To: Red Badger
Her answer in response to a commerce clause question indicated that there is NOTHING that it doesn’t cover,
and nothing that the gov’t should be restricted from doing or requiring.
22 posted on
06/30/2010 1:27:49 PM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
Damn FDR........................
36 posted on
06/30/2010 1:34:07 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
To: MrB
Her answer in response to a commerce clause question indicated that there is NOTHING that it doesn’t cover, and nothing that the gov’t should be restricted from doing or requiring.Unfortunately, that's the same view Justice Scalia took in the medical marijuana case.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson