they are government funded?

10 posted on 07/02/2010 1:50:19 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Clearly it didn’t bother the people in Murtha’s district. They reelected him after he referred to his opponent as a GD carpet-bagger. Old bastard. Wonder what he’s doing now? Burning, perhaps?


11 posted on 07/02/2010 1:50:27 PM PDT by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
"NPR describes Mohammed as an itinerant goat-screwing pedophile."

LOL...~snort...post your feedback in the NPR comment section.

12 posted on 07/02/2010 1:51:36 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
"But it's perfectly okay to take the Lord's name in vain here on FR. Right Admin? I've reported several replies that took the Lord's name in vain. Nothing was done about it. What a shame. "

I know the admins have a lot to review but...If that is the case, I'd respectfully suggest a change in the policy from now on.

13 posted on 07/02/2010 1:53:07 PM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Actually, our God's name isn't God..it's Yahweh or YHWH or Yeshuah.

I fully agree that G-D is highly offensive, but I don't think that's ALL He meant by that particular commandment [the word vain in Exodus 20:7 is שוא (shav') in Hebrew, meaning emptiness, nothingness, frivolousness, even deceit or lying].

It's been a long time since I have pored over what theological scholars and rabbis say about this but I think it's time for me to do some digging again.

BTW I also think it's important to look at the context to understand exactly what G-d meant by that commandment (i.e. what the Jews were doing at the time of Moses to "take the name of Yahweh/YHWH/Adonai/Hashem/Elohim" in vain).

Of course, there are some believers who believe that the Name of G-d is so holy it shouldn't be spoken at all.

14 posted on 07/02/2010 1:55:25 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drango

And if Tom Cruise said “allah be damned” I’m sure no one would make a big deal out of it.


15 posted on 07/02/2010 1:56:28 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( - Eccl. 10:18 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
The POTUS uses cursewords when he addresses the nation.

His pastor says it's A-OK, "God BLESS America? NO! G**D*** AmeriKKKa!"

16 posted on 07/02/2010 1:57:03 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drango

But just let somebody on NPR say the n-word, particularly about their lord, Obama, ....


17 posted on 07/02/2010 3:16:27 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Whoever said they were consistent?


18 posted on 07/02/2010 4:22:06 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Drango
NPR has way more issues than using the Lords name in vain.

Open your ears and you will hear their promotion of the homosexual lifestyle and the total denigration of religion and of the things that made America great.

I listen for the same reason I read Cosmo magazine. It's how I study the enemy's battle plan.

19 posted on 07/02/2010 4:47:36 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It’s a simple thing to bleep it out.

We're talking about NPR where the editors and staffers are to the left of Stalin.

20 posted on 07/02/2010 10:27:21 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson